Stuart W. Shulman, Namhee Kwon, E. Hovy, Emily Huisman
{"title":"规则工具:技术转让和电子规则制定","authors":"Stuart W. Shulman, Namhee Kwon, E. Hovy, Emily Huisman","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2008.454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large-scale, email public comment campaigns in the United States necessitate the creation of new, specially tailored power tools for language. We call these applications \"tools for rules\". This paper introduces the rule writers' workbench, a system developed specifically for dealing with the influx of public comments. We describe the context in which these tools were developed and report on our first round of usability testing. Our major finding is that a particular tool ('DURIAN' or duplicate removal In large collection) performs a critical function in the era of burgeoning email campaigns. We provide a glimpse into the real world testbed provided by over 540,000 emails submitted to the Fish & Wildlife Service on the proposed listing of the polar bear as \"threatened\" under the Endangered Species Act. Finally, we conclude with observations about the likely political considerations as tools like DURIAN become more commonplace on the desktop of regulatory rule writers.","PeriodicalId":328874,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tools for Rules: Technology Transfer and Electronic Rulemaking\",\"authors\":\"Stuart W. Shulman, Namhee Kwon, E. Hovy, Emily Huisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2008.454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large-scale, email public comment campaigns in the United States necessitate the creation of new, specially tailored power tools for language. We call these applications \\\"tools for rules\\\". This paper introduces the rule writers' workbench, a system developed specifically for dealing with the influx of public comments. We describe the context in which these tools were developed and report on our first round of usability testing. Our major finding is that a particular tool ('DURIAN' or duplicate removal In large collection) performs a critical function in the era of burgeoning email campaigns. We provide a glimpse into the real world testbed provided by over 540,000 emails submitted to the Fish & Wildlife Service on the proposed listing of the polar bear as \\\"threatened\\\" under the Endangered Species Act. Finally, we conclude with observations about the likely political considerations as tools like DURIAN become more commonplace on the desktop of regulatory rule writers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tools for Rules: Technology Transfer and Electronic Rulemaking
Large-scale, email public comment campaigns in the United States necessitate the creation of new, specially tailored power tools for language. We call these applications "tools for rules". This paper introduces the rule writers' workbench, a system developed specifically for dealing with the influx of public comments. We describe the context in which these tools were developed and report on our first round of usability testing. Our major finding is that a particular tool ('DURIAN' or duplicate removal In large collection) performs a critical function in the era of burgeoning email campaigns. We provide a glimpse into the real world testbed provided by over 540,000 emails submitted to the Fish & Wildlife Service on the proposed listing of the polar bear as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act. Finally, we conclude with observations about the likely political considerations as tools like DURIAN become more commonplace on the desktop of regulatory rule writers.