跨学科生物医学、政策和教育卫生科学团队动机的异同:使用matrix的混合方法比较案例研究

Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Emily J Balog, Shelley B Brundage, Patricia Deyo, Leocadia Conlon, Kevin Bugin, Landria Sheffey, E. Cook, Melissa Gentry
{"title":"跨学科生物医学、政策和教育卫生科学团队动机的异同:使用matrix的混合方法比较案例研究","authors":"Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Emily J Balog, Shelley B Brundage, Patricia Deyo, Leocadia Conlon, Kevin Bugin, Landria Sheffey, E. Cook, Melissa Gentry","doi":"10.1108/tpm-05-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate individual motivations for participating in collaborative health knowledge producing teams (KPTs), as well as satisfaction gained by participation in science teams. The authors focus on understanding motivators across team types, levels of engagement and alignment within and across teams and need satisfaction in a total of six science teams. Areas of strong congruence and divergence of motivating factors can be aligned across (i) learning and professional growth satisfaction, (ii) respect, collegiality and enjoyment satisfaction and (iii) accomplishment and discovery satisfaction. Levels of satisfaction are hierarchically mapped showing their relation to more external and communal foci to motivations that seek satisfaction of individual needs.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis mixed method comparative study uses data from the motivation assessment for team readiness integration and collaboration (MATRICx) tool and themes generated from semi-structured interviews. This methodology provided a means to compare a hierarchy of motivations against levels of collaborative engagement, as well as individual needs satisfaction and ultimately the identification of higher and lower-level motivations related to self and external foci.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicate that there are both similarities and differences in motivations in different health science teams when one compares biomedical, education and policy teams. A comparison of MATRICx data from across team types and teams suggests areas of strong congruence as well as areas of divergence in motivation factors.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper and its findings use a novel tool along with qualitative research techniques to identify motivation in KPTs and uses these data to understand what type of needs satisfaction are important across three areas of health science teaming. Our research informs team leaders, facilitators and consultants about the important motivations team members have entering teams and has the potential to provide a blueprint to ensure peak performance as individual team members seek to address their ever-growing professional needs.\n","PeriodicalId":150524,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similarities and differences in motivation in cross-disciplinary biomedical, policy, and education health science teams: a mixed methods comparative case study using the MATRICx\",\"authors\":\"Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Emily J Balog, Shelley B Brundage, Patricia Deyo, Leocadia Conlon, Kevin Bugin, Landria Sheffey, E. Cook, Melissa Gentry\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tpm-05-2022-0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to investigate individual motivations for participating in collaborative health knowledge producing teams (KPTs), as well as satisfaction gained by participation in science teams. The authors focus on understanding motivators across team types, levels of engagement and alignment within and across teams and need satisfaction in a total of six science teams. Areas of strong congruence and divergence of motivating factors can be aligned across (i) learning and professional growth satisfaction, (ii) respect, collegiality and enjoyment satisfaction and (iii) accomplishment and discovery satisfaction. Levels of satisfaction are hierarchically mapped showing their relation to more external and communal foci to motivations that seek satisfaction of individual needs.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis mixed method comparative study uses data from the motivation assessment for team readiness integration and collaboration (MATRICx) tool and themes generated from semi-structured interviews. This methodology provided a means to compare a hierarchy of motivations against levels of collaborative engagement, as well as individual needs satisfaction and ultimately the identification of higher and lower-level motivations related to self and external foci.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings indicate that there are both similarities and differences in motivations in different health science teams when one compares biomedical, education and policy teams. A comparison of MATRICx data from across team types and teams suggests areas of strong congruence as well as areas of divergence in motivation factors.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe paper and its findings use a novel tool along with qualitative research techniques to identify motivation in KPTs and uses these data to understand what type of needs satisfaction are important across three areas of health science teaming. Our research informs team leaders, facilitators and consultants about the important motivations team members have entering teams and has the potential to provide a blueprint to ensure peak performance as individual team members seek to address their ever-growing professional needs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":150524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Team Performance Management: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Team Performance Management: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-05-2022-0036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-05-2022-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨个人参与协同卫生知识生产团队的动机,以及参与科学团队所获得的满意度。作者专注于理解跨团队类型的激励因素,团队内部和团队之间的参与水平和一致性,以及总共六个科学团队的需求满意度。激励因素的强一致性和差异性领域可以在以下方面进行对齐:(i)学习和专业成长满意度,(ii)尊重,合作和享受满意度以及(iii)成就和发现满意度。满意度水平按层次绘制,显示了它们与更多外部和公共焦点的关系,以及寻求满足个人需求的动机。设计/方法/方法这个混合方法比较研究使用了来自团队准备整合和协作的动机评估(matrix)工具的数据和来自半结构化访谈的主题。这种方法提供了一种方法来比较动机层次与协作参与水平的关系,以及个人需求满意度,并最终确定与自我和外部焦点相关的较高和较低层次动机。研究结果表明,当比较生物医学、教育和政策团队时,不同健康科学团队的动机既有相似之处,也有差异。对来自不同团队类型和团队的matrix数据的比较表明,在激励因素方面,有很强一致性的领域,也有分歧的领域。原创性/价值本文及其研究结果使用了一种新颖的工具以及定性研究技术来确定kpt的动机,并使用这些数据来了解哪种类型的需求满足在健康科学团队的三个领域中是重要的。我们的研究让团队领导者、辅导员和顾问了解团队成员进入团队的重要动机,并有可能提供一个蓝图,以确保团队成员在寻求满足他们不断增长的专业需求时达到最佳表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Similarities and differences in motivation in cross-disciplinary biomedical, policy, and education health science teams: a mixed methods comparative case study using the MATRICx
Purpose This study aims to investigate individual motivations for participating in collaborative health knowledge producing teams (KPTs), as well as satisfaction gained by participation in science teams. The authors focus on understanding motivators across team types, levels of engagement and alignment within and across teams and need satisfaction in a total of six science teams. Areas of strong congruence and divergence of motivating factors can be aligned across (i) learning and professional growth satisfaction, (ii) respect, collegiality and enjoyment satisfaction and (iii) accomplishment and discovery satisfaction. Levels of satisfaction are hierarchically mapped showing their relation to more external and communal foci to motivations that seek satisfaction of individual needs. Design/methodology/approach This mixed method comparative study uses data from the motivation assessment for team readiness integration and collaboration (MATRICx) tool and themes generated from semi-structured interviews. This methodology provided a means to compare a hierarchy of motivations against levels of collaborative engagement, as well as individual needs satisfaction and ultimately the identification of higher and lower-level motivations related to self and external foci. Findings The findings indicate that there are both similarities and differences in motivations in different health science teams when one compares biomedical, education and policy teams. A comparison of MATRICx data from across team types and teams suggests areas of strong congruence as well as areas of divergence in motivation factors. Originality/value The paper and its findings use a novel tool along with qualitative research techniques to identify motivation in KPTs and uses these data to understand what type of needs satisfaction are important across three areas of health science teaming. Our research informs team leaders, facilitators and consultants about the important motivations team members have entering teams and has the potential to provide a blueprint to ensure peak performance as individual team members seek to address their ever-growing professional needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信