“面对面与翻转”:解剖学和生理学专业一年级学生学业成绩和学习偏好的比较研究

L. Wendt, E. Toit, Helen L. Naug
{"title":"“面对面与翻转”:解剖学和生理学专业一年级学生学业成绩和学习偏好的比较研究","authors":"L. Wendt, E. Toit, Helen L. Naug","doi":"10.4995/head21.2021.13017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A mixed-mode or ‘‘flipped’’ model of learning focusses on supporting a high level of student engagement, student motivation, and the transferability of specific course content. A blend of online resources and face-to-face (F2F) learning facilitates meaningful interaction between peers, while building a capacity for self-directed and lifelong learning. Within the School of Medical Science, Anatomy and Physiology (A&P) content was ‘flipped’ for delivery at a new campus to align with the traditional F2F offering.  Lectures were delivered online, while tutorials and practicums were F2F.. Collaborative learning opportunities utilizing active learning pedagogies was appealing and was integrated during the re-alignment of A&P which was delivered to a cohort of allied health students undertaking their first year of their program.  This study assessed how this type of learning was received by students (from the same program) undertaking the same course in an on-campus F2F delivery. Students completed surveys relating to their experiences in learning activities applied in: lectures, tutorials and practicums.  In addition, academic outcomes (theoretical and practical) across the two modalities were also evaluated.  Overall, students undertaking the mixed-mode delivery performed significantly better in theoretical assessments, while performance in practical assessments was comparable between both deliveries.  Student preferences to learning and teaching activities was mixed, however all students highly valued the use of “mini-quizzes” in  lectures, tutorials and practicums. ","PeriodicalId":169443,"journal":{"name":"7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'21)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Face-to Face vs. Flipped’: A Comparative Study on Academic Outcomes and Learning Preferences in First Year Allied Health Students Undertaking Anatomy and Physiology\",\"authors\":\"L. Wendt, E. Toit, Helen L. Naug\",\"doi\":\"10.4995/head21.2021.13017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A mixed-mode or ‘‘flipped’’ model of learning focusses on supporting a high level of student engagement, student motivation, and the transferability of specific course content. A blend of online resources and face-to-face (F2F) learning facilitates meaningful interaction between peers, while building a capacity for self-directed and lifelong learning. Within the School of Medical Science, Anatomy and Physiology (A&P) content was ‘flipped’ for delivery at a new campus to align with the traditional F2F offering.  Lectures were delivered online, while tutorials and practicums were F2F.. Collaborative learning opportunities utilizing active learning pedagogies was appealing and was integrated during the re-alignment of A&P which was delivered to a cohort of allied health students undertaking their first year of their program.  This study assessed how this type of learning was received by students (from the same program) undertaking the same course in an on-campus F2F delivery. Students completed surveys relating to their experiences in learning activities applied in: lectures, tutorials and practicums.  In addition, academic outcomes (theoretical and practical) across the two modalities were also evaluated.  Overall, students undertaking the mixed-mode delivery performed significantly better in theoretical assessments, while performance in practical assessments was comparable between both deliveries.  Student preferences to learning and teaching activities was mixed, however all students highly valued the use of “mini-quizzes” in  lectures, tutorials and practicums. \",\"PeriodicalId\":169443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'21)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'21)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4995/head21.2021.13017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'21)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/head21.2021.13017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混合模式或“翻转”学习模式侧重于支持高水平的学生参与、学生动机和特定课程内容的可转移性。在线资源和面对面(F2F)学习的结合促进了同伴之间有意义的互动,同时建立了自主学习和终身学习的能力。在医学科学学院,解剖学和生理学(A&P)的内容被“翻转”到新校区,以与传统的F2F课程保持一致。授课是在线授课,辅导课和实习是F2F的。利用主动学习教学法的合作学习机会很有吸引力,并在A&P重新调整期间被整合到一群从事第一年项目的联合健康学生中。本研究评估了在校内F2F交付中,学习同一课程(来自同一项目)的学生如何接受这种类型的学习。学生们完成了关于他们在讲座、辅导课和实习活动中的学习经验的调查。此外,还对两种模式的学术成果(理论和实践)进行了评估。总体而言,采用混合模式教学的学生在理论评估中表现明显更好,而在实践评估中的表现在两种教学方式之间是相当的。学生对学习和教学活动的偏好参差不齐,但所有学生都高度重视在讲座、辅导课和实习中使用“小测验”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Face-to Face vs. Flipped’: A Comparative Study on Academic Outcomes and Learning Preferences in First Year Allied Health Students Undertaking Anatomy and Physiology
A mixed-mode or ‘‘flipped’’ model of learning focusses on supporting a high level of student engagement, student motivation, and the transferability of specific course content. A blend of online resources and face-to-face (F2F) learning facilitates meaningful interaction between peers, while building a capacity for self-directed and lifelong learning. Within the School of Medical Science, Anatomy and Physiology (A&P) content was ‘flipped’ for delivery at a new campus to align with the traditional F2F offering.  Lectures were delivered online, while tutorials and practicums were F2F.. Collaborative learning opportunities utilizing active learning pedagogies was appealing and was integrated during the re-alignment of A&P which was delivered to a cohort of allied health students undertaking their first year of their program.  This study assessed how this type of learning was received by students (from the same program) undertaking the same course in an on-campus F2F delivery. Students completed surveys relating to their experiences in learning activities applied in: lectures, tutorials and practicums.  In addition, academic outcomes (theoretical and practical) across the two modalities were also evaluated.  Overall, students undertaking the mixed-mode delivery performed significantly better in theoretical assessments, while performance in practical assessments was comparable between both deliveries.  Student preferences to learning and teaching activities was mixed, however all students highly valued the use of “mini-quizzes” in  lectures, tutorials and practicums. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信