大田条件下选择性杀菌剂防治洋葱霜霉病的研究

T. A. Bhatti, Z. A. Nizamani, Muswar Ali Gadhi, F. Soomro, Raj Kumar, Saeed Ahmed Abro, A. H. Soomro, S. Qazi, Umer ul din Jarwar Abdul Ghani Kandhro, Madiha Khan
{"title":"大田条件下选择性杀菌剂防治洋葱霜霉病的研究","authors":"T. A. Bhatti, Z. A. Nizamani, Muswar Ali Gadhi, F. Soomro, Raj Kumar, Saeed Ahmed Abro, A. H. Soomro, S. Qazi, Umer ul din Jarwar Abdul Ghani Kandhro, Madiha Khan","doi":"10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficacy of variousfungicides against powdery mildew of onion all chemical treated 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th observation Score observation in plants (out of 15) were0.97, 2.89, 2.44 and 2.22 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.47, 20.00, 16.30 and 14.07% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves/plant 0.20, 2.04, 2.38 and 2.02 against 1.04, 4.36,4.99 and 4.04leaves in control, respectively. The Cabriotop observation resulted in infected plants 1.00, 2.56, 1.89 and 1.67 against 2.32, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.67, 17.04, 12.59 and 11.11 against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control, infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 126.50g.The Relly observation in infected plants 0.96, 3.33, 2.78 and 3.11 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.42, 22.22, 18.52 and 20.74% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 116.38g against 74.34g in control. Defer plus at observation resulted ininfected plants of 0.95, 2.78, 2.56 and 2.78 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.33, 18.52, 17.04 and 18.52% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.50, 2.10, 2.48 and 1.96 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04/plant in control; with average bulb weight of 101.63g, 106.97g and 112.61g overall average bulb weight of 107.07g against 74.34g bulb weight on average in control","PeriodicalId":197597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Downy Mildew of Onion Through Selective Fungicides in the Field Condition\",\"authors\":\"T. A. Bhatti, Z. A. Nizamani, Muswar Ali Gadhi, F. Soomro, Raj Kumar, Saeed Ahmed Abro, A. H. Soomro, S. Qazi, Umer ul din Jarwar Abdul Ghani Kandhro, Madiha Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Efficacy of variousfungicides against powdery mildew of onion all chemical treated 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th observation Score observation in plants (out of 15) were0.97, 2.89, 2.44 and 2.22 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.47, 20.00, 16.30 and 14.07% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves/plant 0.20, 2.04, 2.38 and 2.02 against 1.04, 4.36,4.99 and 4.04leaves in control, respectively. The Cabriotop observation resulted in infected plants 1.00, 2.56, 1.89 and 1.67 against 2.32, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.67, 17.04, 12.59 and 11.11 against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control, infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 126.50g.The Relly observation in infected plants 0.96, 3.33, 2.78 and 3.11 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.42, 22.22, 18.52 and 20.74% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 116.38g against 74.34g in control. Defer plus at observation resulted ininfected plants of 0.95, 2.78, 2.56 and 2.78 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.33, 18.52, 17.04 and 18.52% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.50, 2.10, 2.48 and 1.96 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04/plant in control; with average bulb weight of 101.63g, 106.97g and 112.61g overall average bulb weight of 107.07g against 74.34g bulb weight on average in control\",\"PeriodicalId\":197597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

不同杀菌剂对化学处理洋葱白粉病的防治效果(1、2、3、4组):15株植物的得分分别为0.97、2.89、2.44、2.22,对照为2.33、9.00、10.00、10.33;疾病感染率分别为6.47、20.00、16.30、14.07%,对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;染病叶片/株分别为0.20、2.04、2.38和2.02,对照为1.04、4.36、4.99和4.04。Cabriotop检测结果显示,感染株分别为1.00、2.56、1.89和1.67,对照为2.32、9.00、10.00和10.33;病染率分别为6.67、17.04、12.59、11.11,对照为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;病染叶片分别为0.41、2.22、2.62、2.07,对照为1.04、4.36、4.99、4.04,平均鳞茎重为126.50g。与对照的2.33、9.00、10.00和10.33相比,侵染植株的赖利值分别为0.96、3.33、2.78和3.11;疾病感染率分别为6.42、22.22、18.52、20.74%,对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;侵染叶片分别为0.41、2.22、2.62和2.07,对照为1.04、4.36、4.99和4.04,平均鳞茎重为116.38g,对照为74.34g。延迟加株的侵染株数分别为0.95、2.78、2.56和2.78,对照株数分别为2.33、9.00、10.00和10.33;疾病感染率分别为6.33、18.52、17.04、18.52%,对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;侵染叶片为0.50、2.10、2.48、1.96 /株,对照为1.04、4.36、4.99、4.04/株;平均球茎重量分别为101.63g、106.97g和112.61g,对照组平均球茎重量为107.07g,对照组平均球茎重量为74.34g
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Downy Mildew of Onion Through Selective Fungicides in the Field Condition
Efficacy of variousfungicides against powdery mildew of onion all chemical treated 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th observation Score observation in plants (out of 15) were0.97, 2.89, 2.44 and 2.22 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.47, 20.00, 16.30 and 14.07% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves/plant 0.20, 2.04, 2.38 and 2.02 against 1.04, 4.36,4.99 and 4.04leaves in control, respectively. The Cabriotop observation resulted in infected plants 1.00, 2.56, 1.89 and 1.67 against 2.32, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.67, 17.04, 12.59 and 11.11 against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control, infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 126.50g.The Relly observation in infected plants 0.96, 3.33, 2.78 and 3.11 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.42, 22.22, 18.52 and 20.74% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 116.38g against 74.34g in control. Defer plus at observation resulted ininfected plants of 0.95, 2.78, 2.56 and 2.78 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.33, 18.52, 17.04 and 18.52% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.50, 2.10, 2.48 and 1.96 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04/plant in control; with average bulb weight of 101.63g, 106.97g and 112.61g overall average bulb weight of 107.07g against 74.34g bulb weight on average in control
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信