“旧”进化经济学视野下的组织惯例:将政治学重新引入组织学习研究

Edward N. Lorenz
{"title":"“旧”进化经济学视野下的组织惯例:将政治学重新引入组织学习研究","authors":"Edward N. Lorenz","doi":"10.1051/EJESS:2000117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in organisational behaviour has largely focused on the cognitive features of organisational routines and learning to the neglect of their political determinants. This paper draws inspiration from J.R. Commons' theory of institutional change to develop a more integrated account giving due weight to the political dimension. The first section of the text develops the key analytical distinc- tion Commons makes between habit and custom. Habit, much as the notion of rou- tine, refers to repeated behaviour and to the individual learning processes that account for its emergence. Custom refers to the collective sanctions and pressures which channel such individual learning processes in socially acceptable directions. The paper shows how this distinction allows Commons to analyse the way repeated behaviour at the individual level is embedded in a wider group or social context. The second section of the text turns to Common's theory of dispute resolution. It is argued that his analysis contains the elements of a theory of organisational change, or of the processes which change routines, that involves a constant interplay between centralised intervention and the unplanned local emergence of practices and behaviours.","PeriodicalId":352454,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organisational Routines In the Light of 'Old' Evolutionary Economics : Bringing Politics Back into the Study of Organisational Learning\",\"authors\":\"Edward N. Lorenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/EJESS:2000117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research in organisational behaviour has largely focused on the cognitive features of organisational routines and learning to the neglect of their political determinants. This paper draws inspiration from J.R. Commons' theory of institutional change to develop a more integrated account giving due weight to the political dimension. The first section of the text develops the key analytical distinc- tion Commons makes between habit and custom. Habit, much as the notion of rou- tine, refers to repeated behaviour and to the individual learning processes that account for its emergence. Custom refers to the collective sanctions and pressures which channel such individual learning processes in socially acceptable directions. The paper shows how this distinction allows Commons to analyse the way repeated behaviour at the individual level is embedded in a wider group or social context. The second section of the text turns to Common's theory of dispute resolution. It is argued that his analysis contains the elements of a theory of organisational change, or of the processes which change routines, that involves a constant interplay between centralised intervention and the unplanned local emergence of practices and behaviours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/EJESS:2000117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/EJESS:2000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

组织行为学的研究主要集中在组织惯例和学习的认知特征上,而忽视了它们的政治决定因素。本文从J.R. Commons的制度变迁理论中获得启发,对政治维度进行了更全面的解释。本文的第一部分展开了Commons对习惯和风俗的关键分析区分。习惯,就像日常时间的概念一样,指的是重复的行为和导致其出现的个人学习过程。习惯是指将这种个人学习过程引导到社会可接受的方向上的集体制裁和压力。这篇论文展示了这种区别如何让Commons分析个人层面的重复行为如何嵌入到更广泛的群体或社会背景中。文章的第二部分转向Common的争议解决理论。有人认为,他的分析包含了组织变革理论的要素,或者是改变常规的过程的要素,这涉及到集中干预与无计划的局部实践和行为之间的持续相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organisational Routines In the Light of 'Old' Evolutionary Economics : Bringing Politics Back into the Study of Organisational Learning
Research in organisational behaviour has largely focused on the cognitive features of organisational routines and learning to the neglect of their political determinants. This paper draws inspiration from J.R. Commons' theory of institutional change to develop a more integrated account giving due weight to the political dimension. The first section of the text develops the key analytical distinc- tion Commons makes between habit and custom. Habit, much as the notion of rou- tine, refers to repeated behaviour and to the individual learning processes that account for its emergence. Custom refers to the collective sanctions and pressures which channel such individual learning processes in socially acceptable directions. The paper shows how this distinction allows Commons to analyse the way repeated behaviour at the individual level is embedded in a wider group or social context. The second section of the text turns to Common's theory of dispute resolution. It is argued that his analysis contains the elements of a theory of organisational change, or of the processes which change routines, that involves a constant interplay between centralised intervention and the unplanned local emergence of practices and behaviours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信