进入

{"title":"进入","authors":"","doi":"10.5040/9781350223752.ch-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The res judicata is the institute that provides security to all legal relationships brought to the consideration of the Judicial Power. The res judicata provides immunization for the decision handed down by the Judiciary. The mandatory, as a fundamental characteristic of the jurisdiction provided by the state, only has full validity if what was already decided cannot be changed by subsequent decision. However, the protection afforded by the res judicata cannot be bigger than what was actually decided ( res judicanda ), whose boundaries are contained within the dispute itself. Thus, only the part that changes the reality of the subjects of the process is important for the stabilization of res judicata , which is the dispositive. But, the reasons that led the Judiciary to come to their conclusions are not reached by the authority of res judicata . The fundaments have close relation to the causa petendi of the author and the causa excipiendi of the defendant. If it was allowed that new arguments, that have the power to change the causa petendi , could be deducted in new demand, since not deducted in the first demand, the legal system would be reduced to a huge legal unsafety. This study aims to present what material of the first process is irrelevant for further discussion, even if not alleged. Therefore, for a correct understanding of the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata , it is necessary to examine (i) others related legal institutions, which are res judicata and preclusion; (ii) objective limits of res judicata; (iii) the position of the problem posed by the wording of the text of the art. 508 of the Civil Procedure Code, and, with it, the doctrinal and jurisprudential divergence exists on what would be the real scope of the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata ; (iv) which solution should be given in order to correctly apply the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata ; (v) what area of expertise and what issues are subject to the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata; (vi) the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata judged as a way to prevent other demands incompatible with the final decision being proposed and, finally, (vii) the treatment given to the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata by the new Code of Civil Procedure ( law n. 13.105/2015).","PeriodicalId":201457,"journal":{"name":"United Queerdom","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coming Into\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781350223752.ch-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The res judicata is the institute that provides security to all legal relationships brought to the consideration of the Judicial Power. The res judicata provides immunization for the decision handed down by the Judiciary. The mandatory, as a fundamental characteristic of the jurisdiction provided by the state, only has full validity if what was already decided cannot be changed by subsequent decision. However, the protection afforded by the res judicata cannot be bigger than what was actually decided ( res judicanda ), whose boundaries are contained within the dispute itself. Thus, only the part that changes the reality of the subjects of the process is important for the stabilization of res judicata , which is the dispositive. But, the reasons that led the Judiciary to come to their conclusions are not reached by the authority of res judicata . The fundaments have close relation to the causa petendi of the author and the causa excipiendi of the defendant. If it was allowed that new arguments, that have the power to change the causa petendi , could be deducted in new demand, since not deducted in the first demand, the legal system would be reduced to a huge legal unsafety. This study aims to present what material of the first process is irrelevant for further discussion, even if not alleged. Therefore, for a correct understanding of the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata , it is necessary to examine (i) others related legal institutions, which are res judicata and preclusion; (ii) objective limits of res judicata; (iii) the position of the problem posed by the wording of the text of the art. 508 of the Civil Procedure Code, and, with it, the doctrinal and jurisprudential divergence exists on what would be the real scope of the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata ; (iv) which solution should be given in order to correctly apply the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata ; (v) what area of expertise and what issues are subject to the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata; (vi) the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata judged as a way to prevent other demands incompatible with the final decision being proposed and, finally, (vii) the treatment given to the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata by the new Code of Civil Procedure ( law n. 13.105/2015).\",\"PeriodicalId\":201457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United Queerdom\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United Queerdom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350223752.ch-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United Queerdom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350223752.ch-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coming Into
The res judicata is the institute that provides security to all legal relationships brought to the consideration of the Judicial Power. The res judicata provides immunization for the decision handed down by the Judiciary. The mandatory, as a fundamental characteristic of the jurisdiction provided by the state, only has full validity if what was already decided cannot be changed by subsequent decision. However, the protection afforded by the res judicata cannot be bigger than what was actually decided ( res judicanda ), whose boundaries are contained within the dispute itself. Thus, only the part that changes the reality of the subjects of the process is important for the stabilization of res judicata , which is the dispositive. But, the reasons that led the Judiciary to come to their conclusions are not reached by the authority of res judicata . The fundaments have close relation to the causa petendi of the author and the causa excipiendi of the defendant. If it was allowed that new arguments, that have the power to change the causa petendi , could be deducted in new demand, since not deducted in the first demand, the legal system would be reduced to a huge legal unsafety. This study aims to present what material of the first process is irrelevant for further discussion, even if not alleged. Therefore, for a correct understanding of the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata , it is necessary to examine (i) others related legal institutions, which are res judicata and preclusion; (ii) objective limits of res judicata; (iii) the position of the problem posed by the wording of the text of the art. 508 of the Civil Procedure Code, and, with it, the doctrinal and jurisprudential divergence exists on what would be the real scope of the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata ; (iv) which solution should be given in order to correctly apply the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata ; (v) what area of expertise and what issues are subject to the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata; (vi) the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata judged as a way to prevent other demands incompatible with the final decision being proposed and, finally, (vii) the treatment given to the Preclusive coming into force of res judicata by the new Code of Civil Procedure ( law n. 13.105/2015).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信