为获得最大的融资投资回报而努力

J. Greenfield
{"title":"为获得最大的融资投资回报而努力","authors":"J. Greenfield","doi":"10.1002/PF.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accountability in fundraising often is focused on cost-benefit ratios, not how each of the individual solicitation methods performed. “How much did you raise” has been replaced with “How much did it cost?” and “How do our results compare with others'?”","PeriodicalId":149623,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hardwiring for maximum fundraising return on investment\",\"authors\":\"J. Greenfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/PF.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accountability in fundraising often is focused on cost-benefit ratios, not how each of the individual solicitation methods performed. “How much did you raise” has been replaced with “How much did it cost?” and “How do our results compare with others'?”\",\"PeriodicalId\":149623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/PF.117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/PF.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

筹资的问责制往往集中在成本效益比上,而不是每一种筹款方式的表现。“你筹集了多少钱”已经被“花了多少钱?”和“我们的结果和别人的相比如何?”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hardwiring for maximum fundraising return on investment
Accountability in fundraising often is focused on cost-benefit ratios, not how each of the individual solicitation methods performed. “How much did you raise” has been replaced with “How much did it cost?” and “How do our results compare with others'?”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信