在一个模拟模型中,自行车头盔中的软泡沫降低了冲击力

Davis J. Wong
{"title":"在一个模拟模型中,自行车头盔中的软泡沫降低了冲击力","authors":"Davis J. Wong","doi":"10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study compared the linear acceleration generated from an impact to a manikin's head wearing an off-the -shelf “standard” bicycle helmet (stdBH) compared to a modified bicycle helmet (modBH) (original foam replaced with softer polyolefin foam). Methods: Pairs of 5 different bicycle helmets from a wide price range ($20-$90) were tested (standard versus modified). The head impact was simulated by striking the test bicycle helmet placed onto the head of a Century BOB boxing manikin, with a conventional football helmet (4.6 kg additional weight added) swung from a 1.2 meter rope and released from an angle of 45º serially for multiple data points as in Figure 2. The manikin's bicycle helmet was struck by the football helmet in the frontal, left parietal, and occipital locations for 12 trials each. Each of three accelerometers located at the manikin’s forehead, apex of the head, and right ear collected data on linear acceleration in the X, Y, and Z planes. Results: Mean linear acceleration in G's (9.8 m/sec/sec) was obtained from the three accelerometer locations on the manikin's head for each striking position. The mean linear accelerations across the 5 different helmet pairs are summarized in the graphs (Figure 3). For each of the three striking locations, there were statistically lower striking forces sustained with the modified softer foam bicycle helmet (modBH) compared to the standard bicycle helmet (stdBH). The greatest reductions were observed in the apical accelerometers when the manikin was struck from the occipital and parietal locations. Conclusion: These results suggest that softer foams in bicycle helmets may reduce injury from bicycle accidents. Further research on this topic can lead to the development of safer and more effective bicycle helmets.","PeriodicalId":382758,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Paediatrics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Softer Foam in Bicycle Helmets Reduces the Impact Force in a Simulation Model\",\"authors\":\"Davis J. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study compared the linear acceleration generated from an impact to a manikin's head wearing an off-the -shelf “standard” bicycle helmet (stdBH) compared to a modified bicycle helmet (modBH) (original foam replaced with softer polyolefin foam). Methods: Pairs of 5 different bicycle helmets from a wide price range ($20-$90) were tested (standard versus modified). The head impact was simulated by striking the test bicycle helmet placed onto the head of a Century BOB boxing manikin, with a conventional football helmet (4.6 kg additional weight added) swung from a 1.2 meter rope and released from an angle of 45º serially for multiple data points as in Figure 2. The manikin's bicycle helmet was struck by the football helmet in the frontal, left parietal, and occipital locations for 12 trials each. Each of three accelerometers located at the manikin’s forehead, apex of the head, and right ear collected data on linear acceleration in the X, Y, and Z planes. Results: Mean linear acceleration in G's (9.8 m/sec/sec) was obtained from the three accelerometer locations on the manikin's head for each striking position. The mean linear accelerations across the 5 different helmet pairs are summarized in the graphs (Figure 3). For each of the three striking locations, there were statistically lower striking forces sustained with the modified softer foam bicycle helmet (modBH) compared to the standard bicycle helmet (stdBH). The greatest reductions were observed in the apical accelerometers when the manikin was struck from the occipital and parietal locations. Conclusion: These results suggest that softer foams in bicycle helmets may reduce injury from bicycle accidents. Further research on this topic can lead to the development of safer and more effective bicycle helmets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SVOA Paediatrics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SVOA Paediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了一个戴着现成的“标准”自行车头盔(stdBH)和一个改进的自行车头盔(modBH)(用更柔软的聚烯烃泡沫代替原始泡沫)的人体模型头部受到冲击时产生的线性加速度。方法:对5对不同的自行车头盔进行测试,这些头盔的价格范围很宽(20- 90美元)(标准头盔和改进头盔)。头部撞击是通过撞击放置在Century BOB拳击人体模型头上的测试自行车头盔来模拟的,而传统的足球头盔(增加了4.6公斤的额外重量)则从1.2米长的绳子上摆动,并以45º的角度连续释放,如图2所示。人体模型的自行车头盔被橄榄球头盔击中了前额、左顶骨和枕部,各进行了12次试验。三个加速度计分别位于人体的前额、头部顶端和右耳,每个加速度计收集X、Y和Z平面上的线性加速度数据。结果:从人体头部的三个加速度计位置获得了每个撞击位置的平均线加速度,单位为G (9.8 m/sec/sec)。图3总结了5对不同头盔的平均线性加速度。对于三个撞击位置,与标准自行车头盔(stdBH)相比,改良软泡沫自行车头盔(modBH)承受的撞击力在统计上更低。当人体从枕部和顶骨部位受到撞击时,观察到最大的顶点加速度计下降。结论:软泡沫自行车头盔可以减少自行车事故的伤害。对这一课题的进一步研究可以开发出更安全、更有效的自行车头盔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Softer Foam in Bicycle Helmets Reduces the Impact Force in a Simulation Model
Objective: This study compared the linear acceleration generated from an impact to a manikin's head wearing an off-the -shelf “standard” bicycle helmet (stdBH) compared to a modified bicycle helmet (modBH) (original foam replaced with softer polyolefin foam). Methods: Pairs of 5 different bicycle helmets from a wide price range ($20-$90) were tested (standard versus modified). The head impact was simulated by striking the test bicycle helmet placed onto the head of a Century BOB boxing manikin, with a conventional football helmet (4.6 kg additional weight added) swung from a 1.2 meter rope and released from an angle of 45º serially for multiple data points as in Figure 2. The manikin's bicycle helmet was struck by the football helmet in the frontal, left parietal, and occipital locations for 12 trials each. Each of three accelerometers located at the manikin’s forehead, apex of the head, and right ear collected data on linear acceleration in the X, Y, and Z planes. Results: Mean linear acceleration in G's (9.8 m/sec/sec) was obtained from the three accelerometer locations on the manikin's head for each striking position. The mean linear accelerations across the 5 different helmet pairs are summarized in the graphs (Figure 3). For each of the three striking locations, there were statistically lower striking forces sustained with the modified softer foam bicycle helmet (modBH) compared to the standard bicycle helmet (stdBH). The greatest reductions were observed in the apical accelerometers when the manikin was struck from the occipital and parietal locations. Conclusion: These results suggest that softer foams in bicycle helmets may reduce injury from bicycle accidents. Further research on this topic can lead to the development of safer and more effective bicycle helmets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信