没有神奇的公式

K. McArdle, Fintan O'toole, Ulf Dantanus
{"title":"没有神奇的公式","authors":"K. McArdle, Fintan O'toole, Ulf Dantanus","doi":"10.2307/29735402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK now has an Internet censorship system that is used to address various unlawful use of the Internet, but it was initially restricted to blocking images of child sexual abuse. The system is easy to bypass, but it was hoped to reduce the likelihood of people accidentally accessing such images. At any one time there were only a few hundred web addresses blocked, and all entries were manually checked, so it was rare for material to be incorrectly categorised. However, once the blocking system was in place, there was pressure for its remit to be extended. First, the movie and music industries successfully obtained court orders to add entire websites which facilitated access to copyright infringing material. Now the UK government are proposing censoring legal adult websites too (unless the person who pays for the Internet connection requests an opt-out from the blocking system, and proves their identity and age). The system to block adult material is already in place for customers of mobile Internet connections, but due to the huge number of websites now being blocked, the quality of checking of what belongs on the list has gone down. Websites being incorrectly blocked include political parties, news sites, and sexual education information. Measures that started off as blocking of a small number of carefully selected web addresses containing illegal material universally regarded as abhorrent have morphed into the mass censorship of legal material with little or no human intervention. In the US, Internet users can even be disconnected entirely from the Internet if anyone from their household is too frequently accused of infringing copyright; the UK government is one of several others discussing similar measures. Blocking child sexual abuse images does not stop the crime, and for the vast majority of other crimes involving the Internet there are no technical measures which can prevent the crime occurring. Therefore the emphasis in legislation has been on detecting and punishing perpetrators in the hope that it will deter others. One area of rapid growth in this field has been Internet surveillance, with the draft Communications Data Bill being the UK government's latest and most privacy-intrusive proposal yet. This law, if enacted, would allow public bodies to order ISPs to record their customers' activities, even when the customer is not suspected of having committed a crime and where there has been no judicial oversight of the order. The costs of implementing …","PeriodicalId":350627,"journal":{"name":"From Mandate to Blueprint","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Magic Formula\",\"authors\":\"K. McArdle, Fintan O'toole, Ulf Dantanus\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/29735402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The UK now has an Internet censorship system that is used to address various unlawful use of the Internet, but it was initially restricted to blocking images of child sexual abuse. The system is easy to bypass, but it was hoped to reduce the likelihood of people accidentally accessing such images. At any one time there were only a few hundred web addresses blocked, and all entries were manually checked, so it was rare for material to be incorrectly categorised. However, once the blocking system was in place, there was pressure for its remit to be extended. First, the movie and music industries successfully obtained court orders to add entire websites which facilitated access to copyright infringing material. Now the UK government are proposing censoring legal adult websites too (unless the person who pays for the Internet connection requests an opt-out from the blocking system, and proves their identity and age). The system to block adult material is already in place for customers of mobile Internet connections, but due to the huge number of websites now being blocked, the quality of checking of what belongs on the list has gone down. Websites being incorrectly blocked include political parties, news sites, and sexual education information. Measures that started off as blocking of a small number of carefully selected web addresses containing illegal material universally regarded as abhorrent have morphed into the mass censorship of legal material with little or no human intervention. In the US, Internet users can even be disconnected entirely from the Internet if anyone from their household is too