2011-2016年伊斯兰银行与传统银行财务绩效比较分析

E. Juniardi, E. S. Siregar, Farida Aini, Djaya Putra Gani
{"title":"2011-2016年伊斯兰银行与传统银行财务绩效比较分析","authors":"E. Juniardi, E. S. Siregar, Farida Aini, Djaya Putra Gani","doi":"10.2991/piceeba2-18.2019.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to find out whether there are significant differences regarding the performance of Sharia banking and conventional banking as a whole in Indonesia in the period 2011-2016. This research is an exploratory research with quantitative methods. The sampling technique is done by using purposive sampling method with the number of samples is 8 banks, 4 banks for Islamic banks (PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri, Bank BTN Syariah, Bank BNI Syariah and BRI Sharia), and 4 banks for Conventional banks (Bank Mandiri, Bank BTN, Bank BNI and BRI Bank). This study uses a different test with the SPSS version 22.00 program. The results showed that Islamic banking has a better LDR compared to conventional banks' LDR, conventional banks have better CAR compared to CAR of Islamic banks, conventional banks have better ROA compared to ROA of Islamic banks, conventional banks have better ROE compared to ROE of Islamic Banks, conventional banks have better BOPO compared to BOPO Islamic Banks.","PeriodicalId":251790,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2018)","volume":"226 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Financial Performance of Islamic Banks And Conventional Banks For The 2011-2016 Period.\",\"authors\":\"E. Juniardi, E. S. Siregar, Farida Aini, Djaya Putra Gani\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/piceeba2-18.2019.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this research is to find out whether there are significant differences regarding the performance of Sharia banking and conventional banking as a whole in Indonesia in the period 2011-2016. This research is an exploratory research with quantitative methods. The sampling technique is done by using purposive sampling method with the number of samples is 8 banks, 4 banks for Islamic banks (PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri, Bank BTN Syariah, Bank BNI Syariah and BRI Sharia), and 4 banks for Conventional banks (Bank Mandiri, Bank BTN, Bank BNI and BRI Bank). This study uses a different test with the SPSS version 22.00 program. The results showed that Islamic banking has a better LDR compared to conventional banks' LDR, conventional banks have better CAR compared to CAR of Islamic banks, conventional banks have better ROA compared to ROA of Islamic banks, conventional banks have better ROE compared to ROE of Islamic Banks, conventional banks have better BOPO compared to BOPO Islamic Banks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2018)\",\"volume\":\"226 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/piceeba2-18.2019.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/piceeba2-18.2019.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是找出在2011-2016年期间,印尼伊斯兰银行和传统银行的整体绩效是否存在显著差异。本研究是一项采用定量方法的探索性研究。抽样技术是通过使用有目的的抽样方法完成的,样本数量为8家银行,4家银行为伊斯兰银行(PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri, Bank BTN Syariah, Bank BNI Syariah和BRI Sharia), 4家银行为传统银行(Bank Mandiri, Bank BTN, Bank BNI和BRI银行)。本研究使用SPSS 22.00版本程序进行不同的测试。结果表明,伊斯兰银行的LDR比传统银行的LDR好,传统银行的CAR比伊斯兰银行的CAR好,传统银行的ROA比伊斯兰银行的ROA好,传统银行的ROE比伊斯兰银行的ROE好,传统银行的BOPO比BOPO的伊斯兰银行好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of the Financial Performance of Islamic Banks And Conventional Banks For The 2011-2016 Period.
The aim of this research is to find out whether there are significant differences regarding the performance of Sharia banking and conventional banking as a whole in Indonesia in the period 2011-2016. This research is an exploratory research with quantitative methods. The sampling technique is done by using purposive sampling method with the number of samples is 8 banks, 4 banks for Islamic banks (PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri, Bank BTN Syariah, Bank BNI Syariah and BRI Sharia), and 4 banks for Conventional banks (Bank Mandiri, Bank BTN, Bank BNI and BRI Bank). This study uses a different test with the SPSS version 22.00 program. The results showed that Islamic banking has a better LDR compared to conventional banks' LDR, conventional banks have better CAR compared to CAR of Islamic banks, conventional banks have better ROA compared to ROA of Islamic banks, conventional banks have better ROE compared to ROE of Islamic Banks, conventional banks have better BOPO compared to BOPO Islamic Banks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信