{"title":"用复杂的词汇类型对生成词典中集合名词的多义现象进行建模","authors":"Patrick Caudal","doi":"10.1109/DEXA.1998.707396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a formal treatment of collective nouns (e.g. police, orchestra, and forest) drawing on the rich lexical typing of the Generative Lexicon. Collectives can be alternatively interpreted as collections in the sense of Link (1983), or as individuals, depending on contextual factors. They are therefore polysemous. Their semantics includes a meronymic (part/whole) relation which may or may not be accessible, depending on which interpretation they receive. The polysemy of collectives will be modelled using dot objects nominal types (dot objects being the Cartesian product of simple lexical types within a hierarchical lexicon) and qualia roles, capturing the constraints observed on their meronymic structure and complex lexical typing.","PeriodicalId":194923,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Ninth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (Cat. No.98EX130)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using complex lexical types to model the polysemy of collective nouns within the Generative Lexicon\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Caudal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DEXA.1998.707396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a formal treatment of collective nouns (e.g. police, orchestra, and forest) drawing on the rich lexical typing of the Generative Lexicon. Collectives can be alternatively interpreted as collections in the sense of Link (1983), or as individuals, depending on contextual factors. They are therefore polysemous. Their semantics includes a meronymic (part/whole) relation which may or may not be accessible, depending on which interpretation they receive. The polysemy of collectives will be modelled using dot objects nominal types (dot objects being the Cartesian product of simple lexical types within a hierarchical lexicon) and qualia roles, capturing the constraints observed on their meronymic structure and complex lexical typing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Ninth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (Cat. No.98EX130)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Ninth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (Cat. No.98EX130)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.1998.707396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Ninth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (Cat. No.98EX130)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.1998.707396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
本文利用生成词典丰富的词汇类型,提出了对集体名词(如police, orchestra, and forest)的形式化处理。集体可以被解释为林克(Link, 1983)意义上的集合,也可以被解释为个体,这取决于语境因素。因此它们是多义的。它们的语义包括一种异名(部分/整体)关系,这种关系可能是可访问的,也可能不是可访问的,这取决于它们接受的解释。将使用点对象、名义类型(点对象是层次词典中简单词汇类型的笛卡尔积)和质角色对集合的多义进行建模,捕获在它们的同义结构和复杂词汇类型上观察到的约束。
Using complex lexical types to model the polysemy of collective nouns within the Generative Lexicon
This paper proposes a formal treatment of collective nouns (e.g. police, orchestra, and forest) drawing on the rich lexical typing of the Generative Lexicon. Collectives can be alternatively interpreted as collections in the sense of Link (1983), or as individuals, depending on contextual factors. They are therefore polysemous. Their semantics includes a meronymic (part/whole) relation which may or may not be accessible, depending on which interpretation they receive. The polysemy of collectives will be modelled using dot objects nominal types (dot objects being the Cartesian product of simple lexical types within a hierarchical lexicon) and qualia roles, capturing the constraints observed on their meronymic structure and complex lexical typing.