历史犯罪的司法救济:程序

G. Hazard,
{"title":"历史犯罪的司法救济:程序","authors":"G. Hazard,","doi":"10.1163/157180403100411833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In logical and formal legal terms, the concept of compensation for victims of historical crimes through civil legal proceedings is perfectly coherent and can be implemented in many legal systems with limited technical difficulties. Claims for compensation can be formulated in pleadings on the basis of substantive legal theorems recognized in virtually all modern legal systems. Problems of evidence can be accommodated by relaxation of the restrictions on “hearsay” evidence. Various procedural mechanisms exist in all modern legal systems by which claims of multiple claimants can be joined together in one action or by consolidation of separate proceedings. Adjustments in other procedural rules that formally are only minor ones would accommodate the claims. Hence, arguments questioning the legitimacy of claims for compensation for historical crimes cannot be intelligently addressed in terms of conventional legal analysis of judicial procedures. Instead, different terms of reference are required.","PeriodicalId":148959,"journal":{"name":"International Law Forum Du Droit International","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Redress for Historical Crimes: Procedure\",\"authors\":\"G. Hazard,\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/157180403100411833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction In logical and formal legal terms, the concept of compensation for victims of historical crimes through civil legal proceedings is perfectly coherent and can be implemented in many legal systems with limited technical difficulties. Claims for compensation can be formulated in pleadings on the basis of substantive legal theorems recognized in virtually all modern legal systems. Problems of evidence can be accommodated by relaxation of the restrictions on “hearsay” evidence. Various procedural mechanisms exist in all modern legal systems by which claims of multiple claimants can be joined together in one action or by consolidation of separate proceedings. Adjustments in other procedural rules that formally are only minor ones would accommodate the claims. Hence, arguments questioning the legitimacy of claims for compensation for historical crimes cannot be intelligently addressed in terms of conventional legal analysis of judicial procedures. Instead, different terms of reference are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Law Forum Du Droit International\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Law Forum Du Droit International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/157180403100411833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Law Forum Du Droit International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/157180403100411833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在逻辑和正式的法律术语中,通过民事法律程序赔偿历史罪行受害者的概念是完全连贯的,可以在许多法律制度中实施,但技术困难有限。根据几乎所有现代法律制度所承认的实体法定理,可以在诉状中提出赔偿要求。证据问题可以通过放宽对“传闻”证据的限制来解决。在所有现代法律制度中都存在各种程序机制,通过这些机制,多个索赔人的索赔可以在一个诉讼中结合在一起,或通过合并单独的诉讼。对其他程序规则进行的形式上只是轻微的调整将适应索赔要求。因此,质疑历史罪行赔偿要求的合法性的论点,无法根据对司法程序的传统法律分析来明智地解决。相反,需要不同的职权范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judicial Redress for Historical Crimes: Procedure
Introduction In logical and formal legal terms, the concept of compensation for victims of historical crimes through civil legal proceedings is perfectly coherent and can be implemented in many legal systems with limited technical difficulties. Claims for compensation can be formulated in pleadings on the basis of substantive legal theorems recognized in virtually all modern legal systems. Problems of evidence can be accommodated by relaxation of the restrictions on “hearsay” evidence. Various procedural mechanisms exist in all modern legal systems by which claims of multiple claimants can be joined together in one action or by consolidation of separate proceedings. Adjustments in other procedural rules that formally are only minor ones would accommodate the claims. Hence, arguments questioning the legitimacy of claims for compensation for historical crimes cannot be intelligently addressed in terms of conventional legal analysis of judicial procedures. Instead, different terms of reference are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信