干净的房间和发痒的脸。

R Guest
{"title":"干净的房间和发痒的脸。","authors":"R Guest","doi":"10.1093/occmed/41.1.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Seventy-one male employees whose working environment was a temperature and dust controlled low-humidity 'Clean Room' and 144 male employees working in a natural factory environment were compared by means of period percentage prevalences of occurrence, severity and frequency of subjective symptoms of facial dermatitis. Using a cross-sectional interviewer-administered questionnaire it was possible to assess the percentage prevalence of each of 3 facial dermatitis symptoms among both low humidity exposed and non-exposed workers. The two prevalences were compared by calculating a ratio (the percentage prevalence ratio or PPR) of the prevalence of symptoms in the exposed, to that in the non-exposed workforce. A confidence interval (CI) for the PPR was also calculated. For the symptom of itching, the PPR was 1.65 (CI 1.32-2.07) in favour of the study group, whilst for the symptoms of redness and urticaria the PPRs were 1.96 (CI 1.54-2.48) and 2.53 (CI 1.40-4.59) respectively. The occurrence of a greater prevalence of all symptoms in the low-humidity exposed workforce confirms the clinical and laboratory reports of previous workers. A comparison was also made between the two groups of workers of both the severity, and the frequency of occurrence of symptoms. Whilst there was no statistically significant difference between the exposed and non-exposed groups for prevalence of one symptom, among those who had experienced two symptoms there was a PPR of 2.43 (CI 1.37-4.30) between the two groups. Furthermore, among those workers who had experienced all 3 symptoms of facial dermatitis there was a PPR of 3.38 (CI 1.18-8.93) in favour of the low-humidity exposed workforce.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76684,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":"37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/41.1.37","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clean rooms and itchy faces.\",\"authors\":\"R Guest\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/41.1.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Seventy-one male employees whose working environment was a temperature and dust controlled low-humidity 'Clean Room' and 144 male employees working in a natural factory environment were compared by means of period percentage prevalences of occurrence, severity and frequency of subjective symptoms of facial dermatitis. Using a cross-sectional interviewer-administered questionnaire it was possible to assess the percentage prevalence of each of 3 facial dermatitis symptoms among both low humidity exposed and non-exposed workers. The two prevalences were compared by calculating a ratio (the percentage prevalence ratio or PPR) of the prevalence of symptoms in the exposed, to that in the non-exposed workforce. A confidence interval (CI) for the PPR was also calculated. For the symptom of itching, the PPR was 1.65 (CI 1.32-2.07) in favour of the study group, whilst for the symptoms of redness and urticaria the PPRs were 1.96 (CI 1.54-2.48) and 2.53 (CI 1.40-4.59) respectively. The occurrence of a greater prevalence of all symptoms in the low-humidity exposed workforce confirms the clinical and laboratory reports of previous workers. A comparison was also made between the two groups of workers of both the severity, and the frequency of occurrence of symptoms. Whilst there was no statistically significant difference between the exposed and non-exposed groups for prevalence of one symptom, among those who had experienced two symptoms there was a PPR of 2.43 (CI 1.37-4.30) between the two groups. Furthermore, among those workers who had experienced all 3 symptoms of facial dermatitis there was a PPR of 3.38 (CI 1.18-8.93) in favour of the low-humidity exposed workforce.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"37-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/41.1.37\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/41.1.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/41.1.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

对71名工作环境为温尘控制的低湿度“洁净室”的男性员工与144名工作环境为自然工厂环境的男性员工进行了面部皮炎主观症状发生、严重程度和频率的周期百分比患病率比较。使用横断面访谈者管理的问卷,可以评估低湿度暴露和非暴露工人中3种面部皮炎症状的患病率百分比。通过计算暴露者的症状流行率与未暴露工作人员的症状流行率的比率(百分比流行率或PPR)来比较这两种流行率。还计算了PPR的置信区间(CI)。对于瘙痒症状,研究组的PPR为1.65 (CI 1.32-2.07),而对于发红和荨麻疹症状,PPR分别为1.96 (CI 1.54-2.48)和2.53 (CI 1.40-4.59)。在低湿度暴露的工作人员中,所有症状的发生率更高,这证实了以前工作人员的临床和实验室报告。还比较了两组工人的严重程度和出现症状的频率。虽然暴露组和非暴露组在一种症状的患病率上没有统计学上的显著差异,但在经历两种症状的人群中,两组之间的PPR为2.43 (CI 1.37-4.30)。此外,在经历过所有3种面部皮炎症状的工人中,有利于低湿度暴露劳动力的PPR为3.38 (CI 1.18-8.93)。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clean rooms and itchy faces.

Seventy-one male employees whose working environment was a temperature and dust controlled low-humidity 'Clean Room' and 144 male employees working in a natural factory environment were compared by means of period percentage prevalences of occurrence, severity and frequency of subjective symptoms of facial dermatitis. Using a cross-sectional interviewer-administered questionnaire it was possible to assess the percentage prevalence of each of 3 facial dermatitis symptoms among both low humidity exposed and non-exposed workers. The two prevalences were compared by calculating a ratio (the percentage prevalence ratio or PPR) of the prevalence of symptoms in the exposed, to that in the non-exposed workforce. A confidence interval (CI) for the PPR was also calculated. For the symptom of itching, the PPR was 1.65 (CI 1.32-2.07) in favour of the study group, whilst for the symptoms of redness and urticaria the PPRs were 1.96 (CI 1.54-2.48) and 2.53 (CI 1.40-4.59) respectively. The occurrence of a greater prevalence of all symptoms in the low-humidity exposed workforce confirms the clinical and laboratory reports of previous workers. A comparison was also made between the two groups of workers of both the severity, and the frequency of occurrence of symptoms. Whilst there was no statistically significant difference between the exposed and non-exposed groups for prevalence of one symptom, among those who had experienced two symptoms there was a PPR of 2.43 (CI 1.37-4.30) between the two groups. Furthermore, among those workers who had experienced all 3 symptoms of facial dermatitis there was a PPR of 3.38 (CI 1.18-8.93) in favour of the low-humidity exposed workforce.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信