风险厌恶对市场结果的影响:一个随机两阶段均衡模型

S. J. Kazempour, P. Pinson
{"title":"风险厌恶对市场结果的影响:一个随机两阶段均衡模型","authors":"S. J. Kazempour, P. Pinson","doi":"10.1109/PMAPS.2016.7764200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evaluates how different risk preferences of electricity producers alter the market-clearing outcomes. Toward this goal, we propose a stochastic equilibrium model for electricity markets with two settlements, i.e., day-ahead and balancing, in which a number of conventional and stochastic renewable (e.g., wind power) producers compete. We assume that all producers are price-taking and can be risk-averse, while loads are inelastic to price. Renewable power production is the only source of uncertainty considered. The risk of profit variability of each producer is incorporated into the model using the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) metric. The proposed equilibrium model consists of several risk-constrained profit maximization problems (one per producer), several curtailment cost minimization problems (one per load), and power balance constraints. Each optimization problem is then replaced by its optimality conditions, resulting in a mixed complementarity problem. Numerical results from a case study based on the IEEE one-area reliability test system are derived and discussed.","PeriodicalId":265474,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of risk aversion on market outcomes: A stochastic two-stage equilibrium model\",\"authors\":\"S. J. Kazempour, P. Pinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PMAPS.2016.7764200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper evaluates how different risk preferences of electricity producers alter the market-clearing outcomes. Toward this goal, we propose a stochastic equilibrium model for electricity markets with two settlements, i.e., day-ahead and balancing, in which a number of conventional and stochastic renewable (e.g., wind power) producers compete. We assume that all producers are price-taking and can be risk-averse, while loads are inelastic to price. Renewable power production is the only source of uncertainty considered. The risk of profit variability of each producer is incorporated into the model using the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) metric. The proposed equilibrium model consists of several risk-constrained profit maximization problems (one per producer), several curtailment cost minimization problems (one per load), and power balance constraints. Each optimization problem is then replaced by its optimality conditions, resulting in a mixed complementarity problem. Numerical results from a case study based on the IEEE one-area reliability test system are derived and discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMAPS.2016.7764200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMAPS.2016.7764200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文评估了电力生产商不同的风险偏好对市场出清结果的影响。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一个电力市场的随机均衡模型,该模型具有两种解决方案,即日前和平衡,其中许多传统和随机可再生能源(例如风力发电)生产商竞争。我们假设所有的生产者都接受价格并且可能厌恶风险,而负荷对价格没有弹性。可再生能源生产是考虑到的唯一不确定性来源。使用条件风险值(CVaR)度量,将每个生产商的利润变化风险纳入模型。所提出的均衡模型包括几个风险约束下的利润最大化问题(每个生产者一个)、几个削减成本最小化问题(每个负荷一个)和电力平衡约束。然后将每个优化问题替换为其最优性条件,从而产生混合互补问题。并对基于IEEE单区域可靠性测试系统的数值结果进行了推导和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of risk aversion on market outcomes: A stochastic two-stage equilibrium model
This paper evaluates how different risk preferences of electricity producers alter the market-clearing outcomes. Toward this goal, we propose a stochastic equilibrium model for electricity markets with two settlements, i.e., day-ahead and balancing, in which a number of conventional and stochastic renewable (e.g., wind power) producers compete. We assume that all producers are price-taking and can be risk-averse, while loads are inelastic to price. Renewable power production is the only source of uncertainty considered. The risk of profit variability of each producer is incorporated into the model using the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) metric. The proposed equilibrium model consists of several risk-constrained profit maximization problems (one per producer), several curtailment cost minimization problems (one per load), and power balance constraints. Each optimization problem is then replaced by its optimality conditions, resulting in a mixed complementarity problem. Numerical results from a case study based on the IEEE one-area reliability test system are derived and discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信