[68Ga]-NOTA-LSA动态PET成像定量大鼠肝功能储备

Peihan Li, Wenxiang Ding, Qian Xia, Qiu Huang
{"title":"[68Ga]-NOTA-LSA动态PET成像定量大鼠肝功能储备","authors":"Peihan Li, Wenxiang Ding, Qian Xia, Qiu Huang","doi":"10.1109/ICPECA51329.2021.9362592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preoperative evaluation of hepatic functional reserve determines the safe extent in liver resection. Existing methods assess only the global reserve rather than the local distribution. This work aims to quantify the regional hepatic functional reserve in vivo. We used [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA PET/CT to image nine rats, two with cirrhosis. Each rat underwent a 20-min dynamic PET scan. Data were modelled by a two-compartment model with a hepatic dual-input function. Based on the model, we calculated the distribution volume (DV) of [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA in the liver via two approaches (denoted DV1 and DV2). For comparison, we also calculated the static PET metric standard uptake value (SUV). Using DV and SUV maps, we calculated functional liver ratio (FLR). The results of DV maps show local heterogeneity of the liver. Significant difference between normal and liver-impaired rats can be seen both in DV1 and DV2, but not in SUV. FLR, when obtained through the DV map, is negatively correlated with three test indices of the liver function, i.e., alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Specifically, FLR obtained using DV2 shows stronger negative correlation (rALT =-0.932;rAST =-0.914;rLDI1=-0.907, all with p<0.01) than that obtained using DV1 (rALT =-0.924;rAST =-0.905;rLDH=-0.901, all with p<0.01). No correlation is found in FLR if it is calculated using SUV. In conclusions, Dynamic PET with [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA evaluates the regional hepatic functional reserve, and enables differentiation between normal and impaired livers. However, SUV, the static [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA uptake, alone does not.","PeriodicalId":119798,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications (ICPECA)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying hepatic functional reserve in rats via dynamic PET imaging using [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA\",\"authors\":\"Peihan Li, Wenxiang Ding, Qian Xia, Qiu Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPECA51329.2021.9362592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preoperative evaluation of hepatic functional reserve determines the safe extent in liver resection. Existing methods assess only the global reserve rather than the local distribution. This work aims to quantify the regional hepatic functional reserve in vivo. We used [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA PET/CT to image nine rats, two with cirrhosis. Each rat underwent a 20-min dynamic PET scan. Data were modelled by a two-compartment model with a hepatic dual-input function. Based on the model, we calculated the distribution volume (DV) of [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA in the liver via two approaches (denoted DV1 and DV2). For comparison, we also calculated the static PET metric standard uptake value (SUV). Using DV and SUV maps, we calculated functional liver ratio (FLR). The results of DV maps show local heterogeneity of the liver. Significant difference between normal and liver-impaired rats can be seen both in DV1 and DV2, but not in SUV. FLR, when obtained through the DV map, is negatively correlated with three test indices of the liver function, i.e., alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Specifically, FLR obtained using DV2 shows stronger negative correlation (rALT =-0.932;rAST =-0.914;rLDI1=-0.907, all with p<0.01) than that obtained using DV1 (rALT =-0.924;rAST =-0.905;rLDH=-0.901, all with p<0.01). No correlation is found in FLR if it is calculated using SUV. In conclusions, Dynamic PET with [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA evaluates the regional hepatic functional reserve, and enables differentiation between normal and impaired livers. However, SUV, the static [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA uptake, alone does not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications (ICPECA)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications (ICPECA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPECA51329.2021.9362592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications (ICPECA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPECA51329.2021.9362592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术前肝功能储备的评估决定了肝切除术的安全程度。现有的方法只评估全球储量,而不是局部分布。这项工作旨在量化体内区域肝脏功能储备。我们使用[68Ga]-NOTA-LSA PET/CT对9只大鼠进行成像,其中2只为肝硬化。每只大鼠进行20分钟动态PET扫描。数据采用具有肝脏双输入功能的双室模型建模。基于该模型,我们通过DV1和DV2两种途径计算了[68Ga]-NOTA-LSA在肝脏中的分布体积(DV)。为了比较,我们还计算了静态PET度量标准摄取值(SUV)。利用DV和SUV图计算功能肝比(FLR)。DV图的结果显示肝脏的局部异质性。正常大鼠与肝损伤大鼠的DV1、DV2均有显著性差异,但SUV无显著性差异。通过DV图得到的FLR与肝功能的三项检测指标丙氨酸转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平呈负相关。其中,DV2法与DV1法的FLR (rALT =-0.932, rAST =-0.914, rLDI1=-0.907,均p<0.01)负相关更强(rALT =-0.924, rAST =-0.905, rLDH=-0.901,均p<0.01)。如果使用SUV计算FLR,则没有发现相关性。综上所述,采用[68Ga]-NOTA-LSA的动态PET可评估局部肝脏功能储备,并可区分正常肝脏和受损肝脏。然而,SUV,静态[68Ga]-NOTA-LSA摄取,单独没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying hepatic functional reserve in rats via dynamic PET imaging using [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA
Preoperative evaluation of hepatic functional reserve determines the safe extent in liver resection. Existing methods assess only the global reserve rather than the local distribution. This work aims to quantify the regional hepatic functional reserve in vivo. We used [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA PET/CT to image nine rats, two with cirrhosis. Each rat underwent a 20-min dynamic PET scan. Data were modelled by a two-compartment model with a hepatic dual-input function. Based on the model, we calculated the distribution volume (DV) of [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA in the liver via two approaches (denoted DV1 and DV2). For comparison, we also calculated the static PET metric standard uptake value (SUV). Using DV and SUV maps, we calculated functional liver ratio (FLR). The results of DV maps show local heterogeneity of the liver. Significant difference between normal and liver-impaired rats can be seen both in DV1 and DV2, but not in SUV. FLR, when obtained through the DV map, is negatively correlated with three test indices of the liver function, i.e., alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Specifically, FLR obtained using DV2 shows stronger negative correlation (rALT =-0.932;rAST =-0.914;rLDI1=-0.907, all with p<0.01) than that obtained using DV1 (rALT =-0.924;rAST =-0.905;rLDH=-0.901, all with p<0.01). No correlation is found in FLR if it is calculated using SUV. In conclusions, Dynamic PET with [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA evaluates the regional hepatic functional reserve, and enables differentiation between normal and impaired livers. However, SUV, the static [68Ga]-NOTA-LSA uptake, alone does not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信