解除辅助清盘的神秘性:废除地方实体和程序规则

Look Chan Ho
{"title":"解除辅助清盘的神秘性:废除地方实体和程序规则","authors":"Look Chan Ho","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1081187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Scottish decision in Morris (Liquidator of Bank of Credit & Commerce International), Re Petition of The Bank of England is correct that an ancillary winding-up makes good sense and may disapply local procedural rules that do not serve any practical purpose. Owing to a misunderstanding of the English authorities and the principle of pari passu distribution, the Scottish court wrongly concluded that local substantive rules may not be disapplied.","PeriodicalId":129013,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Law eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystifying Ancillary Winding-Up: Disapplying Local Substantive and Procedural Rules\",\"authors\":\"Look Chan Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1081187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Scottish decision in Morris (Liquidator of Bank of Credit & Commerce International), Re Petition of The Bank of England is correct that an ancillary winding-up makes good sense and may disapply local procedural rules that do not serve any practical purpose. Owing to a misunderstanding of the English authorities and the principle of pari passu distribution, the Scottish court wrongly concluded that local substantive rules may not be disapplied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy of Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy of Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1081187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1081187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苏格兰在莫里斯(国际信贷商业银行清算人)诉英格兰银行重审案中的决定是正确的,即辅助清盘是有道理的,可能会废除没有任何实际目的的当地程序规则。由于对英格兰当局和同等权利分配原则的误解,苏格兰法院错误地得出地方实体法不能被废除的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demystifying Ancillary Winding-Up: Disapplying Local Substantive and Procedural Rules
The Scottish decision in Morris (Liquidator of Bank of Credit & Commerce International), Re Petition of The Bank of England is correct that an ancillary winding-up makes good sense and may disapply local procedural rules that do not serve any practical purpose. Owing to a misunderstanding of the English authorities and the principle of pari passu distribution, the Scottish court wrongly concluded that local substantive rules may not be disapplied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信