针对非英语使用者的不同系统的在线英语词汇学习

Mansour Alshumari, G. Bella
{"title":"针对非英语使用者的不同系统的在线英语词汇学习","authors":"Mansour Alshumari, G. Bella","doi":"10.1109/ELMAR.2014.6923374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces an empirical study to investigate and compare learning vocabulary using different interaction systems (static, adaptable and an adaptive) learning websites. The purpose of this study is to measure learning vocabulary achievements on non-English language speakers. The participants were Arabic speakers. The aim of the study is to compare the overall usability of these systems in terms of the number of tasks completed by all students and the number of students completing all of the tasks. These were tested independently by three separate groups, each consisting of 33 students (99 student's total). The results show that there was no difference in terms of usability between the three platforms at the overall level and at the individual level (as measured by the system usability scale (SUS)), but there was a difference in learning achievement; further, there was higher achievement in both the adaptive and adaptable systems compared to the static system.","PeriodicalId":424325,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings ELMAR-2014","volume":"81 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online English vocabulary learning on different systems for non-English speakers\",\"authors\":\"Mansour Alshumari, G. Bella\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ELMAR.2014.6923374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper introduces an empirical study to investigate and compare learning vocabulary using different interaction systems (static, adaptable and an adaptive) learning websites. The purpose of this study is to measure learning vocabulary achievements on non-English language speakers. The participants were Arabic speakers. The aim of the study is to compare the overall usability of these systems in terms of the number of tasks completed by all students and the number of students completing all of the tasks. These were tested independently by three separate groups, each consisting of 33 students (99 student's total). The results show that there was no difference in terms of usability between the three platforms at the overall level and at the individual level (as measured by the system usability scale (SUS)), but there was a difference in learning achievement; further, there was higher achievement in both the adaptive and adaptable systems compared to the static system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings ELMAR-2014\",\"volume\":\"81 11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings ELMAR-2014\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELMAR.2014.6923374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings ELMAR-2014","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELMAR.2014.6923374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了一项实证研究,调查和比较使用不同交互系统(静态、自适应和自适应)学习网站的词汇学习。本研究的目的是衡量非英语母语者的词汇学习成绩。与会者都是说阿拉伯语的。这项研究的目的是根据所有学生完成的任务数量和完成所有任务的学生数量来比较这些系统的总体可用性。这些测试由三个独立的小组独立进行,每个小组由33名学生组成(总共99名学生)。结果表明:三个平台在整体水平和个体水平上的可用性没有差异(以系统可用性量表(SUS)衡量),但在学习成就上存在差异;此外,与静态系统相比,自适应系统和自适应系统都取得了更高的成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online English vocabulary learning on different systems for non-English speakers
This paper introduces an empirical study to investigate and compare learning vocabulary using different interaction systems (static, adaptable and an adaptive) learning websites. The purpose of this study is to measure learning vocabulary achievements on non-English language speakers. The participants were Arabic speakers. The aim of the study is to compare the overall usability of these systems in terms of the number of tasks completed by all students and the number of students completing all of the tasks. These were tested independently by three separate groups, each consisting of 33 students (99 student's total). The results show that there was no difference in terms of usability between the three platforms at the overall level and at the individual level (as measured by the system usability scale (SUS)), but there was a difference in learning achievement; further, there was higher achievement in both the adaptive and adaptable systems compared to the static system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信