解决能源部门责任制度的空白

Vlad Ivanenko
{"title":"解决能源部门责任制度的空白","authors":"Vlad Ivanenko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1977695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two recent events in the energy sector – the Macondo well blowout in the U.S. coastal waters and a series of equipment failures at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant in Japan – have shown that current definitions of who pays for accidental pollution damage and third parties’ losses are ambiguous. Using methods of economic analysis, this paper identifies potential deficiencies in the current liability regimes for the energy sector and proposes certain measures, introduction of which would increase efficiency of some liability regimes.","PeriodicalId":277238,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Energy (Sustainability) eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing Gaps in a Liability Regime for the Energy Sector\",\"authors\":\"Vlad Ivanenko\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1977695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two recent events in the energy sector – the Macondo well blowout in the U.S. coastal waters and a series of equipment failures at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant in Japan – have shown that current definitions of who pays for accidental pollution damage and third parties’ losses are ambiguous. Using methods of economic analysis, this paper identifies potential deficiencies in the current liability regimes for the energy sector and proposes certain measures, introduction of which would increase efficiency of some liability regimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Energy (Sustainability) eJournal\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Energy (Sustainability) eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1977695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Energy (Sustainability) eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1977695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近发生在能源领域的两起事件——美国沿海水域的Macondo油井井喷和日本福岛第一核电站的一系列设备故障——表明,目前关于谁为意外污染损害和第三方损失买单的定义是模糊的。本文利用经济分析方法,确定了当前能源部门责任制度的潜在缺陷,并提出了一些措施,这些措施的引入将提高一些责任制度的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing Gaps in a Liability Regime for the Energy Sector
Two recent events in the energy sector – the Macondo well blowout in the U.S. coastal waters and a series of equipment failures at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant in Japan – have shown that current definitions of who pays for accidental pollution damage and third parties’ losses are ambiguous. Using methods of economic analysis, this paper identifies potential deficiencies in the current liability regimes for the energy sector and proposes certain measures, introduction of which would increase efficiency of some liability regimes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信