诺莱坞:观众,观众和消费场所

Onookome Okome
{"title":"诺莱坞:观众,观众和消费场所","authors":"Onookome Okome","doi":"10.5040/9781501311680.ch-036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nollywood on the Rise Nollywood, the cinematic phenomenon that was inaugurated in Lagos, has known an unprecedented measure of success in its homeland, Nigeria. It is beginning to make its mark outside this home turf. Since the year 2000, it has gone from one international Film Festival to the other, and the gain it has made in these years has been consistent. In 2002, this author was invited to the second edition of the Festival of African and Caribbean Film, which was held in Barbados. Tunde Kelani, the veteran camera man and producer, who is also one of the icons of Nollywood, was also invited to present one of his video films, Thunderbolt. Jane Bryce, one of the organizers of this Festival, was clearly excited to formally introduce Nollywood to the audience of the island nation of Barbados for the first time. Bryce’s introduction of Nollywood to this audience rephrased what is now “common talk” in the scholarship of the video film to date. It did so from a critical and serious manner, pointing not only to the uniqueness of this medium in the visual culture of Africa but also in the world cinematic expression as a whole. Bryce’s take on Nollywood as an art and industry shows how and why Nollywood compels attention from those outside its field of operation and cultural vision, not that the industry cares for any attention from the outside. In fact, one of the characteristics that marks Nollywood as an autonomous local cinematic expression is that it looks inward and not outward, and one can accurately argue that it does so in all aspects of the production and organization of its operation. Bryce also made the point about the difference between Nollywood and the Francophone cinema of French West Africa that was the touch-bearer of what was known as the African cinema before the emergence of Nollywood. Indeed, as Bryce notes, Nollywood does not “have the opportunities for training and production financing” of Francophone cinema and does not “go to the biennial Pan-African Film Festival (FESPACO) in Burkina Faso.” Yet, it is remarkable in very radical ways. As a result of this success, Nollywood has been able to circumvent the problems that African Francophone filmmakers whine about and has done so successfully in the last twenty years or so. It has moved the discourse of cinematic representation away from the blame game that is obvious and somewhat compellingly","PeriodicalId":415369,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Text","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nollywood: Spectatorship, Audience and the Sites of Consumption\",\"authors\":\"Onookome Okome\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781501311680.ch-036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nollywood on the Rise Nollywood, the cinematic phenomenon that was inaugurated in Lagos, has known an unprecedented measure of success in its homeland, Nigeria. It is beginning to make its mark outside this home turf. Since the year 2000, it has gone from one international Film Festival to the other, and the gain it has made in these years has been consistent. In 2002, this author was invited to the second edition of the Festival of African and Caribbean Film, which was held in Barbados. Tunde Kelani, the veteran camera man and producer, who is also one of the icons of Nollywood, was also invited to present one of his video films, Thunderbolt. Jane Bryce, one of the organizers of this Festival, was clearly excited to formally introduce Nollywood to the audience of the island nation of Barbados for the first time. Bryce’s introduction of Nollywood to this audience rephrased what is now “common talk” in the scholarship of the video film to date. It did so from a critical and serious manner, pointing not only to the uniqueness of this medium in the visual culture of Africa but also in the world cinematic expression as a whole. Bryce’s take on Nollywood as an art and industry shows how and why Nollywood compels attention from those outside its field of operation and cultural vision, not that the industry cares for any attention from the outside. In fact, one of the characteristics that marks Nollywood as an autonomous local cinematic expression is that it looks inward and not outward, and one can accurately argue that it does so in all aspects of the production and organization