当事人权利保护与和解:概念与关联问题

E. Mikhaylova
{"title":"当事人权利保护与和解:概念与关联问题","authors":"E. Mikhaylova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-31-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the concept of legal protection, reveals its features. A distinction is made between protection of law and protection of law. Self-defense of civil rights is investigated. It is shown that self-defense is not an independent method of legal protection, since its result is not guaranteed by the state, and self-defense measures can be qualified as an offense. The concept and grounds for concluding an amicable agreement are revealed. It has been proved that amicable agreements can be concluded only in cases of a private law nature. Settlement agreements in public-law conflicts are allowed by the current procedural legislation, but they can be a means of committing corruption offenses. The author distinguishes between an amicable agreement as a procedural act and agreements on conciliation concluded out of court and having a civil law nature. Mediation is investigated as an out-of-court procedure for resolving civil conflicts. It was proposed to supplement the requirements for the candidacy of mediators with an indication of the obligatory presence of a higher legal education. It was also proposed to supplement the procedural legislation with sections on the procedure for challenging mediation agreements and on the issuance of writs of execution on them (by analogy with the decisions of arbitration courts), as well as an indication that the presence of a mediation agreement concluded by the parties is grounds for refusing to accept the statement of claim and for terminating proceedings on the case.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"127 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right Protection and Reconciliation of the Parties: The Issue of the Concepts and Correlation\",\"authors\":\"E. Mikhaylova\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-31-35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the concept of legal protection, reveals its features. A distinction is made between protection of law and protection of law. Self-defense of civil rights is investigated. It is shown that self-defense is not an independent method of legal protection, since its result is not guaranteed by the state, and self-defense measures can be qualified as an offense. The concept and grounds for concluding an amicable agreement are revealed. It has been proved that amicable agreements can be concluded only in cases of a private law nature. Settlement agreements in public-law conflicts are allowed by the current procedural legislation, but they can be a means of committing corruption offenses. The author distinguishes between an amicable agreement as a procedural act and agreements on conciliation concluded out of court and having a civil law nature. Mediation is investigated as an out-of-court procedure for resolving civil conflicts. It was proposed to supplement the requirements for the candidacy of mediators with an indication of the obligatory presence of a higher legal education. It was also proposed to supplement the procedural legislation with sections on the procedure for challenging mediation agreements and on the issuance of writs of execution on them (by analogy with the decisions of arbitration courts), as well as an indication that the presence of a mediation agreement concluded by the parties is grounds for refusing to accept the statement of claim and for terminating proceedings on the case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"127 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-31-35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-31-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章分析了法律保护的概念,揭示了法律保护的特点。法律保护和法律保护是有区别的。对公民权利的自卫进行了调查。本文认为,正当防卫不是一种独立的法律保护手段,其结果不受国家的保障,正当防卫措施可以构成犯罪。揭示了缔结友好协议的概念和依据。事实证明,只有在私法性质的情况下才能缔结友好协议。现行程序法允许公法冲突中的和解协议,但这可能成为实施腐败犯罪的一种手段。作者区分了作为程序性行为的友好协议和具有民法性质的庭外和解协议。调解是解决国内冲突的庭外程序。有人提议补充对调解员候选人资格的要求,说明必须接受高等法律教育。还有人提议补充程序性立法,规定对调解协议提出质疑的程序和对这些协议发出执行令状的条款(类似仲裁法院的决定),并指出当事各方缔结的调解协议是拒绝接受索赔声明和终止案件诉讼程序的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Right Protection and Reconciliation of the Parties: The Issue of the Concepts and Correlation
The article analyzes the concept of legal protection, reveals its features. A distinction is made between protection of law and protection of law. Self-defense of civil rights is investigated. It is shown that self-defense is not an independent method of legal protection, since its result is not guaranteed by the state, and self-defense measures can be qualified as an offense. The concept and grounds for concluding an amicable agreement are revealed. It has been proved that amicable agreements can be concluded only in cases of a private law nature. Settlement agreements in public-law conflicts are allowed by the current procedural legislation, but they can be a means of committing corruption offenses. The author distinguishes between an amicable agreement as a procedural act and agreements on conciliation concluded out of court and having a civil law nature. Mediation is investigated as an out-of-court procedure for resolving civil conflicts. It was proposed to supplement the requirements for the candidacy of mediators with an indication of the obligatory presence of a higher legal education. It was also proposed to supplement the procedural legislation with sections on the procedure for challenging mediation agreements and on the issuance of writs of execution on them (by analogy with the decisions of arbitration courts), as well as an indication that the presence of a mediation agreement concluded by the parties is grounds for refusing to accept the statement of claim and for terminating proceedings on the case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信