{"title":"技术审计的错觉:调查的结果和提出的解决方案","authors":"P. Kanof","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper revisits the author's prediction of 10 years ago of the risk of conflict of interest between information technology auditors and large CPA firms and discusses some cases which lend support to this prediction. The survey shows the lack of consulting boundaries/rules has had terrible consequences to the economy and to the small investors. In order to address this problem of conflict of interest, three actions are proposed.","PeriodicalId":355841,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The illusion of technology auditing: the results of a survey and proposed solutions\",\"authors\":\"P. Kanof\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper revisits the author's prediction of 10 years ago of the risk of conflict of interest between information technology auditors and large CPA firms and discusses some cases which lend support to this prediction. The survey shows the lack of consulting boundaries/rules has had terrible consequences to the economy and to the small investors. In order to address this problem of conflict of interest, three actions are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The illusion of technology auditing: the results of a survey and proposed solutions
This paper revisits the author's prediction of 10 years ago of the risk of conflict of interest between information technology auditors and large CPA firms and discusses some cases which lend support to this prediction. The survey shows the lack of consulting boundaries/rules has had terrible consequences to the economy and to the small investors. In order to address this problem of conflict of interest, three actions are proposed.