E. Grammatopoulou, Dimitra Sdravou, Foteini Gkiliri, Aikaterini Bourtzi, Artemisia Polymerou, S. Metallidis, E. Geka, G. Koumantakis, A. Christakou, Afrodite Evangelodimou
{"title":"icu后物理治疗对COVID-19患者呼吸和身体功能状态的影响:一项初步研究","authors":"E. Grammatopoulou, Dimitra Sdravou, Foteini Gkiliri, Aikaterini Bourtzi, Artemisia Polymerou, S. Metallidis, E. Geka, G. Koumantakis, A. Christakou, Afrodite Evangelodimou","doi":"10.3390/iecmd2021-10311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: According to recent physiotherapy recommendations (WHO, WCPT, 2020) for patients with COVID-19, after discharge from an ICU, they are expected to experience respiratory, physical, cognitive, and psychological problems due to the duration and nature of the immobilization and sedation, ventilation duration, and underlying morbidity. Moreover, only patients with a limitation in physical capacity and/or physical activity have an indication for physiotherapy. However, little is known about the effect of physiotherapy treatment on the functional capacity of patients with COVID-19. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to provide information for the effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention on the respiratory and physical functional status of patients with COVID-19, since there will be a great demand for physiotherapy treatment for these people soon. Materials and Methods: The Ethics Committee of the AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece granted approval for this study. This pilot clinical study was conducted from March to June 2020. The sample consisted of 11 patients with COVID-19, discharged from an ICU and hospitalized in the COVID-19 clinic of AHEPA University Hospital. All participants had an indication for physiotherapy, according to the recommendations, and a medical referral as well. The duration of their hospitalization ranged from two to six weeks. Among participants, there were seven males and four females, aged from 44–75 yrs, five smokers and six nonsmokers, four obese and seven nonobese. According to the recommendations, physiotherapy intervention was tailored to the patients’ needs and goals. Breathing exercises, early mobilization, and self-management for daily living were performed once a day, for five days a week, as tolerated. Measurement tools: Pulse oximeter (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), the Borg scale (intensity of dyspnea), Medical Research Council scale for disability (MRCd), clinical evaluation for dysfunctional breathing (DB), Medical Research Council scale for muscle strength (MRCms), Berg balance scale, Sit to Stand test (leg strength and endurance), Time Up and Go test (TUG) (general mobility), 1 min walk test (1MWT) (aerobic capacity), and the Barthel Index (BI) (performance in daily activities). For the purposes of the study, two measurements were conducted: at admission and at discharge from the COVID-19 clinic. Results: Dependent sample tests showed a significant effect (p < 0.001) for the recommended physiotherapy treatment on respiratory variables: 6.9 (1.4)% for SpO2, 3.4 (0.9) breaths for respiratory rate, and 5.0 (1.3) for the Borg scale score. Significant improvements (p < 0.001) were additionally noted for physical functioning: 25.3 (13.0) for the Berg balance scale, 18.5 (11.2) for the MRCms score, 3 (1.3) s for the Sit to Stand test, 40.4 (40.6) s for the TUG efforts, 44.1 (25.5) s for 1MWT, and 65.9 (20.2) for BI. All patients displayed DB at admission to the COVID-19 clinic, while nine of them adopted a diaphragmatic breathing pattern at discharge. At admission to the COVID-19 clinic, all patients were at level five disability (MRCd), whereas at discharge 10 out of 11 patients improved (three at level four, four at level three, and three at level two). Conclusions: The present pilot study provided first evidence for the effectiveness of the WHO and WCPT physiotherapy recommendations on the respiratory and physical functioning status of patients with COVID-19. Further studies are needed to support these early findings.","PeriodicalId":147460,"journal":{"name":"Medical Sciences Forum","volume":"498 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Post-ICU Physiotherapy on Respiratory and Physical Functioning Status in Patients with COVID-19: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"E. Grammatopoulou, Dimitra Sdravou, Foteini Gkiliri, Aikaterini Bourtzi, Artemisia Polymerou, S. Metallidis, E. Geka, G. Koumantakis, A. Christakou, Afrodite