图像自动标注优化器的比较研究

Eliyah Immanuel Thavaraj A, S. Juliet, Anila Sharon J
{"title":"图像自动标注优化器的比较研究","authors":"Eliyah Immanuel Thavaraj A, S. Juliet, Anila Sharon J","doi":"10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of artificial intelligence, computer vision and natural language processing are used to automatically generate an image's contents. The regenerative neuronal model is developed and is dependent on machine translation and computer vision. Using this technique, natural phrases are produced that finally explain the image. This architecture also includes recurrent neural networks (RNN) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The RNN is used to create phrases, whereas the CNN is used to extract characteristics from images. The model has been taught to produce captions that, when given an input image, almost exactly describe the image. The outcome of these algorithms is determined by several factors, including feature extraction, caption generation, and optimizer selection. Our goal is to conduct a comparative analysis of several optimizers to determine the optimizer that achieves highest accuracy for a deep learning model. The deep learning model is subsequently trained with various optimizers on the Flicker dataset. The accuracy of the results of the model using optimizers are achieved as follows: RMSprop optimizer has a 92% accuracy, SGD has a 12% accuracy, Adam optimizer has 53% accuracy, and Adadelta has a 12% per cent.","PeriodicalId":356949,"journal":{"name":"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Optimizers for Automatic Image Captioning\",\"authors\":\"Eliyah Immanuel Thavaraj A, S. Juliet, Anila Sharon J\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the field of artificial intelligence, computer vision and natural language processing are used to automatically generate an image's contents. The regenerative neuronal model is developed and is dependent on machine translation and computer vision. Using this technique, natural phrases are produced that finally explain the image. This architecture also includes recurrent neural networks (RNN) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The RNN is used to create phrases, whereas the CNN is used to extract characteristics from images. The model has been taught to produce captions that, when given an input image, almost exactly describe the image. The outcome of these algorithms is determined by several factors, including feature extraction, caption generation, and optimizer selection. Our goal is to conduct a comparative analysis of several optimizers to determine the optimizer that achieves highest accuracy for a deep learning model. The deep learning model is subsequently trained with various optimizers on the Flicker dataset. The accuracy of the results of the model using optimizers are achieved as follows: RMSprop optimizer has a 92% accuracy, SGD has a 12% accuracy, Adam optimizer has 53% accuracy, and Adadelta has a 12% per cent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在人工智能领域,计算机视觉和自然语言处理被用来自动生成图像的内容。建立了基于机器翻译和计算机视觉的再生神经元模型。使用这种技术,自然的短语产生,最终解释图像。该架构还包括循环神经网络(RNN)和卷积神经网络(CNN)。RNN用于创建短语,而CNN用于从图像中提取特征。该模型已经学会了当输入图像时,生成几乎准确描述图像的标题。这些算法的结果由几个因素决定,包括特征提取、标题生成和优化器选择。我们的目标是对几个优化器进行比较分析,以确定为深度学习模型实现最高精度的优化器。深度学习模型随后在Flicker数据集上使用各种优化器进行训练。使用优化器的模型结果的精度达到如下:RMSprop优化器的精度为92%,SGD的精度为12%,Adam优化器的精度为53%,Adadelta的精度为12%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study on Optimizers for Automatic Image Captioning
In the field of artificial intelligence, computer vision and natural language processing are used to automatically generate an image's contents. The regenerative neuronal model is developed and is dependent on machine translation and computer vision. Using this technique, natural phrases are produced that finally explain the image. This architecture also includes recurrent neural networks (RNN) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The RNN is used to create phrases, whereas the CNN is used to extract characteristics from images. The model has been taught to produce captions that, when given an input image, almost exactly describe the image. The outcome of these algorithms is determined by several factors, including feature extraction, caption generation, and optimizer selection. Our goal is to conduct a comparative analysis of several optimizers to determine the optimizer that achieves highest accuracy for a deep learning model. The deep learning model is subsequently trained with various optimizers on the Flicker dataset. The accuracy of the results of the model using optimizers are achieved as follows: RMSprop optimizer has a 92% accuracy, SGD has a 12% accuracy, Adam optimizer has 53% accuracy, and Adadelta has a 12% per cent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信