工程课程的可持续性整合:“独立”与“交织”之间的选择

K. S. Chiong, A. A. Abdul Raman, Fatimah Mohamad Zeeda
{"title":"工程课程的可持续性整合:“独立”与“交织”之间的选择","authors":"K. S. Chiong, A. A. Abdul Raman, Fatimah Mohamad Zeeda","doi":"10.51200/jbimpeagard.v1i1.3146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In view of the mounting evidence on the destruction of environmental quality and loss of cultural heritage as a result of technology development, various organizations have seen the dire need for sustainable development which can be acquired through education on sustainability. In institutions of higher education, engineering is one of the programmes that are active in seeking to integrate sustainability into its curricula. Several researchers have conducted researches on means of incorporating sustainability into engineering curricula and such means can generally be categorized into the horizontal or vertical approach. An integration approach is considered horizontal when the sustainability or environmental component is intertwined into the existing courses. On the other hand, integration through a specialized or stand-alone course on sustainability is considered as vertical approach. Both of these approaches are used and there is no consensus on which approach works the best. The existing literature has shown evidence on engagement of these two approaches by the American, European and Australian Institutions of Higher Education. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there has not been any similar study for the Malaysian IHE. Therefore, this research was conducted to identify the current sustainability integration approach for 3 traditional engineering disciplines, namely Civil, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering in 5 Malaysian IHE. An analysis of the engineering syllabi was conducted to identify if horizontal or vertical approach is used by the selected IHE for these 3 engineering disciplines. The result showed that horizontal approach was more commonly employed compared to vertical approach. This finding concocted with opinion of some of the researchers that sustainability education through horizontal approach may be more suitable for engineering programme which encourages interdisciplinary learning","PeriodicalId":304648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of BIMP-EAGA Regional Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUSTAINABILITY INTEGRATION INTO ENGINEERING CURRICULA: A CHOICE BETWEEN ‘STAND-ALONE’OR‘INTERTWINED’\",\"authors\":\"K. S. Chiong, A. A. Abdul Raman, Fatimah Mohamad Zeeda\",\"doi\":\"10.51200/jbimpeagard.v1i1.3146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In view of the mounting evidence on the destruction of environmental quality and loss of cultural heritage as a result of technology development, various organizations have seen the dire need for sustainable development which can be acquired through education on sustainability. In institutions of higher education, engineering is one of the programmes that are active in seeking to integrate sustainability into its curricula. Several researchers have conducted researches on means of incorporating sustainability into engineering curricula and such means can generally be categorized into the horizontal or vertical approach. An integration approach is considered horizontal when the sustainability or environmental component is intertwined into the existing courses. On the other hand, integration through a specialized or stand-alone course on sustainability is considered as vertical approach. Both of these approaches are used and there is no consensus on which approach works the best. The existing literature has shown evidence on engagement of these two approaches by the American, European and Australian Institutions of Higher Education. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there has not been any similar study for the Malaysian IHE. Therefore, this research was conducted to identify the current sustainability integration approach for 3 traditional engineering disciplines, namely Civil, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering in 5 Malaysian IHE. An analysis of the engineering syllabi was conducted to identify if horizontal or vertical approach is used by the selected IHE for these 3 engineering disciplines. The result showed that horizontal approach was more commonly employed compared to vertical approach. This finding concocted with opinion of some of the researchers that sustainability education through horizontal approach may be more suitable for engineering programme which encourages interdisciplinary learning\",\"PeriodicalId\":304648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of BIMP-EAGA Regional Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of BIMP-EAGA Regional Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51200/jbimpeagard.v1i1.3146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of BIMP-EAGA Regional Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51200/jbimpeagard.v1i1.3146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于越来越多的证据表明,由于技术发展,环境质量遭到破坏,文化遗产遭到损失,各种组织都看到了可持续发展的迫切需要,而可持续发展可以通过可持续教育来实现。在高等教育机构中,工程学是积极寻求将可持续性纳入其课程的专业之一。一些研究人员对将可持续性纳入工程课程的方法进行了研究,这些方法一般可分为水平方法或垂直方法。当可持续性或环境组成部分与现有课程交织在一起时,一体化方法被认为是横向的。另一方面,通过关于可持续性的专门或独立课程进行整合被认为是垂直方法。这两种方法都被使用,但对于哪种方法效果最好并没有共识。现有文献显示了美国、欧洲和澳大利亚高等教育机构采用这两种方法的证据。然而,据作者所知,还没有任何针对马来西亚IHE的类似研究。因此,本研究旨在确定马来西亚5所高等教育机构中土木、机械和电气工程这3个传统工程学科当前的可持续性整合方法。对工程教学大纲进行了分析,以确定选定的IHE在这3个工程学科中使用的是水平方法还是垂直方法。结果表明,水平入路比垂直入路更常用。这一发现与一些研究人员的观点相一致,即通过横向方法进行可持续教育可能更适合鼓励跨学科学习的工程项目
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SUSTAINABILITY INTEGRATION INTO ENGINEERING CURRICULA: A CHOICE BETWEEN ‘STAND-ALONE’OR‘INTERTWINED’
In view of the mounting evidence on the destruction of environmental quality and loss of cultural heritage as a result of technology development, various organizations have seen the dire need for sustainable development which can be acquired through education on sustainability. In institutions of higher education, engineering is one of the programmes that are active in seeking to integrate sustainability into its curricula. Several researchers have conducted researches on means of incorporating sustainability into engineering curricula and such means can generally be categorized into the horizontal or vertical approach. An integration approach is considered horizontal when the sustainability or environmental component is intertwined into the existing courses. On the other hand, integration through a specialized or stand-alone course on sustainability is considered as vertical approach. Both of these approaches are used and there is no consensus on which approach works the best. The existing literature has shown evidence on engagement of these two approaches by the American, European and Australian Institutions of Higher Education. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there has not been any similar study for the Malaysian IHE. Therefore, this research was conducted to identify the current sustainability integration approach for 3 traditional engineering disciplines, namely Civil, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering in 5 Malaysian IHE. An analysis of the engineering syllabi was conducted to identify if horizontal or vertical approach is used by the selected IHE for these 3 engineering disciplines. The result showed that horizontal approach was more commonly employed compared to vertical approach. This finding concocted with opinion of some of the researchers that sustainability education through horizontal approach may be more suitable for engineering programme which encourages interdisciplinary learning
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信