基于kld重采样的几何粒子滤波动态模型跟踪效率测量

A. A. Gunawan, W. Jatmiko, Vektor Dewanto, F. Rachmadi, F. Jovan
{"title":"基于kld重采样的几何粒子滤波动态模型跟踪效率测量","authors":"A. A. Gunawan, W. Jatmiko, Vektor Dewanto, F. Rachmadi, F. Jovan","doi":"10.1109/ICACSIS.2014.7065857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Particle filter has appeared as a useful tool for visual object tracking. The efficiency of the particle filter depends mostly on the number of particles used in the estimation. This paper would like to measure the efficiency of particle filter via the Kullback-Leibler distance (KLD). The basis of the method is similar to Fox's KLD-sampling but implemented differently using resampling. The benefit of this approach is that the underlying distribution is exactly the posterior distribution. By means of batch KLD-resampling, we measure the efficiency of several dynamic models by calculating the average number of needed samples. Using experiments, we found (i) the efficiency of particle filter can be measure reliably enough using batch KLD-resampling, (ii) dynamics models affect the efficiency of particle filter, but their performance depends mostly on the case by case situationally.","PeriodicalId":443250,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking efficiency measurement of dynamic models on geometric particle filter using KLD-resampling\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Gunawan, W. Jatmiko, Vektor Dewanto, F. Rachmadi, F. Jovan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICACSIS.2014.7065857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Particle filter has appeared as a useful tool for visual object tracking. The efficiency of the particle filter depends mostly on the number of particles used in the estimation. This paper would like to measure the efficiency of particle filter via the Kullback-Leibler distance (KLD). The basis of the method is similar to Fox's KLD-sampling but implemented differently using resampling. The benefit of this approach is that the underlying distribution is exactly the posterior distribution. By means of batch KLD-resampling, we measure the efficiency of several dynamic models by calculating the average number of needed samples. Using experiments, we found (i) the efficiency of particle filter can be measure reliably enough using batch KLD-resampling, (ii) dynamics models affect the efficiency of particle filter, but their performance depends mostly on the case by case situationally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS.2014.7065857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS.2014.7065857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

粒子滤波作为一种有用的视觉目标跟踪工具而出现。粒子滤波的效率主要取决于估计中使用的粒子的数量。本文通过Kullback-Leibler距离(KLD)来测量粒子滤波的效率。该方法的基础类似于Fox的kld采样,但使用重采样实现不同。这种方法的好处是底层分布完全是后验分布。通过批量kld重采样,我们通过计算所需样本的平均数量来衡量几种动态模型的效率。通过实验,我们发现(1)使用批量kld重采样可以足够可靠地测量粒子滤波器的效率;(2)动态模型影响粒子滤波器的效率,但其性能主要取决于具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracking efficiency measurement of dynamic models on geometric particle filter using KLD-resampling
Particle filter has appeared as a useful tool for visual object tracking. The efficiency of the particle filter depends mostly on the number of particles used in the estimation. This paper would like to measure the efficiency of particle filter via the Kullback-Leibler distance (KLD). The basis of the method is similar to Fox's KLD-sampling but implemented differently using resampling. The benefit of this approach is that the underlying distribution is exactly the posterior distribution. By means of batch KLD-resampling, we measure the efficiency of several dynamic models by calculating the average number of needed samples. Using experiments, we found (i) the efficiency of particle filter can be measure reliably enough using batch KLD-resampling, (ii) dynamics models affect the efficiency of particle filter, but their performance depends mostly on the case by case situationally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信