考虑可信人士的证言证据和积极的证据保全程序

Hyeokki Kim
{"title":"考虑可信人士的证言证据和积极的证据保全程序","authors":"Hyeokki Kim","doi":"10.34222/kdps.2023.15.2.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unconstitutionality of the 'minor' part of Article 30, paragraph 6 of the Special Sexual Violence Act, which was enacted to prevent secondary damage to minors and victims of sexual violence who are mentally or physically incapacitated, has led to a situation where secondary damage to victims of sexual violence who are minors is feared. The reason was that, the purpose of this provision, to prevent secondary victimization, can be achieved through the use of the video relay method and the proper exercise of the judge's courtroom control, and the admission of evidence based solely on the authenticity of a trusted person present would unduly infringe on the accused's right to cross-examine and defense. However, the decision to exclude the application of Article 30(6) of the Special Law on Sexual Violence to all minors without specifying the age range of minors is not a reasonable decision from the perspective of equity with victims who have not fully formed their personality and are forced to recall the time of the crime by attending the public proceedings in any form, as it is bound to have an adverse effect on their personality formation and development. Moreover, there may be circumventive attempts to admit statements made during the investigation without calling the minor victim of sexual assault as a witness, resulting in a serious violation of the accused's right to defense. Therefore, it would be desirable to limit the scope to minors under the age of 13, and as the Constitutional Court stated in its decision, the active participation of the court, as a neutral body, in the investigation process at an early stage of the damage and granting evidentiary power to the statements obtained will help to discover the truth, prevent secondary damage to the victim, and ensure the defense rights of the accused. This will require courts to establish a dedicated organization to implement evidence preservation procedures and to expand their hardware and human infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":384688,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consider of Testimonial evidence from trusted persons and aggressive evidence preservation procedures\",\"authors\":\"Hyeokki Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.34222/kdps.2023.15.2.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The unconstitutionality of the 'minor' part of Article 30, paragraph 6 of the Special Sexual Violence Act, which was enacted to prevent secondary damage to minors and victims of sexual violence who are mentally or physically incapacitated, has led to a situation where secondary damage to victims of sexual violence who are minors is feared. The reason was that, the purpose of this provision, to prevent secondary victimization, can be achieved through the use of the video relay method and the proper exercise of the judge's courtroom control, and the admission of evidence based solely on the authenticity of a trusted person present would unduly infringe on the accused's right to cross-examine and defense. However, the decision to exclude the application of Article 30(6) of the Special Law on Sexual Violence to all minors without specifying the age range of minors is not a reasonable decision from the perspective of equity with victims who have not fully formed their personality and are forced to recall the time of the crime by attending the public proceedings in any form, as it is bound to have an adverse effect on their personality formation and development. Moreover, there may be circumventive attempts to admit statements made during the investigation without calling the minor victim of sexual assault as a witness, resulting in a serious violation of the accused's right to defense. Therefore, it would be desirable to limit the scope to minors under the age of 13, and as the Constitutional Court stated in its decision, the active participation of the court, as a neutral body, in the investigation process at an early stage of the damage and granting evidentiary power to the statements obtained will help to discover the truth, prevent secondary damage to the victim, and ensure the defense rights of the accused. This will require courts to establish a dedicated organization to implement evidence preservation procedures and to expand their hardware and human infrastructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34222/kdps.2023.15.2.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34222/kdps.2023.15.2.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了防止对未成年人和精神或身体上丧失行为能力的性暴力受害者造成二次伤害而制定的《性暴力特别法》第30条第6款中“未成年人”一项违宪,导致了对未成年性暴力受害者造成二次伤害的担忧。理由是,这一规定的目的是防止第二次受害,这可以通过使用录像转播方法和适当行使法官的法庭控制权来实现,而仅仅根据可信的在场人员的真实性接受证据将过分侵犯被告的盘问和辩护权利。但是,在没有明确未成年人的年龄范围的情况下,将《性暴力特别法》第30条第6款的适用范围排除在所有未成年人之外,从对人格尚未完全形成、以任何形式参加公开诉讼而被迫回忆犯罪时间的受害者的公平角度来看,这是不合理的决定,因为这必然会对其人格的形成和发展产生不利影响。此外,还可能存在不传召性侵犯的未成年受害者作为证人而企图承认调查期间所作陈述的规避行为,从而严重侵犯被告的辩护权。因此,最好将适用范围限制在13岁以下的未成年人。宪法法院在判决书中指出,法院作为中立机构,在损害的早期阶段积极参与调查过程,并对获得的陈述给予证据权,将有助于发现真相,防止对受害者的二次损害,并确保被告的辩护权。这将要求法院建立一个专门的组织来执行证据保存程序,并扩大其硬件和人力基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consider of Testimonial evidence from trusted persons and aggressive evidence preservation procedures
The unconstitutionality of the 'minor' part of Article 30, paragraph 6 of the Special Sexual Violence Act, which was enacted to prevent secondary damage to minors and victims of sexual violence who are mentally or physically incapacitated, has led to a situation where secondary damage to victims of sexual violence who are minors is feared. The reason was that, the purpose of this provision, to prevent secondary victimization, can be achieved through the use of the video relay method and the proper exercise of the judge's courtroom control, and the admission of evidence based solely on the authenticity of a trusted person present would unduly infringe on the accused's right to cross-examine and defense. However, the decision to exclude the application of Article 30(6) of the Special Law on Sexual Violence to all minors without specifying the age range of minors is not a reasonable decision from the perspective of equity with victims who have not fully formed their personality and are forced to recall the time of the crime by attending the public proceedings in any form, as it is bound to have an adverse effect on their personality formation and development. Moreover, there may be circumventive attempts to admit statements made during the investigation without calling the minor victim of sexual assault as a witness, resulting in a serious violation of the accused's right to defense. Therefore, it would be desirable to limit the scope to minors under the age of 13, and as the Constitutional Court stated in its decision, the active participation of the court, as a neutral body, in the investigation process at an early stage of the damage and granting evidentiary power to the statements obtained will help to discover the truth, prevent secondary damage to the victim, and ensure the defense rights of the accused. This will require courts to establish a dedicated organization to implement evidence preservation procedures and to expand their hardware and human infrastructure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信