新信息技术与社会不平等:重置研究和政策议程

Inf. Soc. Pub Date : 2000-03-01 DOI:10.1080/019722400128347
Rubin Patterson, E. J. Wilson
{"title":"新信息技术与社会不平等:重置研究和政策议程","authors":"Rubin Patterson, E. J. Wilson","doi":"10.1080/019722400128347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) such as the Internet and the World Wide Web a boon to poor countries and poor people around the globe, enabling them to leapfrog their underdevelopment and become equal partners in an emerging global order? Or, have the new technologies , introduced into an asymmetric global system, already become an engine of greater social inequality? There are few questions more important to the evolution of the global system, and few questions on which there is less agreement. Yes, the new ICTs are unequivocally an engine of inequality, according to the highly respected UN Development Program’s (UNDP) annual publication, “The Human Development Report.” The UNDP Ž nds that, “The Internet is contributing to an ever-widening gap between rich and poor which has now reached ‘grotesque’ proportions” (UNDP Press Release, 12 July 1999, p. 1). But according to the highly respected annual “World Development Report” (WDR) of the World Bank the new ICTs are quite positive and have tremendous equalizing potential. The WDR points to dozens of stories showing that telemedicine, distance education, and falling ICT costs are having positive and dramatic impacts on the growth prospects of poor people and poor countries (Knowledge for Development, World Development Report, 1998/99). It seems that for the World Bank, the glass is more than half-full. For the UNDP, it is less than half-empty. If one thing is clear, it is that highly contested questions have bubbled to the surface regarding the impacts of the new ICTs on the poor. It is precisely at such moments that research and scholarship can make a valuable global contribution . For example, researchers can rephrase the World Bank-UNDP dispute as follows: “What will it take for countries and international organizations to achieve the positive outcomes described by the Bank and avoid the negative consequences described by the UNDP?” And,","PeriodicalId":259468,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Soc.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New IT and Social Inequality: resetting the research and Policy Agenda\",\"authors\":\"Rubin Patterson, E. J. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/019722400128347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Are new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) such as the Internet and the World Wide Web a boon to poor countries and poor people around the globe, enabling them to leapfrog their underdevelopment and become equal partners in an emerging global order? Or, have the new technologies , introduced into an asymmetric global system, already become an engine of greater social inequality? There are few questions more important to the evolution of the global system, and few questions on which there is less agreement. Yes, the new ICTs are unequivocally an engine of inequality, according to the highly respected UN Development Program’s (UNDP) annual publication, “The Human Development Report.” The UNDP Ž nds that, “The Internet is contributing to an ever-widening gap between rich and poor which has now reached ‘grotesque’ proportions” (UNDP Press Release, 12 July 1999, p. 1). But according to the highly respected annual “World Development Report” (WDR) of the World Bank the new ICTs are quite positive and have tremendous equalizing potential. The WDR points to dozens of stories showing that telemedicine, distance education, and falling ICT costs are having positive and dramatic impacts on the growth prospects of poor people and poor countries (Knowledge for Development, World Development Report, 1998/99). It seems that for the World Bank, the glass is more than half-full. For the UNDP, it is less than half-empty. If one thing is clear, it is that highly contested questions have bubbled to the surface regarding the impacts of the new ICTs on the poor. It is precisely at such moments that research and scholarship can make a valuable global contribution . For example, researchers can rephrase the World Bank-UNDP dispute as follows: “What will it take for countries and international organizations to achieve the positive outcomes described by the Bank and avoid the negative consequences described by the UNDP?” And,\",\"PeriodicalId\":259468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inf. Soc.\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inf. Soc.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/019722400128347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/019722400128347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

互联网和万维网等新的信息和通信技术(ict)是否对全球贫困国家和贫困人口有利,使他们能够跳过不发达阶段,成为新兴全球秩序中的平等伙伴?或者,被引入不对称的全球体系的新技术,是否已经成为加剧社会不平等的引擎?对于全球体系的演变来说,没有什么问题比这更重要了,也没有什么问题比这更不一致了。的确,联合国开发计划署备受推崇的年度出版物《人类发展报告》指出,新的信息通信技术无疑是不平等的推手。联合国开发计划署指出,“互联网正在使贫富差距不断扩大,目前已达到‘怪诞’的程度”(联合国开发计划署新闻稿,1999年7月12日,第1页)。但根据世界银行备受推崇的年度《世界发展报告》(WDR),新的信息通信技术是相当积极的,具有巨大的平衡潜力。《世界发展报告》指出,有几十个事例表明,远程医疗、远程教育和信息通信技术成本的下降正在对贫困人口和贫困国家的增长前景产生积极和巨大的影响(《知识促进发展》,《世界发展报告》,1998/99年)。看来,对于世界银行来说,杯子已经满了一半以上。对于联合国开发计划署来说,它还不到半空。如果说有一件事是明确的,那就是关于新信息通信技术对穷人的影响的高度争议的问题已经浮出水面。正是在这样的时刻,研究和学术才能对全球作出宝贵的贡献。例如,研究人员可以将世界银行与开发计划署之间的争端重新表述如下:“各国和国际组织如何才能实现世界银行所描述的积极成果,并避免开发计划署所描述的消极后果?”而且,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New IT and Social Inequality: resetting the research and Policy Agenda
Are new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) such as the Internet and the World Wide Web a boon to poor countries and poor people around the globe, enabling them to leapfrog their underdevelopment and become equal partners in an emerging global order? Or, have the new technologies , introduced into an asymmetric global system, already become an engine of greater social inequality? There are few questions more important to the evolution of the global system, and few questions on which there is less agreement. Yes, the new ICTs are unequivocally an engine of inequality, according to the highly respected UN Development Program’s (UNDP) annual publication, “The Human Development Report.” The UNDP Ž nds that, “The Internet is contributing to an ever-widening gap between rich and poor which has now reached ‘grotesque’ proportions” (UNDP Press Release, 12 July 1999, p. 1). But according to the highly respected annual “World Development Report” (WDR) of the World Bank the new ICTs are quite positive and have tremendous equalizing potential. The WDR points to dozens of stories showing that telemedicine, distance education, and falling ICT costs are having positive and dramatic impacts on the growth prospects of poor people and poor countries (Knowledge for Development, World Development Report, 1998/99). It seems that for the World Bank, the glass is more than half-full. For the UNDP, it is less than half-empty. If one thing is clear, it is that highly contested questions have bubbled to the surface regarding the impacts of the new ICTs on the poor. It is precisely at such moments that research and scholarship can make a valuable global contribution . For example, researchers can rephrase the World Bank-UNDP dispute as follows: “What will it take for countries and international organizations to achieve the positive outcomes described by the Bank and avoid the negative consequences described by the UNDP?” And,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信