大肠穿孔所致腹膜炎剖腹探查术后预后的前瞻性评价

P. Siddharth, P. Tushar, M. Sanjay, S. Hardeep, Pandey Tanica
{"title":"大肠穿孔所致腹膜炎剖腹探查术后预后的前瞻性评价","authors":"P. Siddharth, P. Tushar, M. Sanjay, S. Hardeep, Pandey Tanica","doi":"10.5530/OGH.2018.7.2.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2018 Phcog.Net. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Cite this article: Siddharth P, Tushar P, Sanjay M, Hardeep S, Tanica P. Prospective Evaluation of Outcome following Exploratory Laparotomy in Patients with Peritonitis due to Large Bowel Perforation. OGH Reports. 2018;7(2):91-4. ABSTRACT Context: Large bowel perforation is mostly seen in association with colo-rectal carcinoma. Diverticulitis is a common cause for large bowel perforation in the west while it is rarely seen in India. Recent studies advocate a primary procedure in the setting of large bowel perforations. Aims: The study was done to study the etiology, management and outcome of large bowel perforations. Settings and Design: This was a prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted over a period of three years including 24 patients with large bowel perforations who underwent exploratory laparotomy. Surgical procedure was planned on basis of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI). Outcome in terms of mortality rate during index admission was evaluated. Statistical analysis used: The Chi square test and student’s t test were used for qualitative and quantitative variables respectively. The factors found significant on Univariate analysis were assessed in a multivariate analysis. Results: Colo-rectal carcinoma was the most common aetiology present in 12 (50%) cases. Hartmann’s procedure was done in 17 (70.9%) patients. Primary anastomosis was done in 4 patients and all of them faired well post-operatively. On multivariate analysis septic shock at presentation (OR=23.3, 95% CI=1.7-2.0, p<0.001) and MPI>35 (OR=17.8, 95% CI=1.5-1.9, p=0.006) were found to be the significant factors associated with mortality. All the bacterial isolates in peritoneal fluid culture samples were extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) producing species. Conclusion: A primary procedure can be safely carried out in patients of large bowel perforation with a low MPI. MPI serves as useful guide to plan surgical procedure and predict the outcome.","PeriodicalId":166206,"journal":{"name":"Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Reports","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Evaluation of Outcome following Exploratory Laparotomy in Patients with Peritonitis due to Large Bowel Perforation\",\"authors\":\"P. Siddharth, P. Tushar, M. Sanjay, S. Hardeep, Pandey Tanica\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/OGH.2018.7.2.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Copyright © 2018 Phcog.Net. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Cite this article: Siddharth P, Tushar P, Sanjay M, Hardeep S, Tanica P. Prospective Evaluation of Outcome following Exploratory Laparotomy in Patients with Peritonitis due to Large Bowel Perforation. OGH Reports. 2018;7(2):91-4. ABSTRACT Context: Large bowel perforation is mostly seen in association with colo-rectal carcinoma. Diverticulitis is a common cause for large bowel perforation in the west while it is rarely seen in India. Recent studies advocate a primary procedure in the setting of large bowel perforations. Aims: The study was done to study the etiology, management and outcome of large bowel perforations. Settings and Design: This was a prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted over a period of three years including 24 patients with large bowel perforations who underwent exploratory laparotomy. Surgical procedure was planned on basis of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI). Outcome in terms of mortality rate during index admission was evaluated. Statistical analysis used: The Chi square test and student’s t test were used for qualitative and quantitative variables respectively. The factors found significant on Univariate analysis were assessed in a multivariate analysis. Results: Colo-rectal carcinoma was the most common aetiology present in 12 (50%) cases. Hartmann’s procedure was done in 17 (70.9%) patients. Primary anastomosis was done in 4 patients and all of them faired well post-operatively. On multivariate analysis septic shock at presentation (OR=23.3, 95% CI=1.7-2.0, p<0.001) and MPI>35 (OR=17.8, 95% CI=1.5-1.9, p=0.006) were found to be the significant factors associated with mortality. All the bacterial isolates in peritoneal fluid culture samples were extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) producing species. Conclusion: A primary procedure can be safely carried out in patients of large bowel perforation with a low MPI. MPI serves as useful guide to plan surgical procedure and predict the outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Reports\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/OGH.2018.7.2.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/OGH.2018.7.2.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

版权所有©2018phcog.net这是一篇基于知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议的开放获取文章。引用本文:Siddharth P, Tushar P, Sanjay M, Hardeep S, Tanica P.剖腹探查术治疗大肠穿孔所致腹膜炎的疗效评价。健康报告,2018;7(2):91-4。摘要背景:大肠穿孔多见于结直肠癌。憩室炎在西方是大肠穿孔的常见原因,而在印度却很少见。最近的研究提倡在大肠穿孔的情况下进行初级手术。目的:研究大肠穿孔的病因、治疗和预后。背景和设计:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究。材料和方法:本研究历时三年,包括24例经剖腹探查的大肠穿孔患者。根据Mannheim腹膜炎指数(MPI)计划手术。以入院时的死亡率作为评价指标。采用统计分析:定性变量采用卡方检验,定量变量采用学生t检验。在单因素分析中发现的显著因素在多因素分析中进行评估。结果:结直肠癌是最常见的病因,12例(50%)。17例(70.9%)患者行Hartmann手术。4例患者均行一期吻合,术后效果良好。在多因素分析中,脓毒性休克(OR=23.3, 95% CI=1.7-2.0, p35 (OR=17.8, 95% CI=1.5-1.9, p=0.006)被发现是与死亡率相关的重要因素。腹膜液培养样品中分离的细菌均为广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)产生菌。结论:对于低MPI的大肠穿孔患者,一期手术可以安全进行。MPI可作为外科手术计划和预后预测的有用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Evaluation of Outcome following Exploratory Laparotomy in Patients with Peritonitis due to Large Bowel Perforation
Copyright © 2018 Phcog.Net. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Cite this article: Siddharth P, Tushar P, Sanjay M, Hardeep S, Tanica P. Prospective Evaluation of Outcome following Exploratory Laparotomy in Patients with Peritonitis due to Large Bowel Perforation. OGH Reports. 2018;7(2):91-4. ABSTRACT Context: Large bowel perforation is mostly seen in association with colo-rectal carcinoma. Diverticulitis is a common cause for large bowel perforation in the west while it is rarely seen in India. Recent studies advocate a primary procedure in the setting of large bowel perforations. Aims: The study was done to study the etiology, management and outcome of large bowel perforations. Settings and Design: This was a prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted over a period of three years including 24 patients with large bowel perforations who underwent exploratory laparotomy. Surgical procedure was planned on basis of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI). Outcome in terms of mortality rate during index admission was evaluated. Statistical analysis used: The Chi square test and student’s t test were used for qualitative and quantitative variables respectively. The factors found significant on Univariate analysis were assessed in a multivariate analysis. Results: Colo-rectal carcinoma was the most common aetiology present in 12 (50%) cases. Hartmann’s procedure was done in 17 (70.9%) patients. Primary anastomosis was done in 4 patients and all of them faired well post-operatively. On multivariate analysis septic shock at presentation (OR=23.3, 95% CI=1.7-2.0, p<0.001) and MPI>35 (OR=17.8, 95% CI=1.5-1.9, p=0.006) were found to be the significant factors associated with mortality. All the bacterial isolates in peritoneal fluid culture samples were extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) producing species. Conclusion: A primary procedure can be safely carried out in patients of large bowel perforation with a low MPI. MPI serves as useful guide to plan surgical procedure and predict the outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信