不确定性下的决策:经典模型

A. Chateauneuf, M. Cohen, J. Jaffray
{"title":"不确定性下的决策:经典模型","authors":"A. Chateauneuf, M. Cohen, J. Jaffray","doi":"10.1002/9780470611876.CH9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapiter of a collective book is dedicated to classical decision models under uncertainty, i.e. under situations where events do not have \"objective\" probabilities with which the Decision Marker agrees. We present successively the two main theories, their axiomatic, the interpretation and the justification of their axioms and their main properties : first, the general model of Subjective Expected Utility due to Savage (Savage, 1954), second, the Anscombe-Aumann (1963) theory, in a different framework. Both theories enforce the universal use of a probabilistic representation. We then discuss this issue in connection with the experimental result known as the Ellsberg paradox.","PeriodicalId":112888,"journal":{"name":"Decision-making Process","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision under Uncertainty: The Classical Models\",\"authors\":\"A. Chateauneuf, M. Cohen, J. Jaffray\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780470611876.CH9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapiter of a collective book is dedicated to classical decision models under uncertainty, i.e. under situations where events do not have \\\"objective\\\" probabilities with which the Decision Marker agrees. We present successively the two main theories, their axiomatic, the interpretation and the justification of their axioms and their main properties : first, the general model of Subjective Expected Utility due to Savage (Savage, 1954), second, the Anscombe-Aumann (1963) theory, in a different framework. Both theories enforce the universal use of a probabilistic representation. We then discuss this issue in connection with the experimental result known as the Ellsberg paradox.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision-making Process\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision-making Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470611876.CH9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision-making Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470611876.CH9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

集体书的这一章专门讨论不确定性下的经典决策模型,即在事件不具有决策标记者同意的“客观”概率的情况下。我们先后介绍了两种主要理论,它们的公理,它们的公理及其主要性质的解释和证明:第一,萨维奇(Savage, 1954)提出的主观预期效用的一般模型,第二,安斯科姆-奥曼(1963)理论,在不同的框架下。两种理论都强制普遍使用概率表示。然后我们将这个问题与艾尔斯伯格悖论的实验结果联系起来讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision under Uncertainty: The Classical Models
This chapiter of a collective book is dedicated to classical decision models under uncertainty, i.e. under situations where events do not have "objective" probabilities with which the Decision Marker agrees. We present successively the two main theories, their axiomatic, the interpretation and the justification of their axioms and their main properties : first, the general model of Subjective Expected Utility due to Savage (Savage, 1954), second, the Anscombe-Aumann (1963) theory, in a different framework. Both theories enforce the universal use of a probabilistic representation. We then discuss this issue in connection with the experimental result known as the Ellsberg paradox.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信