大气产水与能源消耗的实证分析

B. Asiabanpour, Natalie B. Ownby, M. Summers, Faraz Moghimi
{"title":"大气产水与能源消耗的实证分析","authors":"B. Asiabanpour, Natalie B. Ownby, M. Summers, Faraz Moghimi","doi":"10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to clean water is a growing challenge globally, especially in areas where natural fresh water is not available and communities rely on processes like desalination for clean water. Methods for producing fresh water must be equal to or more cost effective than clean drinking water from other sources at the point of use. Atmospheric water generation is one option for producing clean drinking water. This paper examines the cost of water generated through this method and compares it to the cost of bottled water. Compared to both 12 oz. bottles of cold water from a vending machine and gallon size containers of water from a store, AWG is cost effective and takes only 72 days to break compared to 12 oz. bottles and 1,259 days to break even with gallon containers.","PeriodicalId":424038,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atmospheric Water Generation and Energy Consumption: An Empirical Analysis\",\"authors\":\"B. Asiabanpour, Natalie B. Ownby, M. Summers, Faraz Moghimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Access to clean water is a growing challenge globally, especially in areas where natural fresh water is not available and communities rely on processes like desalination for clean water. Methods for producing fresh water must be equal to or more cost effective than clean drinking water from other sources at the point of use. Atmospheric water generation is one option for producing clean drinking water. This paper examines the cost of water generated through this method and compares it to the cost of bottled water. Compared to both 12 oz. bottles of cold water from a vending machine and gallon size containers of water from a store, AWG is cost effective and takes only 72 days to break compared to 12 oz. bottles and 1,259 days to break even with gallon containers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在全球范围内,获得清洁水是一项日益严峻的挑战,特别是在缺乏天然淡水和社区依赖海水淡化等工艺获取清洁水的地区。生产淡水的方法在使用点必须等于或比其他来源的清洁饮用水更具成本效益。大气制水是生产清洁饮用水的一种选择。本文考察了通过这种方法产生的水的成本,并将其与瓶装水的成本进行了比较。与自动售货机的12盎司瓶装冷水和商店的加仑瓶装水相比,AWG具有成本效益,只需72天就能打破,而12盎司瓶装水和1259天就能打破。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atmospheric Water Generation and Energy Consumption: An Empirical Analysis
Access to clean water is a growing challenge globally, especially in areas where natural fresh water is not available and communities rely on processes like desalination for clean water. Methods for producing fresh water must be equal to or more cost effective than clean drinking water from other sources at the point of use. Atmospheric water generation is one option for producing clean drinking water. This paper examines the cost of water generated through this method and compares it to the cost of bottled water. Compared to both 12 oz. bottles of cold water from a vending machine and gallon size containers of water from a store, AWG is cost effective and takes only 72 days to break compared to 12 oz. bottles and 1,259 days to break even with gallon containers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信