of its operation. Bryce also made the point about the difference between Nollywood and the Francophone cinema of French West Africa that was the touch-bearer of what was known as the African cinema before the emergence of Nollywood. Indeed, as Bryce notes, Nollywood does not “have the opportunities for training and production financing” of Francophone cinema and does not “go to the biennial Pan-African Film Festival (FESPACO) in Burkina Faso.” Yet, it is remarkable in very radical ways. As a result of this success, Nollywood has been able to circumvent the problems that African Francophone filmmakers whine about and has done so successfully in the last twenty years or so. It has moved the discourse of cinematic representation away from the blame game that is obvious and somewhat compellingly\",\"PeriodicalId\":415369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postcolonial Text\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postcolonial Text\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501311680.ch-036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postcolonial Text","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501311680.ch-036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

诺莱坞,这个在拉各斯开幕的电影现象,在它的祖国尼日利亚取得了前所未有的成功。它开始在美国本土之外留下自己的印记。自2000年以来,它从一个国际电影节到另一个国际电影节,这些年来它的收获是一致的。2002年,本作者应邀参加了在巴巴多斯举行的第二届非洲和加勒比电影节。资深摄影师兼制片人图德·克拉尼(Tunde Kelani)也是诺莱坞的偶像之一,他也受邀展示了他的一部视频电影《霹雳》(Thunderbolt)。本届电影节的组织者之一简·布莱斯(Jane Bryce)对首次正式向岛国巴巴多斯的观众介绍诺莱坞感到非常兴奋。布莱斯向观众介绍奈莱坞时,改写了迄今为止视频电影学界的“常见话题”。它以一种批判和严肃的方式做到了这一点,不仅指出了这种媒介在非洲视觉文化中的独特性,而且指出了这种媒介在整个世界电影表达中的独特性。布莱斯将诺莱坞作为一门艺术和产业,展示了诺莱坞如何以及为什么会吸引其运营领域和文化视野之外的人的关注,而不是这个行业关心外界的任何关注。事实上,诺莱坞作为一种自主的本土电影表达方式的特征之一是它向内看而不是向外看,可以准确地说,它在生产和运营组织的各个方面都是这样做的。布莱斯还指出了诺莱坞与法属西非的法语电影之间的区别,后者是在诺莱坞出现之前被称为非洲电影的触点者。事实上,正如布莱斯指出的那样,诺莱坞没有“培训和资助法语电影的机会”,也没有“参加两年一次的布基纳法索泛非电影节(FESPACO)”。然而,它以非常激进的方式引人注目。这一成功的结果是,诺莱坞已经能够规避非洲法语电影制片人抱怨的问题,并在过去20年左右的时间里取得了如此成功。它使电影表现的话语远离了指责游戏,这是显而易见的,有点令人信服
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nollywood: Spectatorship, Audience and the Sites of Consumption
Nollywood on the Rise Nollywood, the cinematic phenomenon that was inaugurated in Lagos, has known an unprecedented measure of success in its homeland, Nigeria. It is beginning to make its mark outside this home turf. Since the year 2000, it has gone from one international Film Festival to the other, and the gain it has made in these years has been consistent. In 2002, this author was invited to the second edition of the Festival of African and Caribbean Film, which was held in Barbados. Tunde Kelani, the veteran camera man and producer, who is also one of the icons of Nollywood, was also invited to present one of his video films, Thunderbolt. Jane Bryce, one of the organizers of this Festival, was clearly excited to formally introduce Nollywood to the audience of the island nation of Barbados for the first time. Bryce’s introduction of Nollywood to this audience rephrased what is now “common talk” in the scholarship of the video film to date. It did so from a critical and serious manner, pointing not only to the uniqueness of this medium in the visual culture of Africa but also in the world cinematic expression as a whole. Bryce’s take on Nollywood as an art and industry shows how and why Nollywood compels attention from those outside its field of operation and cultural vision, not that the industry cares for any attention from the outside. In fact, one of the characteristics that marks Nollywood as an autonomous local cinematic expression is that it looks inward and not outward, and one can accurately argue that it does so in all aspects of the production and organization of its operation. Bryce also made the point about the difference between Nollywood and the Francophone cinema of French West Africa that was the touch-bearer of what was known as the African cinema before the emergence of Nollywood. Indeed, as Bryce notes, Nollywood does not “have the opportunities for training and production financing” of Francophone cinema and does not “go to the biennial Pan-African Film Festival (FESPACO) in Burkina Faso.” Yet, it is remarkable in very radical ways. As a result of this success, Nollywood has been able to circumvent the problems that African Francophone filmmakers whine about and has done so successfully in the last twenty years or so. It has moved the discourse of cinematic representation away from the blame game that is obvious and somewhat compellingly
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信