Evangelodimou\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/iecmd2021-10311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: According to recent physiotherapy recommendations (WHO, WCPT, 2020) for patients with COVID-19, after discharge from an ICU, they are expected to experience respiratory, physical, cognitive, and psychological problems due to the duration and nature of the immobilization and sedation, ventilation duration, and underlying morbidity. Moreover, only patients with a limitation in physical capacity and/or physical activity have an indication for physiotherapy. However, little is known about the effect of physiotherapy treatment on the functional capacity of patients with COVID-19. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to provide information for the effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention on the respiratory and physical functional status of patients with COVID-19, since there will be a great demand for physiotherapy treatment for these people soon. Materials and Methods: The Ethics Committee of the AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece granted approval for this study. This pilot clinical study was conducted from March to June 2020. The sample consisted of 11 patients with COVID-19, discharged from an ICU and hospitalized in the COVID-19 clinic of AHEPA University Hospital. All participants had an indication for physiotherapy, according to the recommendations, and a medical referral as well. The duration of their hospitalization ranged from two to six weeks. Among participants, there were seven males and four females, aged from 44–75 yrs, five smokers and six nonsmokers, four obese and seven nonobese. According to the recommendations, physiotherapy intervention was tailored to the patients’ needs and goals. Breathing exercises, early mobilization, and self-management for daily living were performed once a day, for five days a week, as tolerated. Measurement tools: Pulse oximeter (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), the Borg scale (intensity of dyspnea), Medical Research Council scale for disability (MRCd), clinical evaluation for dysfunctional breathing (DB), Medical Research Council scale for muscle strength (MRCms), Berg balance scale, Sit to Stand test (leg strength and endurance), Time Up and Go test (TUG) (general mobility), 1 min walk test (1MWT) (aerobic capacity), and the Barthel Index (BI) (performance in daily activities). For the purposes of the study, two measurements were conducted: at admission and at discharge from the COVID-19 clinic. Results: Dependent sample tests showed a significant effect (p < 0.001) for the recommended physiotherapy treatment on respiratory variables: 6.9 (1.4)% for SpO2, 3.4 (0.9) breaths for respiratory rate, and 5.0 (1.3) for the Borg scale score. Significant improvements (p < 0.001) were additionally noted for physical functioning: 25.3 (13.0) for the Berg balance scale, 18.5 (11.2) for the MRCms score, 3 (1.3) s for the Sit to Stand test, 40.4 (40.6) s for the TUG efforts, 44.1 (25.5) s for 1MWT, and 65.9 (20.2) for BI. All patients displayed DB at admission to the COVID-19 clinic, while nine of them adopted a diaphragmatic breathing pattern at discharge. At admission to the COVID-19 clinic, all patients were at level five disability (MRCd), whereas at discharge 10 out of 11 patients improved (three at level four, four at level three, and three at level two). Conclusions: The present pilot study provided first evidence for the effectiveness of the WHO and WCPT physiotherapy recommendations on the respiratory and physical functioning status of patients with COVID-19. Further studies are needed to support these early findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Sciences Forum\",\"volume\":\"498 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Sciences Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/iecmd2021-10311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Sciences Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/iecmd2021-10311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:根据最近对COVID-19患者的物理治疗建议(WHO, WCPT, 2020),在从ICU出院后,由于固定和镇静的持续时间和性质、通气时间和潜在的发病率,患者预计会出现呼吸、身体、认知和心理问题。此外,只有身体能力和/或体力活动受限的患者才有物理治疗的指征。然而,物理治疗对COVID-19患者功能能力的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是为物理治疗干预对COVID-19患者呼吸和身体功能状态的有效性提供信息,因为这些患者很快就会有很大的物理治疗需求。材料和方法:希腊塞萨洛尼基亚里士多德大学医学院卫生科学学院AHEPA大学医院伦理委员会批准了本研究。该试点临床研究于2020年3月至6月进行。样本包括11例从ICU出院并在AHEPA大学医院COVID-19门诊住院的COVID-19患者。