EN ISO 9001:2015卫生保健部门质量管理体系符合PN-EN 15224:2017-02标准和卫生部长认证标准-比较分析

Ewa Kaniecka, D. Timler, Agata Białas, Małgorzata Timler, Monika Białas, A. Staszewska, Edyta Skibińska, Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska
{"title":"EN ISO 9001:2015卫生保健部门质量管理体系符合PN-EN 15224:2017-02标准和卫生部长认证标准-比较分析","authors":"Ewa Kaniecka, D. Timler, Agata Białas, Małgorzata Timler, Monika Białas, A. Staszewska, Edyta Skibińska, Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska","doi":"10.36145/jhsm2021.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim The aim of this article is to indicate similarities and differences between EN ISO 9001:2015 quality management system in accordance with PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and the accreditation standards of the Minister of Health. Material and methods A comparative analysis of two documents describing requirements of the quality management system EN ISO 9001:2015 in accordance with PN-EN 15224:2017-02 and accreditation standards of the Minister of Health issued by the Quality Monitoring Centre was performed. Results This comparative analysis concerns individual aspects/quality requirements of the PN-EN 15224-02 standard with reference to thematically analogous accreditation standards. According to the following analysis designation of both the PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and accreditation for health care sector causes natural, very high convergence and similarity between both systems. For specialist and expert on discussed subject, there is no bigger problem with connecting mutual reference of requirements of individual quality aspects described in the standard and accreditation standards. The PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard, similarly to accreditation standards, pays particular attention to obligation to manage clinical risk during planning, implementation and control of individual process which becomes the key element of quality management system for clinical activities. In both cases, data related to significant events connected with hospitalization should be analyzed and assessed, and conclusions and observations should be used to conduct improvement projects in important health care areas in accordance with the E. Deming quality improvement methodology (PDCA cycle). However, they can’t be said to be identical. Differences result from the very structure of the documents. Accreditation standards are divided into 15 subject areas, gathering a total of 221 standards. The PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard, in accordance with the ISO/ IEC Directives, Part 1, Consolidated ISO Supplement, Annex SL, contains common, consistent structure of new revised management system standards. Another difference between discussed systems concerns scope of both documents, the standard has international dimension and the set of standards is definitely national. There are, of course, many more similarities as well as differences, which this article deals with in full. Conclusions Carried out analysis shows clearly that, despite formal differences, there are numerous connections and analogies between requirements of individual quality aspects of the PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and requirements of the accreditation standards. Effective implementation of both requirements of the ISO standard in question and accreditation standards can constitute the basis for creating a single, consistent and effective management system for treatment entity as a whole.","PeriodicalId":335287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Study and Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EN ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System for Health Care Sector in Accordance with PN-EN 15224:2017-02 Standard and Accreditation Standards of the Minister of Health – Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Kaniecka, D. Timler, Agata Białas, Małgorzata Timler, Monika Białas, A. Staszewska, Edyta Skibińska, Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska\",\"doi\":\"10.36145/jhsm2021.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim The aim of this article is to indicate similarities and differences between EN ISO 9001:2015 quality management system in accordance with PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and the accreditation standards of the Minister of Health. Material and methods A comparative analysis of two documents describing requirements of the quality management system EN ISO 9001:2015 in accordance with PN-EN 15224:2017-02 and accreditation standards of the Minister of Health issued by the Quality Monitoring Centre was performed. Results This comparative analysis concerns individual aspects/quality requirements of the PN-EN 15224-02 standard with reference to thematically analogous accreditation standards. According to the following analysis designation of both the PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and accreditation for health care sector causes natural, very high convergence and similarity between both systems. For specialist and expert on discussed subject, there is no bigger problem with connecting mutual reference of requirements of individual quality aspects described in the standard and accreditation standards. The PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard, similarly to accreditation standards, pays particular attention to obligation to manage clinical risk during planning, implementation and control of individual process which becomes the key element of quality management system for clinical activities. In both cases, data related to significant events connected with hospitalization should be analyzed and assessed, and conclusions and observations should be used to conduct