公共流动性与金融危机

Wenhao Li
{"title":"公共流动性与金融危机","authors":"Wenhao Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3175101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is the supply of public liquidity important for alleviating financial crises? I quantify a general equilibrium model featuring the liquidity insurance channel: Banks demand public liquidity as insurance against liquidation losses during banking crises. Cheaper liquidity insurance increases banks' liquidity buffer, which increases bank lending and thus output. Supporting this channel, the calibrated model explains 42% of variations in the liquidity premium. Counterfactual analyses reveal that without QE1, the cumulative output will be lower by at least 1.4%. However, due to large existing liquidity supply, the recent QE infinity in response to the coronavirus is much less effective. \n \nAppendix can be found here: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3347232.","PeriodicalId":332226,"journal":{"name":"USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"50 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Liquidity and Financial Crises\",\"authors\":\"Wenhao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3175101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is the supply of public liquidity important for alleviating financial crises? I quantify a general equilibrium model featuring the liquidity insurance channel: Banks demand public liquidity as insurance against liquidation losses during banking crises. Cheaper liquidity insurance increases banks' liquidity buffer, which increases bank lending and thus output. Supporting this channel, the calibrated model explains 42% of variations in the liquidity premium. Counterfactual analyses reveal that without QE1, the cumulative output will be lower by at least 1.4%. However, due to large existing liquidity supply, the recent QE infinity in response to the coronavirus is much less effective. \\n \\nAppendix can be found here: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3347232.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"50 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

公共流动性的供给对缓解金融危机很重要吗?我量化了一个具有流动性保险渠道的一般均衡模型:银行在银行危机期间需要公共流动性作为清算损失的保险。更便宜的流动性保险增加了银行的流动性缓冲,从而增加了银行贷款,从而增加了产出。为了支持这一渠道,校准后的模型解释了42%的流动性溢价变化。反事实分析显示,如果没有QE1,累计产出将至少下降1.4%。然而,由于现有的大量流动性供应,最近为应对冠状病毒而推出的无限量化宽松政策的效果要差得多。附录可以在这里找到:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3347232。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Liquidity and Financial Crises
Is the supply of public liquidity important for alleviating financial crises? I quantify a general equilibrium model featuring the liquidity insurance channel: Banks demand public liquidity as insurance against liquidation losses during banking crises. Cheaper liquidity insurance increases banks' liquidity buffer, which increases bank lending and thus output. Supporting this channel, the calibrated model explains 42% of variations in the liquidity premium. Counterfactual analyses reveal that without QE1, the cumulative output will be lower by at least 1.4%. However, due to large existing liquidity supply, the recent QE infinity in response to the coronavirus is much less effective. Appendix can be found here: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3347232.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信