埃桑兰,埃多州,尼日利亚:部落和部落起源的民族志研究

Williams Ehizuwa Orukpe
{"title":"埃桑兰,埃多州,尼日利亚:部落和部落起源的民族志研究","authors":"Williams Ehizuwa Orukpe","doi":"10.31901/24566799.2021-22/20.1-2.426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study re-examines the origin of the Esan tribe and tribal. It was informed by the observed problem of submersion preponderant in Edoid ethnographic studies. The mono-causal Benin hypothesis of Esan origin propagated in leading ethnographies on the Edo speaking peoples is ahistorical. It traced Esan tribal origin to the 15th century. Using the historical research methodology and the case study research design, this study debunked the “Esan fua” and other Benincentric traditions of Esan origin as distortions. The study explored linguistic and archaeological evidence to demonstrate that Esan autochthonous origin predates 1400 C.E. Linguistic study shows that the Esan language was arguably separated from the Kwa language group of the Western Sudanic language before Bini. The archaeological study of Esan moats proved that they were constructed by Esan people long before the 15th century. It concludes that tribal protectionism is critical to preserving mini tribes in Nigeria, and curbing ethnographical distortions.","PeriodicalId":398563,"journal":{"name":"Studies of Tribes and Tribals","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esanland, Edo State, Nigeria: An Ethnographic Study of the Origin of the Tribe and Tribal\",\"authors\":\"Williams Ehizuwa Orukpe\",\"doi\":\"10.31901/24566799.2021-22/20.1-2.426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study re-examines the origin of the Esan tribe and tribal. It was informed by the observed problem of submersion preponderant in Edoid ethnographic studies. The mono-causal Benin hypothesis of Esan origin propagated in leading ethnographies on the Edo speaking peoples is ahistorical. It traced Esan tribal origin to the 15th century. Using the historical research methodology and the case study research design, this study debunked the “Esan fua” and other Benincentric traditions of Esan origin as distortions. The study explored linguistic and archaeological evidence to demonstrate that Esan autochthonous origin predates 1400 C.E. Linguistic study shows that the Esan language was arguably separated from the Kwa language group of the Western Sudanic language before Bini. The archaeological study of Esan moats proved that they were constructed by Esan people long before the 15th century. It concludes that tribal protectionism is critical to preserving mini tribes in Nigeria, and curbing ethnographical distortions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies of Tribes and Tribals\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies of Tribes and Tribals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31901/24566799.2021-22/20.1-2.426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies of Tribes and Tribals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31901/24566799.2021-22/20.1-2.426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究重新考察了伊桑部落和部落的起源。它是由在伊多伊德民族志研究中观察到的淹没优势问题提供的。在主要的民族志中传播的关于江户人的单一因果贝宁假说是不历史的。它将伊桑部落的起源追溯到15世纪。本研究运用历史研究方法和个案研究设计,揭穿“伊桑富亚”及其他源自伊桑的贝南中心主义传统的扭曲。该研究探索了语言学和考古学证据,以证明埃桑语的本土起源早于公元1400年。语言学研究表明,埃桑语可以说是在比尼语之前从西苏丹语的夸语族中分离出来的。对伊桑护城河的考古研究证明,它们是由伊桑人早在15世纪之前建造的。报告的结论是,部落保护主义对于保护尼日利亚的小部落和遏制人种学扭曲至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Esanland, Edo State, Nigeria: An Ethnographic Study of the Origin of the Tribe and Tribal
This study re-examines the origin of the Esan tribe and tribal. It was informed by the observed problem of submersion preponderant in Edoid ethnographic studies. The mono-causal Benin hypothesis of Esan origin propagated in leading ethnographies on the Edo speaking peoples is ahistorical. It traced Esan tribal origin to the 15th century. Using the historical research methodology and the case study research design, this study debunked the “Esan fua” and other Benincentric traditions of Esan origin as distortions. The study explored linguistic and archaeological evidence to demonstrate that Esan autochthonous origin predates 1400 C.E. Linguistic study shows that the Esan language was arguably separated from the Kwa language group of the Western Sudanic language before Bini. The archaeological study of Esan moats proved that they were constructed by Esan people long before the 15th century. It concludes that tribal protectionism is critical to preserving mini tribes in Nigeria, and curbing ethnographical distortions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信