争议问题:数字技术时代的版权改革

S. Baird
{"title":"争议问题:数字技术时代的版权改革","authors":"S. Baird","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1520161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author offers a timely, sweeping and detailed survey of current events, public and public interest reaction to and media coverage of copyright reform efforts to address illegal file-sharing of copyrighted works. Prepared for the ongoing copyright reform consultation in Hong Kong, the article provides background on the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and WIPO Performances and Phonogram Treaty (WPPT) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) with a particular focus on circumvention of technical protection measures (TPM) and fair use (fair dealing), and the DMCA Section 1201 Triennial Review. Against that background, the author surveys current reform efforts including \"graduated response\" (or \"three strikes and you are out\") proposals, including Internet Service Provider (ISP) liability and responsibilities, in the United Kingdon (including Digital Britain Report and subsequent government actions), New Zealand, Australia, South Korea, and elsewhere, events surrounding broader reform proposals in Canada, and those events in the EU with regard to copyright reform (with attention to the efforts to characterize internet access as a human right, including telecommunications act amendments), and in EU Member States including France (the enactment of the HADOPI law), Sweden (in which arrests and convictions of founders of the peer-to-peer Pirate Bay website have led to political action and supported the formation of the Pirate Party), tracing the incubation and initial successes of the Pirate Party in Sweden and Germany, and efforts to expand the party globally, The paper also looks at reaction to Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement negotiations, copyright term extension, and the Google Books settlement with publishers and authors. The author concludes that although there is notable public reaction in some jurisdictions, (1) copyright law has never been a populist area of law, and popular reaction should not be a barrier to good policy making and preservation of the rule of law, (2) reform is demanded by both creators and users, but changes to the law should be made in light of the distinction between user rights and user expectations, the latter being better met by the marketplace, and reforms should protect both the interests of copyright rights holders and the rights of the users of those copyrighted works (such as attention to due process with regard to legal procedures to restrict Internet access).","PeriodicalId":362846,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contentious Issues: Copyright Reform in the Age of Digital Technologies\",\"authors\":\"S. Baird\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1520161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author offers a timely, sweeping and detailed survey of current events, public and public interest reaction to and media coverage of copyright reform efforts to address illegal file-sharing of copyrighted works. Prepared for the ongoing copyright reform consultation in Hong Kong, the article provides background on the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and WIPO Performances and Phonogram Treaty (WPPT) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) with a particular focus on circumvention of technical protection measures (TPM) and fair use (fair dealing), and the DMCA Section 1201 Triennial Review. Against that background, the author surveys current reform efforts including \\\"graduated response\\\" (or \\\"three strikes and you are out\\\") proposals, including Internet Service Provider (ISP) liability and responsibilities, in the United Kingdon (including Digital Britain Report and subsequent government actions), New Zealand, Australia, South Korea, and elsewhere, events surrounding broader reform proposals in Canada, and those events in the EU with regard to copyright reform (with attention to the efforts to characterize internet access as a human right, including telecommunications act amendments), and in EU Member States including France (the enactment of the HADOPI law), Sweden (in which arrests and convictions of founders of the peer-to-peer Pirate Bay website have led to political action and supported the formation of the Pirate Party), tracing the incubation and initial successes of the Pirate Party in Sweden and Germany, and efforts to expand the party globally, The paper also looks at reaction to Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement negotiations, copyright term extension, and the Google Books settlement with publishers and authors. The author concludes that although there is notable public reaction in some jurisdictions, (1) copyright law has never been a populist area of law, and popular reaction should not be a barrier to good policy making and preservation of the rule of law, (2) reform is demanded by both creators and users, but changes to the law should be made in light of the distinction between user rights and user expectations, the latter being better met by the marketplace, and reforms should protect both the interests of copyright rights holders and the rights of the users of those copyrighted works (such as attention to due process with regard to legal procedures to restrict Internet access).\",\"PeriodicalId\":362846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1520161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1520161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作者提供了一个及时,全面和详细的调查时事,公众和公众利益的反应和媒体报道的版权改革努力,以解决非法文件共享版权作品。这篇文章是为香港正在进行的版权改革磋商而编写的,介绍了《世界知识产权组织版权条约》(WCT)和《世界知识产权组织表演和录音制品条约》(WPPT)以及《数字千年版权法》(DMCA)的背景,特别侧重于规避技术保护措施(TPM)和合理使用(公平处理),以及《数字千年版权法》第1201条三年期审查。在此背景下,作者调查了英国(包括《数字英国报告》和随后的政府行动)、新西兰、澳大利亚、韩国等地当前的改革努力,包括“渐进式回应”(或“三击即出局”)建议,包括互联网服务提供商(ISP)的责任和义务,以及围绕加拿大更广泛改革建议的事件。以及欧盟关于版权改革的事件(关注将互联网接入视为一项人权的努力,包括电信法案修正案),以及包括法国(HADOPI法的颁布),瑞典(逮捕和定罪p2p海盗湾网站的创始人导致了政治行动,并支持了海盗党的成立)在内的欧盟成员国的事件,追踪海盗党在瑞典和德国的孵化和最初的成功,以及在全球范围内扩大该党的努力,本文还关注了反假冒贸易协议谈判、版权期限延长以及谷歌图书与出版商和作者的和解的反应。作者的结论是,尽管在某些司法管辖区存在明显的公众反应,但(1)版权法从来就不是一个民粹主义的法律领域,公众的反应不应成为良好政策制定和维护法治的障碍;(2)改革是创作者和用户都要求的,但对法律的修改应考虑到用户权利和用户期望之间的区别,后者更能得到市场的满足。改革应既保护版权所有者的利益,也保护这些版权作品的使用者的权利(例如,在限制互联网接入的法律程序方面注意正当程序)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contentious Issues: Copyright Reform in the Age of Digital Technologies
Author offers a timely, sweeping and detailed survey of current events, public and public interest reaction to and media coverage of copyright reform efforts to address illegal file-sharing of copyrighted works. Prepared for the ongoing copyright reform consultation in Hong Kong, the article provides background on the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and WIPO Performances and Phonogram Treaty (WPPT) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) with a particular focus on circumvention of technical protection measures (TPM) and fair use (fair dealing), and the DMCA Section 1201 Triennial Review. Against that background, the author surveys current reform efforts including "graduated response" (or "three strikes and you are out") proposals, including Internet Service Provider (ISP) liability and responsibilities, in the United Kingdon (including Digital Britain Report and subsequent government actions), New Zealand, Australia, South Korea, and elsewhere, events surrounding broader reform proposals in Canada, and those events in the EU with regard to copyright reform (with attention to the efforts to characterize internet access as a human right, including telecommunications act amendments), and in EU Member States including France (the enactment of the HADOPI law), Sweden (in which arrests and convictions of founders of the peer-to-peer Pirate Bay website have led to political action and supported the formation of the Pirate Party), tracing the incubation and initial successes of the Pirate Party in Sweden and Germany, and efforts to expand the party globally, The paper also looks at reaction to Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement negotiations, copyright term extension, and the Google Books settlement with publishers and authors. The author concludes that although there is notable public reaction in some jurisdictions, (1) copyright law has never been a populist area of law, and popular reaction should not be a barrier to good policy making and preservation of the rule of law, (2) reform is demanded by both creators and users, but changes to the law should be made in light of the distinction between user rights and user expectations, the latter being better met by the marketplace, and reforms should protect both the interests of copyright rights holders and the rights of the users of those copyrighted works (such as attention to due process with regard to legal procedures to restrict Internet access).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信