CO2激光与0.2%氯己定溶液对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的体外抑菌效果比较

A. Taghavi, Afsoon Asadollahi, H. Eslami, R. Attaran, M. Ranjkesh, H. Kafil
{"title":"CO2激光与0.2%氯己定溶液对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的体外抑菌效果比较","authors":"A. Taghavi, Afsoon Asadollahi, H. Eslami, R. Attaran, M. Ranjkesh, H. Kafil","doi":"10.1177/2229411220160106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The bacterium causes different diseases in the oral cavity including angular cheilitis, bacterial sialadenitis in salivary glands, joint septic arthritis. In addition, the accumulation of bacteria on the surface of the implant develops the inflammation of mucous. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CO2 laser with 2.0% chlorhexidine in a laboratory environment for eradicating Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Materials and Methods: The effect of CO2 Laser was evaluated 5, 10, and 15 s after exposure to the standard suspension of bacterium at 24 and 48 h intervals and were cultured until the logarithmic phase and CO2 laser radiation with the wavelengths of 6 and 10 μm and energy density of 12.5 J/cm2 were radiated at a distance of 17 mm. Chlorhexidine 0.2% also was assessed at 5, 10, 15, and 60 s on the pathogens. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation) and repeated measures ANOVA using SPSS 17. The P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: CO2 laser radiation was effective at all <15 s radiations on reducing both types of bacteria while the average numbers of S. aureus which were affected by 15 s of laser radiation and 60 s of chlorhexidine showed statistically significant difference (P = 0.014). The numbers of P. aeruginosa bacteria in the group which was exposed by laser for 15 s and the group which was treated by chlorhexidine were zero. Whereas, the average number of bacteria of laser treated group was lower than 0.2% chlorhexidine at both groups of bacteria. Laser radiation removed 100% of bacteria after 15 s in both groups of the bacteria. Conclusions: Findings of the present study indicate that laser irradiation for 15 s had equal results with chlorhexidine and more effective than 60 s treatment with chlorhexidine.","PeriodicalId":116198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Anti-bacterial Effect of CO2 Laser and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Solution on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Taghavi, Afsoon Asadollahi, H. Eslami, R. Attaran, M. Ranjkesh, H. Kafil\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2229411220160106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The bacterium causes different diseases in the oral cavity including angular cheilitis, bacterial sialadenitis in salivary glands, joint septic arthritis. In addition, the accumulation of bacteria on the surface of the implant develops the inflammation of mucous. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CO2 laser with 2.0% chlorhexidine in a laboratory environment for eradicating Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Materials and Methods: The effect of CO2 Laser was evaluated 5, 10, and 15 s after exposure to the standard suspension of bacterium at 24 and 48 h intervals and were cultured until the logarithmic phase and CO2 laser radiation with the wavelengths of 6 and 10 μm and energy density of 12.5 J/cm2 were radiated at a distance of 17 mm. Chlorhexidine 0.2% also was assessed at 5, 10, 15, and 60 s on the pathogens. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation) and repeated measures ANOVA using SPSS 17. The P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: CO2 laser radiation was effective at all <15 s radiations on reducing both types of bacteria while the average numbers of S. aureus which were affected by 15 s of laser radiation and 60 s of chlorhexidine showed statistically significant difference (P = 0.014). The numbers of P. aeruginosa bacteria in the group which was exposed by laser for 15 s and the group which was treated by chlorhexidine were zero. Whereas, the average number of bacteria of laser treated group was lower than 0.2% chlorhexidine at both groups of bacteria. Laser radiation removed 100% of bacteria after 15 s in both groups of the bacteria. Conclusions: Findings of the present study indicate that laser irradiation for 15 s had equal results with chlorhexidine and more effective than 60 s treatment with chlorhexidine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2229411220160106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2229411220160106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:该细菌可引起不同的口腔疾病,包括角性口唇炎、唾液腺细菌性涎腺炎、关节脓毒性关节炎。此外,细菌在种植体表面的积累会引起粘膜炎症。本研究的目的是比较CO2激光与2.0%氯己定在实验室环境下对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的根除效果。材料与方法:分别于标准菌悬液暴露后5、10和15 s,间隔24和48 h进行CO2激光效果评价,培养至对数相,在距离17 mm处辐射波长为6和10 μm,能量密度为12.5 J/cm2的CO2激光。0.2%氯己定也在5、10、15和60 s时对病原体进行了评估。数据分析采用描述性统计(均数±标准差),采用SPSS 17进行重复测量方差分析。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:CO2激光照射在<15 s照射下对两种细菌均有效,且15 s激光照射与60 s氯己定照射对金黄色葡萄球菌的平均影响数差异有统计学意义(P = 0.014)。激光照射15 s组和氯己定处理组铜绿假单胞菌数量均为零。两组细菌中激光处理组的平均细菌数均低于0.2%氯己定。激光照射15 s后,两组细菌的去除率均为100%。结论:本研究结果表明,激光照射15s与氯己定治疗效果相当,且优于60 s的氯己定治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Anti-bacterial Effect of CO2 Laser and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Solution on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: In Vitro Study
Objectives: The bacterium causes different diseases in the oral cavity including angular cheilitis, bacterial sialadenitis in salivary glands, joint septic arthritis. In addition, the accumulation of bacteria on the surface of the implant develops the inflammation of mucous. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CO2 laser with 2.0% chlorhexidine in a laboratory environment for eradicating Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Materials and Methods: The effect of CO2 Laser was evaluated 5, 10, and 15 s after exposure to the standard suspension of bacterium at 24 and 48 h intervals and were cultured until the logarithmic phase and CO2 laser radiation with the wavelengths of 6 and 10 μm and energy density of 12.5 J/cm2 were radiated at a distance of 17 mm. Chlorhexidine 0.2% also was assessed at 5, 10, 15, and 60 s on the pathogens. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation) and repeated measures ANOVA using SPSS 17. The P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: CO2 laser radiation was effective at all <15 s radiations on reducing both types of bacteria while the average numbers of S. aureus which were affected by 15 s of laser radiation and 60 s of chlorhexidine showed statistically significant difference (P = 0.014). The numbers of P. aeruginosa bacteria in the group which was exposed by laser for 15 s and the group which was treated by chlorhexidine were zero. Whereas, the average number of bacteria of laser treated group was lower than 0.2% chlorhexidine at both groups of bacteria. Laser radiation removed 100% of bacteria after 15 s in both groups of the bacteria. Conclusions: Findings of the present study indicate that laser irradiation for 15 s had equal results with chlorhexidine and more effective than 60 s treatment with chlorhexidine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信