frequently accused of infringing copyright; the UK government is one of several others discussing similar measures. Blocking child sexual abuse images does not stop the crime, and for the vast majority of other crimes involving the Internet there are no technical measures which can prevent the crime occurring. Therefore the emphasis in legislation has been on detecting and punishing perpetrators in the hope that it will deter others. One area of rapid growth in this field has been Internet surveillance, with the draft Communications Data Bill being the UK government's latest and most privacy-intrusive proposal yet. This law, if enacted, would allow public bodies to order ISPs to record their customers' activities, even when the customer is not suspected of having committed a crime and where there has been no judicial oversight of the order. The costs of implementing …\",\"PeriodicalId\":350627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"From Mandate to Blueprint\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"From Mandate to Blueprint\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/29735402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From Mandate to Blueprint","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/29735402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国现在有一个互联网审查系统,用来解决各种非法使用互联网的问题,但它最初仅限于阻止儿童性虐待的图像。该系统很容易绕过,但希望能减少人们意外访问此类图像的可能性。在任何时候,只有几百个网址被屏蔽,而且所有条目都是人工检查的,所以很少有材料被错误分类。然而,一旦封锁制度到位,就有压力要求其职权范围扩大。首先,电影和音乐行业成功地获得了法院的命令,增加了整个网站,方便了人们获取侵犯版权的材料。现在,英国政府也提议审查合法的成人网站(除非付费上网的人要求退出屏蔽系统,并证明自己的身份和年龄)。虽然针对移动互联网用户的成人内容屏蔽系统已经到位,但由于目前被屏蔽的网站数量庞大,因此检查列表内容的质量有所下降。被错误屏蔽的网站包括政党、新闻网站和性教育信息。最初的措施是封锁少数精心挑选的包含普遍被认为令人憎恶的非法内容的网址,现在已经演变成对合法材料的大规模审查,几乎没有或根本没有人为干预。在美国,如果家里有人经常被指控侵犯版权,互联网用户甚至可能被完全切断与互联网的联系;英国政府是讨论类似措施的其他几个国家之一。阻止儿童性虐待图像并不能阻止犯罪,对于绝大多数涉及互联网的其他犯罪,没有技术措施可以防止犯罪的发生。因此,立法的重点一直是发现和惩罚犯罪者,希望它能吓阻其他人。这一领域快速增长的一个领域是互联网监控,《通信数据法案》(Communications Data Bill)草案是英国政府迄今为止最新、也是最侵犯隐私的提案。这项法律如果颁布,将允许公共机构命令互联网服务提供商记录其客户的活动,即使客户没有犯罪嫌疑,也没有对该命令进行司法监督。实施的成本…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Magic Formula
The UK now has an Internet censorship system that is used to address various unlawful use of the Internet, but it was initially restricted to blocking images of child sexual abuse. The system is easy to bypass, but it was hoped to reduce the likelihood of people accidentally accessing such images. At any one time there were only a few hundred web addresses blocked, and all entries were manually checked, so it was rare for material to be incorrectly categorised. However, once the blocking system was in place, there was pressure for its remit to be extended. First, the movie and music industries successfully obtained court orders to add entire websites which facilitated access to copyright infringing material. Now the UK government are proposing censoring legal adult websites too (unless the person who pays for the Internet connection requests an opt-out from the blocking system, and proves their identity and age). The system to block adult material is already in place for customers of mobile Internet connections, but due to the huge number of websites now being blocked, the quality of checking of what belongs on the list has gone down. Websites being incorrectly blocked include political parties, news sites, and sexual education information. Measures that started off as blocking of a small number of carefully selected web addresses containing illegal material universally regarded as abhorrent have morphed into the mass censorship of legal material with little or no human intervention. In the US, Internet users can even be disconnected entirely from the Internet if anyone from their household is too frequently accused of infringing copyright; the UK government is one of several others discussing similar measures. Blocking child sexual abuse images does not stop the crime, and for the vast majority of other crimes involving the Internet there are no technical measures which can prevent the crime occurring. Therefore the emphasis in legislation has been on detecting and punishing perpetrators in the hope that it will deter others. One area of rapid growth in this field has been Internet surveillance, with the draft Communications Data Bill being the UK government's latest and most privacy-intrusive proposal yet. This law, if enacted, would allow public bodies to order ISPs to record their customers' activities, even when the customer is not suspected of having committed a crime and where there has been no judicial oversight of the order. The costs of implementing …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信