技术审计的错觉:调查的结果和提出的解决方案

P. Kanof
{"title":"技术审计的错觉:调查的结果和提出的解决方案","authors":"P. Kanof","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper revisits the author's prediction of 10 years ago of the risk of conflict of interest between information technology auditors and large CPA firms and discusses some cases which lend support to this prediction. The survey shows the lack of consulting boundaries/rules has had terrible consequences to the economy and to the small investors. In order to address this problem of conflict of interest, three actions are proposed.","PeriodicalId":355841,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The illusion of technology auditing: the results of a survey and proposed solutions\",\"authors\":\"P. Kanof\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper revisits the author's prediction of 10 years ago of the risk of conflict of interest between information technology auditors and large CPA firms and discusses some cases which lend support to this prediction. The survey shows the lack of consulting boundaries/rules has had terrible consequences to the economy and to the small investors. In order to address this problem of conflict of interest, three actions are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了作者十年前对信息技术审计师与大型注册会计师事务所之间利益冲突风险的预测,并讨论了一些支持这一预测的案例。调查显示,缺乏咨询界限/规则对经济和小投资者造成了可怕的后果。为了解决这一利益冲突问题,建议采取三种行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The illusion of technology auditing: the results of a survey and proposed solutions
This paper revisits the author's prediction of 10 years ago of the risk of conflict of interest between information technology auditors and large CPA firms and discusses some cases which lend support to this prediction. The survey shows the lack of consulting boundaries/rules has had terrible consequences to the economy and to the small investors. In order to address this problem of conflict of interest, three actions are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信