不同测试频率的非音调刺激是否有助于幼儿的听力评估

R. Massie, H. Dillon, T. Ching, G. Birtles
{"title":"不同测试频率的非音调刺激是否有助于幼儿的听力评估","authors":"R. Massie, H. Dillon, T. Ching, G. Birtles","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.28.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study reports on the findings of the second phase of a larger project to develop a computer-aided program for the hearing assessment of young children. The aim was to investigate whether a diversity of stimuli at each test frequency assists in maintaining the interest of the child for a longer duration than a constantly repeated stimulus when using Behavioural Observation Audiometry (BOA) and Visual Reinforcement Audiometry (VRA). A set of 10 stimuli was selected, 5 centred at 1000 Hz and 5 centred at 4000 Hz. They were: 1000 Hz warble tone, speech /ala/, noisemaker (synthetic melody), environmental (dog barking, music box), 4000 Hz warble tone, speech/isi/, noisemakers (nonreed squeaker, manchester rattle), and an environmental sound (telephone ringing). Forty babies and toddlers between the ages of 4 months and 20 months participated in the study. The findings indicated there was no significant effect of variable stimuli for the younger children assessed using BOA. For older children assessed using VRA, there was a significant beneficial effect of the variable stimuli at 1000 Hz, but not for those at 4000 Hz.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a Diversity of Nontonal Stimuli at Each Test Frequency Assist in the Hearing Assessment of Young Children\",\"authors\":\"R. Massie, H. Dillon, T. Ching, G. Birtles\",\"doi\":\"10.1375/AUDI.28.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study reports on the findings of the second phase of a larger project to develop a computer-aided program for the hearing assessment of young children. The aim was to investigate whether a diversity of stimuli at each test frequency assists in maintaining the interest of the child for a longer duration than a constantly repeated stimulus when using Behavioural Observation Audiometry (BOA) and Visual Reinforcement Audiometry (VRA). A set of 10 stimuli was selected, 5 centred at 1000 Hz and 5 centred at 4000 Hz. They were: 1000 Hz warble tone, speech /ala/, noisemaker (synthetic melody), environmental (dog barking, music box), 4000 Hz warble tone, speech/isi/, noisemakers (nonreed squeaker, manchester rattle), and an environmental sound (telephone ringing). Forty babies and toddlers between the ages of 4 months and 20 months participated in the study. The findings indicated there was no significant effect of variable stimuli for the younger children assessed using BOA. For older children assessed using VRA, there was a significant beneficial effect of the variable stimuli at 1000 Hz, but not for those at 4000 Hz.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.28.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.28.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究报告了一项大型项目的第二阶段的研究结果,该项目旨在开发一种用于幼儿听力评估的计算机辅助程序。目的是研究在使用行为观察听力学(BOA)和视觉强化听力学(VRA)时,不同测试频率的刺激是否比不断重复的刺激更能帮助儿童维持更长时间的兴趣。一组10个刺激被选择,5个以1000赫兹为中心,5个以4000赫兹为中心。它们是:1000赫兹的颤音,语音/ala/,噪音制造器(合成旋律),环境(狗叫,音乐盒),4000赫兹的颤音,语音/isi/,噪音制造器(非簧片吱吱声,曼彻斯特摇铃)和环境声音(电话铃声)。40名年龄在4个月到20个月之间的婴幼儿参加了这项研究。研究结果表明,可变刺激对年龄较小的儿童没有显著的影响。对于使用VRA评估的年龄较大的儿童,1000 Hz的可变刺激有显著的有益效果,而4000 Hz的则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does a Diversity of Nontonal Stimuli at Each Test Frequency Assist in the Hearing Assessment of Young Children
This study reports on the findings of the second phase of a larger project to develop a computer-aided program for the hearing assessment of young children. The aim was to investigate whether a diversity of stimuli at each test frequency assists in maintaining the interest of the child for a longer duration than a constantly repeated stimulus when using Behavioural Observation Audiometry (BOA) and Visual Reinforcement Audiometry (VRA). A set of 10 stimuli was selected, 5 centred at 1000 Hz and 5 centred at 4000 Hz. They were: 1000 Hz warble tone, speech /ala/, noisemaker (synthetic melody), environmental (dog barking, music box), 4000 Hz warble tone, speech/isi/, noisemakers (nonreed squeaker, manchester rattle), and an environmental sound (telephone ringing). Forty babies and toddlers between the ages of 4 months and 20 months participated in the study. The findings indicated there was no significant effect of variable stimuli for the younger children assessed using BOA. For older children assessed using VRA, there was a significant beneficial effect of the variable stimuli at 1000 Hz, but not for those at 4000 Hz.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信