通过对语言学习者认知特征的探索,确定输入所必需的元认知要素

W. Rathnayake
{"title":"通过对语言学习者认知特征的探索,确定输入所必需的元认知要素","authors":"W. Rathnayake","doi":"10.4038/SUSLJ.V16I1.7712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive theory emphasizes language learning as a conscious and reasoned thinking process involved in the use of deliberate learning strategies. Exploration of the cognitive characteristics of learner provides benchmarks  to dene metacognitive components required, thus easing the planning of input in an English as Second Language (ESL) classroom. In view of espousing deliberate learning strategies in input, this study identies due metacognitive components for ESL input upon diagnosing the cognitive characteristics of learners. The research questions include, what cognitive strategies learners do possess, what correlative natures are visible in cognitive strategies in learner possession, and which metacognitive components are to be espoused in ESL input. Proposing a questionnaire aligned with the taxonomy of metacognition, its viability for investigating prevalent learner cognitive/metacognitive characteristics is tested. The survey among 110 engineering undergraduates provides qualitative data about learner traits re ective of metacognitive behaviors. Responses were collected in a Likert scale corresponding to a dened metacognitive scale, and the cumulative means of the responses against each aspect of metacognition are stratied in a radar chart forming the learner portfolio of metacognitive strategy in use. Correlative tests are executed among prevailing cognitive traits seeking evidences for the unied nature of learner metacognitive behaviours. Results proved the prevalence of metacognitive strategies through evidences of learners' metacognitive feelings and judgements besides a proven correlation among planning, monitoring and control behaviors towards enabling metacognitive feelings/judgements. Precision of the diagnostic tool and the cohesive visibility of the metacognitive portfolio remain signicant results with opportunity for further research.","PeriodicalId":363402,"journal":{"name":"Sabaragamuwa University Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ascertaining Requisite Metacognitive Elements of Input through the Exploration of Language Learners' Cognitive Characteristics\",\"authors\":\"W. Rathnayake\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/SUSLJ.V16I1.7712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cognitive theory emphasizes language learning as a conscious and reasoned thinking process involved in the use of deliberate learning strategies. Exploration of the cognitive characteristics of learner provides benchmarks  to dene metacognitive components required, thus easing the planning of input in an English as Second Language (ESL) classroom. In view of espousing deliberate learning strategies in input, this study identies due metacognitive components for ESL input upon diagnosing the cognitive characteristics of learners. The research questions include, what cognitive strategies learners do possess, what correlative natures are visible in cognitive strategies in learner possession, and which metacognitive components are to be espoused in ESL input. Proposing a questionnaire aligned with the taxonomy of metacognition, its viability for investigating prevalent learner cognitive/metacognitive characteristics is tested. The survey among 110 engineering undergraduates provides qualitative data about learner traits re ective of metacognitive behaviors. Responses were collected in a Likert scale corresponding to a dened metacognitive scale, and the cumulative means of the responses against each aspect of metacognition are stratied in a radar chart forming the learner portfolio of metacognitive strategy in use. Correlative tests are executed among prevailing cognitive traits seeking evidences for the unied nature of learner metacognitive behaviours. Results proved the prevalence of metacognitive strategies through evidences of learners' metacognitive feelings and judgements besides a proven correlation among planning, monitoring and control behaviors towards enabling metacognitive feelings/judgements. Precision of the diagnostic tool and the cohesive visibility of the metacognitive portfolio remain signicant results with opportunity for further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sabaragamuwa University Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sabaragamuwa University Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/SUSLJ.V16I1.7712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sabaragamuwa University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SUSLJ.V16I1.7712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

认知理论强调语言学习是一个有意识和理性的思维过程,涉及到使用有意识的学习策略。对学习者认知特征的探索为确定所需的元认知成分提供了基准,从而简化了英语作为第二语言(ESL)课堂输入的规划。本研究支持在输入中采用刻意学习策略,在诊断学习者认知特征的基础上,确定了ESL输入中应有的元认知成分。研究的问题包括:学习者拥有哪些认知策略,学习者拥有的认知策略中有哪些相关性质,以及在ESL输入中应该支持哪些元认知成分。提出了一份与元认知分类法相一致的调查问卷,并对其在调查学习者普遍认知/元认知特征方面的可行性进行了测试。通过对110名工科本科生的调查,提供了有关元认知行为的学习者特征的定性数据。在李克特量表中收集了相应的元认知量表,并在雷达图中对每个元认知方面的反应的累积手段进行分层,形成学习者使用的元认知策略组合。对主要认知特征进行相关测试,为学习者元认知行为的统一性寻找证据。结果通过学习者的元认知感受和判断的证据证明了元认知策略的普遍性,并证明了计划、监视和控制行为与元认知感受/判断的实现之间存在相关性。诊断工具的准确性和元认知组合的内聚可见性仍然是进一步研究的重要结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ascertaining Requisite Metacognitive Elements of Input through the Exploration of Language Learners' Cognitive Characteristics
Cognitive theory emphasizes language learning as a conscious and reasoned thinking process involved in the use of deliberate learning strategies. Exploration of the cognitive characteristics of learner provides benchmarks  to dene metacognitive components required, thus easing the planning of input in an English as Second Language (ESL) classroom. In view of espousing deliberate learning strategies in input, this study identies due metacognitive components for ESL input upon diagnosing the cognitive characteristics of learners. The research questions include, what cognitive strategies learners do possess, what correlative natures are visible in cognitive strategies in learner possession, and which metacognitive components are to be espoused in ESL input. Proposing a questionnaire aligned with the taxonomy of metacognition, its viability for investigating prevalent learner cognitive/metacognitive characteristics is tested. The survey among 110 engineering undergraduates provides qualitative data about learner traits re ective of metacognitive behaviors. Responses were collected in a Likert scale corresponding to a dened metacognitive scale, and the cumulative means of the responses against each aspect of metacognition are stratied in a radar chart forming the learner portfolio of metacognitive strategy in use. Correlative tests are executed among prevailing cognitive traits seeking evidences for the unied nature of learner metacognitive behaviours. Results proved the prevalence of metacognitive strategies through evidences of learners' metacognitive feelings and judgements besides a proven correlation among planning, monitoring and control behaviors towards enabling metacognitive feelings/judgements. Precision of the diagnostic tool and the cohesive visibility of the metacognitive portfolio remain signicant results with opportunity for further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信