{"title":"游戏的(天意的)目的","authors":"Peter Lake","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv12sdz9d.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter highlights how William Shakespeare's plays advert directly to its own generic mixedness and hybridity. It mentions Polonius' famous commendation of the players and Hamlet's disquisition on the purpose of playing. It also analyzes the extended speech that described Pyrrhus' revenge upon Priam as a language of speech that reproduces and parodies a certain sort of Senecan tragedy. The chapter describes how Hamlet starts out by aligning itself with Senecan models and prototypes. It discusses Shakespeare 's new version of Hamlet that was designed almost simultaneously to elicit, frustrate, and transcend a range of audience expectations. It also outlines Hamlet's instructions to the actors on how he wants his play acted that are framed against a satiric account that doubles as a denunciation of a style of acting with which the audience would have been familiar.","PeriodicalId":184704,"journal":{"name":"Hamlet's Choice","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The (providential) purposes of playing\",\"authors\":\"Peter Lake\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv12sdz9d.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter highlights how William Shakespeare's plays advert directly to its own generic mixedness and hybridity. It mentions Polonius' famous commendation of the players and Hamlet's disquisition on the purpose of playing. It also analyzes the extended speech that described Pyrrhus' revenge upon Priam as a language of speech that reproduces and parodies a certain sort of Senecan tragedy. The chapter describes how Hamlet starts out by aligning itself with Senecan models and prototypes. It discusses Shakespeare 's new version of Hamlet that was designed almost simultaneously to elicit, frustrate, and transcend a range of audience expectations. It also outlines Hamlet's instructions to the actors on how he wants his play acted that are framed against a satiric account that doubles as a denunciation of a style of acting with which the audience would have been familiar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hamlet's Choice\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hamlet's Choice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdz9d.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hamlet's Choice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdz9d.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter highlights how William Shakespeare's plays advert directly to its own generic mixedness and hybridity. It mentions Polonius' famous commendation of the players and Hamlet's disquisition on the purpose of playing. It also analyzes the extended speech that described Pyrrhus' revenge upon Priam as a language of speech that reproduces and parodies a certain sort of Senecan tragedy. The chapter describes how Hamlet starts out by aligning itself with Senecan models and prototypes. It discusses Shakespeare 's new version of Hamlet that was designed almost simultaneously to elicit, frustrate, and transcend a range of audience expectations. It also outlines Hamlet's instructions to the actors on how he wants his play acted that are framed against a satiric account that doubles as a denunciation of a style of acting with which the audience would have been familiar.