语言学习策略在口语教学中的运用

Santri E. P. Djahimo, L. I. Rupidara, Josua Bire
{"title":"语言学习策略在口语教学中的运用","authors":"Santri E. P. Djahimo, L. I. Rupidara, Josua Bire","doi":"10.4108/eai.18-10-2019.2289997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at answering two questions about the types of learning strategies used by the majority of the third semester students of the English Department of Nusa Cendana University Kupang and whether or not the students’ backgrounds define their choice of language learning strategies. Rebecca Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire has been used to describe and explain phenomena related to learning strategies of the twenty-eight students involved in the research. The result reveals that 61% of all assessed students have used metacognitive strategy to other strategies. This implies that students from both groups cautiously monitored their ability and progress in learning English. In the meantime, the other result shows that positive output has been strongly seen in regards to students’ major. Metacognitive strategy has been used by 81.8% students from natural science, 22.2% students from social science and 57.1% students from language department.","PeriodicalId":243340,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering, Science, and Commerce, ICESC 2019, 18-19 October 2019, Labuan Bajo, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use Of Language Learning Strategies In Speaking Subject\",\"authors\":\"Santri E. P. Djahimo, L. I. Rupidara, Josua Bire\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.18-10-2019.2289997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims at answering two questions about the types of learning strategies used by the majority of the third semester students of the English Department of Nusa Cendana University Kupang and whether or not the students’ backgrounds define their choice of language learning strategies. Rebecca Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire has been used to describe and explain phenomena related to learning strategies of the twenty-eight students involved in the research. The result reveals that 61% of all assessed students have used metacognitive strategy to other strategies. This implies that students from both groups cautiously monitored their ability and progress in learning English. In the meantime, the other result shows that positive output has been strongly seen in regards to students’ major. Metacognitive strategy has been used by 81.8% students from natural science, 22.2% students from social science and 57.1% students from language department.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering, Science, and Commerce, ICESC 2019, 18-19 October 2019, Labuan Bajo, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering, Science, and Commerce, ICESC 2019, 18-19 October 2019, Labuan Bajo, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-10-2019.2289997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering, Science, and Commerce, ICESC 2019, 18-19 October 2019, Labuan Bajo, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-10-2019.2289997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是回答两个问题,即大多数第三学期的学生使用的学习策略的类型,以及学生的背景是否决定了他们的语言学习策略的选择。Rebecca Oxford的语言学习策略量表(strategic Inventory for Language Learning, SILL)被用来描述和解释参与研究的28名学生的学习策略相关现象。结果显示,61%的被评估学生将元认知策略用于其他策略。这意味着两组学生都在谨慎地监控他们学习英语的能力和进步。与此同时,另一个结果表明,在学生的专业方面,积极的产出已经被强烈地看到。使用元认知策略的自然科学系学生占81.8%,社会科学系学生占22.2%,语言系学生占57.1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use Of Language Learning Strategies In Speaking Subject
This study aims at answering two questions about the types of learning strategies used by the majority of the third semester students of the English Department of Nusa Cendana University Kupang and whether or not the students’ backgrounds define their choice of language learning strategies. Rebecca Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire has been used to describe and explain phenomena related to learning strategies of the twenty-eight students involved in the research. The result reveals that 61% of all assessed students have used metacognitive strategy to other strategies. This implies that students from both groups cautiously monitored their ability and progress in learning English. In the meantime, the other result shows that positive output has been strongly seen in regards to students’ major. Metacognitive strategy has been used by 81.8% students from natural science, 22.2% students from social science and 57.1% students from language department.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信