Adem Karaca, G. Kiliçoğlu, Sadettin Erbaş
{"title":"Eğitim Alanında Yapılan Kavram Yanılgılarına Yönelik Bilimsel Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi","authors":"Adem Karaca, G. Kiliçoğlu, Sadettin Erbaş","doi":"10.18039/ajesi.1292388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to perform a bibliometric analysis of articles on misconception in the education research category of the Web of Science (WoS) database. Bibliometric analyses are carried out to identify conceptual developments in a subject area, trends of researchers over time, themes researched, changes in the boundaries of disciplines, and the most productive academics, institutions, or countries and to present the “big picture”. This study used the descriptive survey model. In line with the purpose of the study, the keywords “misconception” and “misconceptions” were searched in “topic” in the WoS database using the “OR” option. As a result of the survey carried out on 12.01.2023, 3,545 articles were accessed. The obtained data were analyzed using the “bibliometrix” package in the RStudio programming language, included in the open-source R program. Journal of Chemical Education (f=310) was found to be the journal publishing the most articles on misconception in the WoS database, and the academics with the most studies were determined to be Bretz S. L., Treagust D. F., and Geban, O. The authors whose studies on misconception have the highest h-index values are Bretz S. L., Treagust D. F., and Sanger M. J. The first three countries producing the most articles on misconception are the USA, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, and the researchers who have the most international collaborations with researchers from different countries are also from the USA (83 articles). The most used keywords are “misconception/misconceptions”, “conceptual change”, and “science education”. This study is anticipated to present a comprehensive and detailed projection for academics who plan to conduct research in the subject area of misconception. In addition to different studies may be designed focusing on other dimensions of concept teaching.","PeriodicalId":134454,"journal":{"name":"Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1292388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是对Web of Science (WoS)数据库中有关教育研究类别误解的文章进行文献计量学分析。文献计量学分析用于确定学科领域的概念发展、研究人员的趋势、研究主题、学科边界的变化以及最具生产力的学者、机构或国家,并呈现“大局”。本研究采用描述性调查模型。根据研究目的,在WoS数据库的“topic”中使用“OR”选项搜索关键词“误区”和“误解”。该调查于2023年1月12日进行,共访问了3,545篇文章。获得的数据使用RStudio编程语言中的“bibliometrix”包进行分析,该包包含在开源R程序中。化学教育杂志》(f = 310)被发现杂志上发表文章最误解在我们数据库中,大多数研究的学者和决心是亲眼见识s L。Treagust d·f。Geban, o .作者的误解h指数最高价值观的研究毕捷s L。Treagust d·f。桑格m . j .第一个三个国家生产的大多数文章的误解是美国,土耳其,英国,与不同国家的研究人员进行国际合作最多的研究人员也来自美国(83篇)。使用最多的关键词是“误解/误解”、“观念改变”和“科学教育”。这项研究预计将为计划在误解主题领域进行研究的学者提供全面和详细的预测。此外,可以针对概念教学的其他维度设计不同的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eğitim Alanında Yapılan Kavram Yanılgılarına Yönelik Bilimsel Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi
The purpose of this study is to perform a bibliometric analysis of articles on misconception in the education research category of the Web of Science (WoS) database. Bibliometric analyses are carried out to identify conceptual developments in a subject area, trends of researchers over time, themes researched, changes in the boundaries of disciplines, and the most productive academics, institutions, or countries and to present the “big picture”. This study used the descriptive survey model. In line with the purpose of the study, the keywords “misconception” and “misconceptions” were searched in “topic” in the WoS database using the “OR” option. As a result of the survey carried out on 12.01.2023, 3,545 articles were accessed. The obtained data were analyzed using the “bibliometrix” package in the RStudio programming language, included in the open-source R program. Journal of Chemical Education (f=310) was found to be the journal publishing the most articles on misconception in the WoS database, and the academics with the most studies were determined to be Bretz S. L., Treagust D. F., and Geban, O. The authors whose studies on misconception have the highest h-index values are Bretz S. L., Treagust D. F., and Sanger M. J. The first three countries producing the most articles on misconception are the USA, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, and the researchers who have the most international collaborations with researchers from different countries are also from the USA (83 articles). The most used keywords are “misconception/misconceptions”, “conceptual change”, and “science education”. This study is anticipated to present a comprehensive and detailed projection for academics who plan to conduct research in the subject area of misconception. In addition to different studies may be designed focusing on other dimensions of concept teaching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信