improvement projects in important health care areas in accordance with the E. Deming quality improvement methodology (PDCA cycle). However, they can’t be said to be identical. Differences result from the very structure of the documents. Accreditation standards are divided into 15 subject areas, gathering a total of 221 standards. The PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard, in accordance with the ISO/ IEC Directives, Part 1, Consolidated ISO Supplement, Annex SL, contains common, consistent structure of new revised management system standards. Another difference between discussed systems concerns scope of both documents, the standard has international dimension and the set of standards is definitely national. There are, of course, many more similarities as well as differences, which this article deals with in full. Conclusions Carried out analysis shows clearly that, despite formal differences, there are numerous connections and analogies between requirements of individual quality aspects of the PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and requirements of the accreditation standards. Effective implementation of both requirements of the ISO standard in question and accreditation standards can constitute the basis for creating a single, consistent and effective management system for treatment entity as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Study and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Study and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36145/jhsm2021.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Study and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36145/jhsm2021.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本文的目的是指出符合PN-EN 15224:2017-02标准的EN ISO 9001:2015质量管理体系与卫生部认可标准的异同。根据PN-EN 15224:2017-02和质量监测中心发布的卫生部认证标准,对描述质量管理体系EN ISO 9001:2015要求的两份文件进行了对比分析。对比分析了PN-EN 15224-02标准的各个方面/质量要求,并参考了主题类似的认可标准。根据以下分析,PN-EN 15224:2017-02标准的指定和医疗保健部门的认可导致两个系统之间自然的,非常高的趋同和相似性。对于所讨论主题的专家和专家来说,将标准和认可标准中描述的各个质量方面的要求相互参考联系起来并不是更大的问题。与认可标准类似,PN-EN 15224:2017-02标准特别关注在计划,实施和控制单个过程期间管理临床风险的义务,这成为临床活动质量管理体系的关键要素。在这两种情况下,应分析和评估与住院有关的重大事件的数据,并根据E. Deming质量改进方法(PDCA循环)利用结论和观察结果在重要的保健领域开展改进项目。然而,它们不能说是完全相同的。这些差异是由文档的结构本身造成的。认证标准分为15个学科领域,共收集221项标准。PN-EN 15224:2017-02标准,根据ISO/ IEC指令,第1部分,综合ISO补充,附录SL,包含新修订的管理体系标准的共同,一致的结构。所讨论的体系之间的另一个区别涉及两个文件的范围,标准具有国际维度,而标准集肯定是国家的。当然,两者之间有更多的相似之处,也有更多的不同之处,本文将对此进行全面讨论。分析清楚地表明,尽管形式上存在差异,但PN-EN 15224:2017-02标准的各个质量方面的要求与认可标准的要求之间存在许多联系和相似之处。有效实施相关ISO标准和认可标准的要求,可以为整个处理实体建立单一、一致和有效的管理体系奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EN ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System for Health Care Sector in Accordance with PN-EN 15224:2017-02 Standard and Accreditation Standards of the Minister of Health – Comparative Analysis
Abstract The aim The aim of this article is to indicate similarities and differences between EN ISO 9001:2015 quality management system in accordance with PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and the accreditation standards of the Minister of Health. Material and methods A comparative analysis of two documents describing requirements of the quality management system EN ISO 9001:2015 in accordance with PN-EN 15224:2017-02 and accreditation standards of the Minister of Health issued by the Quality Monitoring Centre was performed. Results This comparative analysis concerns individual aspects/quality requirements of the PN-EN 15224-02 standard with reference to thematically analogous accreditation standards. According to the following analysis designation of both the PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and accreditation for health care sector causes natural, very high convergence and similarity between both systems. For specialist and expert on discussed subject, there is no bigger problem with connecting mutual reference of requirements of individual quality aspects described in the standard and accreditation standards. The PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard, similarly to accreditation standards, pays particular attention to obligation to manage clinical risk during planning, implementation and control of individual process which becomes the key element of quality management system for clinical activities. In both cases, data related to significant events connected with hospitalization should be analyzed and assessed, and conclusions and observations should be used to conduct improvement projects in important health care areas in accordance with the E. Deming quality improvement methodology (PDCA cycle). However, they can’t be said to be identical. Differences result from the very structure of the documents. Accreditation standards are divided into 15 subject areas, gathering a total of 221 standards. The PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard, in accordance with the ISO/ IEC Directives, Part 1, Consolidated ISO Supplement, Annex SL, contains common, consistent structure of new revised management system standards. Another difference between discussed systems concerns scope of both documents, the standard has international dimension and the set of standards is definitely national. There are, of course, many more similarities as well as differences, which this article deals with in full. Conclusions Carried out analysis shows clearly that, despite formal differences, there are numerous connections and analogies between requirements of individual quality aspects of the PN-EN 15224:2017-02 standard and requirements of the accreditation standards. Effective implementation of both requirements of the ISO standard in question and accreditation standards can constitute the basis for creating a single, consistent and effective management system for treatment entity as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信