西印度群岛瓜德罗普岛巴纳尼尔河中对生淡水虾(十足目:虾纲)的通道设施

É. Fièvet
{"title":"西印度群岛瓜德罗普岛巴纳尼尔河中对生淡水虾(十足目:虾纲)的通道设施","authors":"É. Fièvet","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200003/04)16:2<101::AID-RRR569>3.0.CO;2-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relative selectivity of two fast-flowing concrete channels acting as passage facilities for shrimps was investigated at two low-head dams by comparing shrimps migrating through the channels to shrimps captured by experimental (trapping) passes offering splash zones. Complementary visual observations of shrimp behaviour were also carried out. At both dams (150 and 320 m above sea level (a.s.l.)), the upstream migration was mainly undertaken by small (subjuvenile) individuals but some larger ones, notably Atya innocous adults, were also captured. Strong water currents (1.5 m s−1) in the concrete channels compelled most shrimps to climb over the vertical walls but only the smallest individuals were able to do this. Thus, lower proportions of larger individuals were captured in the passage facilities than in the experimental passes. In the same way, the lightly built Macrobrachium spp. was found in lower proportions in the passage facilities than in the experimental passes. Furthermore, because of submerged orifices and whirling currents, the continuous-flow tanks which supplied the channels with water trapped numerous climbing shrimps. Hence, because they do not take biological criteria into account, the passage facilities investigated here were not only selective but also inefficient for shrimps. Finally, the benefits of such installations for shrimps are doubtful and simple waterfalls flowing over spillways would be at least as efficient, if not more so. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Passage facilities for Diadromous freshwater shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea) in the Bananier River, Guadeloupe, West Indies\",\"authors\":\"É. Fièvet\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200003/04)16:2<101::AID-RRR569>3.0.CO;2-T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relative selectivity of two fast-flowing concrete channels acting as passage facilities for shrimps was investigated at two low-head dams by comparing shrimps migrating through the channels to shrimps captured by experimental (trapping) passes offering splash zones. Complementary visual observations of shrimp behaviour were also carried out. At both dams (150 and 320 m above sea level (a.s.l.)), the upstream migration was mainly undertaken by small (subjuvenile) individuals but some larger ones, notably Atya innocous adults, were also captured. Strong water currents (1.5 m s−1) in the concrete channels compelled most shrimps to climb over the vertical walls but only the smallest individuals were able to do this. Thus, lower proportions of larger individuals were captured in the passage facilities than in the experimental passes. In the same way, the lightly built Macrobrachium spp. was found in lower proportions in the passage facilities than in the experimental passes. Furthermore, because of submerged orifices and whirling currents, the continuous-flow tanks which supplied the channels with water trapped numerous climbing shrimps. Hence, because they do not take biological criteria into account, the passage facilities investigated here were not only selective but also inefficient for shrimps. Finally, the benefits of such installations for shrimps are doubtful and simple waterfalls flowing over spillways would be at least as efficient, if not more so. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulated Rivers-research & Management\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulated Rivers-research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200003/04)16:2<101::AID-RRR569>3.0.CO;2-T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200003/04)16:2<101::AID-RRR569>3.0.CO;2-T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

在两个低水头水坝中,通过比较通过通道迁移的虾和通过提供飞溅区的实验通道捕获的虾,研究了两个快速流动的混凝土通道作为虾的通道设施的相对选择性。对虾的行为也进行了互补的视觉观察。在海拔150和320 m的两个大坝(海拔高度),上游迁移主要由小(亚幼鱼)个体进行,但也捕获了一些较大的个体,特别是无害的成年Atya。混凝土沟渠中强大的水流(1.5 m s - 1)迫使大多数虾爬过垂直的墙壁,但只有最小的个体能够做到这一点。因此,在通道设施中捕获的较大个体的比例低于在实验通道中捕获的比例。同样,在通道设施中,轻建的沼虾所占比例低于实验通道。此外,由于水下的孔洞和旋转的水流,为水道提供水的连续流动的水箱困住了许多攀缘虾。因此,由于没有考虑生物学标准,这里调查的传代设施不仅是选择性的,而且对虾来说效率低下。最后,这些设施对虾的好处是值得怀疑的,简单的瀑布在溢洪道上流动至少是同样有效的,如果不是更有效的话。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Passage facilities for Diadromous freshwater shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea) in the Bananier River, Guadeloupe, West Indies
The relative selectivity of two fast-flowing concrete channels acting as passage facilities for shrimps was investigated at two low-head dams by comparing shrimps migrating through the channels to shrimps captured by experimental (trapping) passes offering splash zones. Complementary visual observations of shrimp behaviour were also carried out. At both dams (150 and 320 m above sea level (a.s.l.)), the upstream migration was mainly undertaken by small (subjuvenile) individuals but some larger ones, notably Atya innocous adults, were also captured. Strong water currents (1.5 m s−1) in the concrete channels compelled most shrimps to climb over the vertical walls but only the smallest individuals were able to do this. Thus, lower proportions of larger individuals were captured in the passage facilities than in the experimental passes. In the same way, the lightly built Macrobrachium spp. was found in lower proportions in the passage facilities than in the experimental passes. Furthermore, because of submerged orifices and whirling currents, the continuous-flow tanks which supplied the channels with water trapped numerous climbing shrimps. Hence, because they do not take biological criteria into account, the passage facilities investigated here were not only selective but also inefficient for shrimps. Finally, the benefits of such installations for shrimps are doubtful and simple waterfalls flowing over spillways would be at least as efficient, if not more so. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信