根据建议,所有参与者都有物理治疗的指征,也有医疗转诊。他们的住院时间从两周到六周不等。在参与者中,有7名男性和4名女性,年龄在44-75岁之间,5名吸烟者和6名不吸烟者,4名肥胖和7名非肥胖。根据建议,物理治疗干预是根据患者的需要和目标量身定制的。在可容忍的情况下,每天进行一次呼吸练习、早期活动和日常生活自我管理。测量工具:脉搏血氧仪(SpO2)、呼吸频率(RR)、Borg量表(呼吸困难强度)、医学研究委员会残疾量表(MRCd)、呼吸功能障碍临床评估(DB)、医学研究委员会肌肉力量量表(MRCms)、Berg平衡量表、坐立测试(腿部力量和耐力)、Time Up and Go测试(一般活动能力)、1分钟步行测试(1MWT)(有氧能力)和Barthel指数(BI)(日常活动表现)。为了研究的目的,在COVID-19诊所入院和出院时进行了两次测量。结果:依赖样本检验显示,推荐的物理治疗对呼吸变量有显著影响(p < 0.001): SpO2为6.9(1.4)%,呼吸频率为3.4(0.9)次,博格量表评分为5.0(1.3)次。身体功能也有显著改善(p < 0.001): Berg平衡量表25.3 (13.0),MRCms评分18.5(11.2),坐立测试3(1.3)秒,TUG努力40.4(40.6)秒,1MWT 44.1(25.5)秒,BI 65.9(20.2)秒。所有患者在入院时都表现出DB,而其中9名患者在出院时采用横膈膜呼吸模式。入院时,所有患者均为5级残疾(MRCd),而出院时,11名患者中有10名有所改善(3名为4级,4名为3级,3名为2级)。结论:本试点研究为世卫组织和WCPT物理治疗建议对COVID-19患者呼吸和身体功能状况的有效性提供了第一个证据。需要进一步的研究来支持这些早期发现。
The Effect of Post-ICU Physiotherapy on Respiratory and Physical Functioning Status in Patients with COVID-19: A Pilot Study
Background and Objectives: According to recent physiotherapy recommendations (WHO, WCPT, 2020) for patients with COVID-19, after discharge from an ICU, they are expected to experience respiratory, physical, cognitive, and psychological problems due to the duration and nature of the immobilization and sedation, ventilation duration, and underlying morbidity. Moreover, only patients with a limitation in physical capacity and/or physical activity have an indication for physiotherapy. However, little is known about the effect of physiotherapy treatment on the functional capacity of patients with COVID-19. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to provide information for the effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention on the respiratory and physical functional status of patients with COVID-19, since there will be a great demand for physiotherapy treatment for these people soon. Materials and Methods: The Ethics Committee of the AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece granted approval for this study. This pilot clinical study was conducted from March to June 2020. The sample consisted of 11 patients with COVID-19, discharged from an ICU and hospitalized in the COVID-19 clinic of AHEPA University Hospital. All participants had an indication for physiotherapy, according to the recommendations, and a medical referral as well. The duration of their hospitalization ranged from two to six weeks. Among participants, there were seven males and four females, aged from 44–75 yrs, five smokers and six nonsmokers, four obese and seven nonobese. According to the recommendations, physiotherapy intervention was tailored to the patients’ needs and goals. Breathing exercises, early mobilization, and self-management for daily living were performed once a day, for five days a week, as tolerated. Measurement tools: Pulse oximeter (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), the Borg scale (intensity of dyspnea), Medical Research Council scale for disability (MRCd), clinical evaluation for dysfunctional breathing (DB), Medical Research Council scale for muscle strength (MRCms), Berg balance scale, Sit to Stand test (leg strength and endurance), Time Up and Go test (TUG) (general mobility), 1 min walk test (1MWT) (aerobic capacity), and the Barthel Index (BI) (performance in daily activities). For the purposes of the study, two measurements were conducted: at admission and at discharge from the COVID-19 clinic. Results: Dependent sample tests showed a significant effect (p < 0.001) for the recommended physiotherapy treatment on respiratory variables: 6.9 (1.4)% for SpO2, 3.4 (0.9) breaths for respiratory rate, and 5.0 (1.3) for the Borg scale score. Significant improvements (p < 0.001) were additionally noted for physical functioning: 25.3 (13.0) for the Berg balance scale, 18.5 (11.2) for the MRCms score, 3 (1.3) s for the Sit to Stand test, 40.4 (40.6) s for the TUG efforts, 44.1 (25.5) s for 1MWT, and 65.9 (20.2) for BI. All patients displayed DB at admission to the COVID-19 clinic, while nine of them adopted a diaphragmatic breathing pattern at discharge. At admission to the COVID-19 clinic, all patients were at level five disability (MRCd), whereas at discharge 10 out of 11 patients improved (three at level four, four at level three, and three at level two). Conclusions: The present pilot study provided first evidence for the effectiveness of the WHO and WCPT physiotherapy recommendations on the respiratory and physical functioning status of patients with COVID-19. Further studies are needed to support these early findings.