子宫内膜异位症的现代无创诊断

В. Кудрявцева, В. Геец, Я. А. Мангилева, А. В. Чижова, О. В. Пацюк, Россия Екатеринбург, Городская Клиническая Больница
{"title":"子宫内膜异位症的现代无创诊断","authors":"В. Кудрявцева, В. Геец, Я. А. Мангилева, А. В. Чижова, О. В. Пацюк, Россия Екатеринбург, Городская Клиническая Больница","doi":"10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-4-140-147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Endometriosis is a disease characterized by an overgrowth of morphologically and functionally endometrium-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. Early diagnosis of endometriosis is very difficult. The gold standard for diagnosis is the surgical method − laparoscopy, performed for infertility, pelvic pain or the presence of pelvic masses. However, this approach is currently being reconsidered, and the search for endometriosis markers for earlier diagnosis of this disease is relevant.The purpose of the literature review was to summarize the current data on promising noninvasive markers of endometriosis determined in various biological media.Materials and methods. Scientific literature was searched in PubMed, ResearchGate, and Elibrary databases for 2017−2022 using a combination of Russian and English keywords: endometriosis, endometrioma, endometriosis pathogenesis, peritoneal fluid, biomarkers, serum markers.Results. We evaluated more than 30 putative biomarkers in peritoneal fluid, serum, urine, and saliva, as well as their combinations in publications that met the selection criteria. Studies have evaluated the diagnostic value and efficacy of endometriosis biomarkers, but the results of these studies have sometimes been inconsistent. We were unable to identify a single biomarker or combination of biomarkers that was unequivocally clinically useful. The most significant changes in biochemical composition were observed in peritoneal fluid, but it requires invasive intervention to obtain it.Discussion. Saliva and urine studies have shown promising results in terms of diagnostic accuracy, but the evidence was of low quality for introduction into clinical guidelines. A number of serum biomarkers may be useful either for detecting endometriosis at early stages or for differentiating ovarian endometrioma from other benign ovarian masses, but the evidence for meaningful conclusions is insufficient. Conclusion None of the biomarkers have shown sufficient accuracy for clinical use outside of the research environment, yet research in this area remains promising.","PeriodicalId":247511,"journal":{"name":"Ural Medical Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis\",\"authors\":\"В. Кудрявцева, В. Геец, Я. А. Мангилева, А. В. Чижова, О. В. Пацюк, Россия Екатеринбург, Городская Клиническая Больница\",\"doi\":\"10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-4-140-147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Endometriosis is a disease characterized by an overgrowth of morphologically and functionally endometrium-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. Early diagnosis of endometriosis is very difficult. The gold standard for diagnosis is the surgical method − laparoscopy, performed for infertility, pelvic pain or the presence of pelvic masses. However, this approach is currently being reconsidered, and the search for endometriosis markers for earlier diagnosis of this disease is relevant.The purpose of the literature review was to summarize the current data on promising noninvasive markers of endometriosis determined in various biological media.Materials and methods. Scientific literature was searched in PubMed, ResearchGate, and Elibrary databases for 2017−2022 using a combination of Russian and English keywords: endometriosis, endometrioma, endometriosis pathogenesis, peritoneal fluid, biomarkers, serum markers.Results. We evaluated more than 30 putative biomarkers in peritoneal fluid, serum, urine, and saliva, as well as their combinations in publications that met the selection criteria. Studies have evaluated the diagnostic value and efficacy of endometriosis biomarkers, but the results of these studies have sometimes been inconsistent. We were unable to identify a single biomarker or combination of biomarkers that was unequivocally clinically useful. The most significant changes in biochemical composition were observed in peritoneal fluid, but it requires invasive intervention to obtain it.Discussion. Saliva and urine studies have shown promising results in terms of diagnostic accuracy, but the evidence was of low quality for introduction into clinical guidelines. A number of serum biomarkers may be useful either for detecting endometriosis at early stages or for differentiating ovarian endometrioma from other benign ovarian masses, but the evidence for meaningful conclusions is insufficient. Conclusion None of the biomarkers have shown sufficient accuracy for clinical use outside of the research environment, yet research in this area remains promising.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ural Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ural Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-4-140-147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ural Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-4-140-147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。子宫内膜异位症是一种以子宫腔外形态和功能上的子宫内膜样组织过度生长为特征的疾病。早期诊断子宫内膜异位症是非常困难的。诊断的金标准是手术方法-腹腔镜检查,用于不孕症,盆腔疼痛或盆腔肿块的存在。然而,这种方法目前正在被重新考虑,寻找子宫内膜异位症标志物对这种疾病的早期诊断是相关的。文献综述的目的是总结目前在各种生物介质中确定的有前途的子宫内膜异位症无创标志物的数据。材料和方法。在PubMed、ResearchGate和图书馆数据库中检索2017 - 2022年的科学文献,检索关键词为:子宫内膜异位症、子宫内膜异位症、子宫内膜异位症发病机制、腹膜液、生物标志物、血清标志物。我们评估了腹膜液、血清、尿液和唾液中超过30种假定的生物标志物,以及它们在符合选择标准的出版物中的组合。研究评估了子宫内膜异位症生物标志物的诊断价值和疗效,但这些研究的结果有时不一致。我们无法确定一个单一的生物标志物或生物标志物的组合是明确的临床有用的。在腹膜液中观察到最显著的生化组成变化,但需要侵入性干预才能获得。唾液和尿液研究在诊断准确性方面显示出有希望的结果,但证据质量较低,无法引入临床指南。一些血清生物标志物可能有助于早期检测子宫内膜异位症或区分卵巢子宫内膜异位症与其他良性卵巢肿块,但证据不足以得出有意义的结论。结论没有一种生物标志物在研究环境之外的临床应用中显示出足够的准确性,但这一领域的研究仍有前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis
Introduction. Endometriosis is a disease characterized by an overgrowth of morphologically and functionally endometrium-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. Early diagnosis of endometriosis is very difficult. The gold standard for diagnosis is the surgical method − laparoscopy, performed for infertility, pelvic pain or the presence of pelvic masses. However, this approach is currently being reconsidered, and the search for endometriosis markers for earlier diagnosis of this disease is relevant.The purpose of the literature review was to summarize the current data on promising noninvasive markers of endometriosis determined in various biological media.Materials and methods. Scientific literature was searched in PubMed, ResearchGate, and Elibrary databases for 2017−2022 using a combination of Russian and English keywords: endometriosis, endometrioma, endometriosis pathogenesis, peritoneal fluid, biomarkers, serum markers.Results. We evaluated more than 30 putative biomarkers in peritoneal fluid, serum, urine, and saliva, as well as their combinations in publications that met the selection criteria. Studies have evaluated the diagnostic value and efficacy of endometriosis biomarkers, but the results of these studies have sometimes been inconsistent. We were unable to identify a single biomarker or combination of biomarkers that was unequivocally clinically useful. The most significant changes in biochemical composition were observed in peritoneal fluid, but it requires invasive intervention to obtain it.Discussion. Saliva and urine studies have shown promising results in terms of diagnostic accuracy, but the evidence was of low quality for introduction into clinical guidelines. A number of serum biomarkers may be useful either for detecting endometriosis at early stages or for differentiating ovarian endometrioma from other benign ovarian masses, but the evidence for meaningful conclusions is insufficient. Conclusion None of the biomarkers have shown sufficient accuracy for clinical use outside of the research environment, yet research in this area remains promising.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信