两种渗透仪在标准样品上的精度:电阻抗技术和凝固点降低技术

C. García-Resúa, Hugo Pena-Verdeal, M. Miñones, Jorge Gilino, M. .. Giraldez, E. Yebra-Pimentel
{"title":"两种渗透仪在标准样品上的精度:电阻抗技术和凝固点降低技术","authors":"C. García-Resúa, Hugo Pena-Verdeal, M. Miñones, Jorge Gilino, M. .. Giraldez, E. Yebra-Pimentel","doi":"10.1117/12.2030428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High tear fluid osmolarity is a feature common to all types of dry eye. This study was designed to establish the accuracy of two osmometers, a freezing point depression osmometer (Fiske 110) and an electrical impedance osmometer (TearLab™) by using standard samples. To assess the accuracy of the measurements provided by the two instruments we used 5 solutions of known osmolarity/osmolality; 50, 290 and 850 mOsm/kg and 292 and 338 mOsm/L. Fiske 110 is designed to be used in samples of 20 μl, so measurements were made on 1:9, 1:4, 1:1 and 1:0 dilutions of the standards. Tear Lab is addressed to be used in tear film and only a sample of 0.05 μl is required, so no dilutions were employed. Due to the smaller measurement range of the TearLab, the 50 and 850 mOsm/kg standards were not included. 20 measurements per standard sample were used and differences with the reference value was analysed by one sample t-test. Fiske 110 showed that osmolarity measurements differed statistically from standard values except those recorded for 290 mOsm/kg standard diluted 1:1 (p = 0.309), the 292 mOsm/L H2O sample (1:1) and 338 mOsm/L H2O standard (1:4). The more diluted the sample, the higher the error rate. For the TearLab measurements, one-sample t-test indicated that all determinations differed from the theoretical values (p = 0.001), though differences were always small. For undiluted solutions, Fiske 110 shows similar performance than TearLab. However, for the diluted standards, Fiske 110 worsens.","PeriodicalId":135913,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican Meeting of Optics and the Latin American Meeting of Optics, Lasers and Their Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of two osmometers on standard samples: electrical impedance technique and freezing point depression technique\",\"authors\":\"C. García-Resúa, Hugo Pena-Verdeal, M. Miñones, Jorge Gilino, M. .. Giraldez, E. Yebra-Pimentel\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2030428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High tear fluid osmolarity is a feature common to all types of dry eye. This study was designed to establish the accuracy of two osmometers, a freezing point depression osmometer (Fiske 110) and an electrical impedance osmometer (TearLab™) by using standard samples. To assess the accuracy of the measurements provided by the two instruments we used 5 solutions of known osmolarity/osmolality; 50, 290 and 850 mOsm/kg and 292 and 338 mOsm/L. Fiske 110 is designed to be used in samples of 20 μl, so measurements were made on 1:9, 1:4, 1:1 and 1:0 dilutions of the standards. Tear Lab is addressed to be used in tear film and only a sample of 0.05 μl is required, so no dilutions were employed. Due to the smaller measurement range of the TearLab, the 50 and 850 mOsm/kg standards were not included. 20 measurements per standard sample were used and differences with the reference value was analysed by one sample t-test. Fiske 110 showed that osmolarity measurements differed statistically from standard values except those recorded for 290 mOsm/kg standard diluted 1:1 (p = 0.309), the 292 mOsm/L H2O sample (1:1) and 338 mOsm/L H2O standard (1:4). The more diluted the sample, the higher the error rate. For the TearLab measurements, one-sample t-test indicated that all determinations differed from the theoretical values (p = 0.001), though differences were always small. For undiluted solutions, Fiske 110 shows similar performance than TearLab. However, for the diluted standards, Fiske 110 worsens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iberoamerican Meeting of Optics and the Latin American Meeting of Optics, Lasers and Their Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iberoamerican Meeting of Optics and the Latin American Meeting of Optics, Lasers and Their Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2030428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iberoamerican Meeting of Optics and the Latin American Meeting of Optics, Lasers and Their Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2030428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

高泪液渗透压是所有类型的干眼症的共同特征。本研究旨在通过使用标准样品建立两种渗透仪的准确性,一种是冰点下降渗透仪(Fiske 110),另一种是电阻抗渗透仪(TearLab™)。为了评估这两种仪器提供的测量结果的准确性,我们使用了5种已知的渗透压/渗透压溶液;50、290、850 mOsm/kg和292、338 mOsm/L。Fiske 110设计用于20 μl的样品,因此在1:9,1:4,1:1和1:0的稀释度下进行测量。泪液实验室被指定用于泪膜,只需要0.05 μl的样品,所以没有使用稀释。由于TearLab的测量范围较小,因此没有包括50和850 mOsm/kg标准。每个标准样本使用20个测量值,并通过一个样本t检验分析与参考值的差异。Fiske 110表明,除稀释比例为1:1的290 mOsm/kg标准品(p = 0.309)、稀释比例为1:1的292 mOsm/L H2O样品和稀释比例为1:4的338 mOsm/L H2O标准品外,渗透压测量值与标准值有统计学差异。样品越稀释,错误率越高。对于TearLab测量,单样本t检验表明所有测定值都与理论值不同(p = 0.001),尽管差异总是很小。对于未稀释溶液,Fiske 110的性能与TearLab相似。然而,对于稀释后的标准,Fiske 110恶化了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of two osmometers on standard samples: electrical impedance technique and freezing point depression technique
High tear fluid osmolarity is a feature common to all types of dry eye. This study was designed to establish the accuracy of two osmometers, a freezing point depression osmometer (Fiske 110) and an electrical impedance osmometer (TearLab™) by using standard samples. To assess the accuracy of the measurements provided by the two instruments we used 5 solutions of known osmolarity/osmolality; 50, 290 and 850 mOsm/kg and 292 and 338 mOsm/L. Fiske 110 is designed to be used in samples of 20 μl, so measurements were made on 1:9, 1:4, 1:1 and 1:0 dilutions of the standards. Tear Lab is addressed to be used in tear film and only a sample of 0.05 μl is required, so no dilutions were employed. Due to the smaller measurement range of the TearLab, the 50 and 850 mOsm/kg standards were not included. 20 measurements per standard sample were used and differences with the reference value was analysed by one sample t-test. Fiske 110 showed that osmolarity measurements differed statistically from standard values except those recorded for 290 mOsm/kg standard diluted 1:1 (p = 0.309), the 292 mOsm/L H2O sample (1:1) and 338 mOsm/L H2O standard (1:4). The more diluted the sample, the higher the error rate. For the TearLab measurements, one-sample t-test indicated that all determinations differed from the theoretical values (p = 0.001), though differences were always small. For undiluted solutions, Fiske 110 shows similar performance than TearLab. However, for the diluted standards, Fiske 110 worsens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信