变化中的机构股票偏好:直接和间接证据

M. Blume, Donald B. Keim
{"title":"变化中的机构股票偏好:直接和间接证据","authors":"M. Blume, Donald B. Keim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1788186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutional investors have rapidly increased their percentage holdings of US equities in recent years. In this paper we update previous research on the nature of institutional stock ownership, extending the evidence by eleven years to the end of 2008. In contrast to previous research, we find that institutions, and particularly hedge funds, have increased their holdings of smaller stocks and decreased their holdings of larger stocks over this period. Institutions as a whole now underweight the largest stocks and overweight the smallest stocks relative to market weights. We then compare the direct evidence of changing institutional preferences to the indirect evidence from a four-factor model.","PeriodicalId":351720,"journal":{"name":"Wharton School: Finance (Topic)","volume":"32 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing Institutional Preferences for Stocks: Direct and Indirect Evidence\",\"authors\":\"M. Blume, Donald B. Keim\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1788186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Institutional investors have rapidly increased their percentage holdings of US equities in recent years. In this paper we update previous research on the nature of institutional stock ownership, extending the evidence by eleven years to the end of 2008. In contrast to previous research, we find that institutions, and particularly hedge funds, have increased their holdings of smaller stocks and decreased their holdings of larger stocks over this period. Institutions as a whole now underweight the largest stocks and overweight the smallest stocks relative to market weights. We then compare the direct evidence of changing institutional preferences to the indirect evidence from a four-factor model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wharton School: Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"32 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wharton School: Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1788186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wharton School: Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1788186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

近年来,机构投资者迅速提高了其在美国股票中的持股比例。在本文中,我们更新了以往关于机构持股性质的研究,将证据延长了11年,至2008年底。与之前的研究相反,我们发现机构,尤其是对冲基金,在此期间增加了对小型股票的持有,减少了对大型股票的持有。相对于市场权重,机构整体上现在减持规模最大的股票,增持规模最小的股票。然后,我们比较了制度偏好变化的直接证据和四因素模型的间接证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing Institutional Preferences for Stocks: Direct and Indirect Evidence
Institutional investors have rapidly increased their percentage holdings of US equities in recent years. In this paper we update previous research on the nature of institutional stock ownership, extending the evidence by eleven years to the end of 2008. In contrast to previous research, we find that institutions, and particularly hedge funds, have increased their holdings of smaller stocks and decreased their holdings of larger stocks over this period. Institutions as a whole now underweight the largest stocks and overweight the smallest stocks relative to market weights. We then compare the direct evidence of changing institutional preferences to the indirect evidence from a four-factor model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信