联邦政府学院在职教师专业发展项目的模式与实施方法

C. O. Ezeugbor, Ijeoma Joyce Chukwuemeka-Nworu
{"title":"联邦政府学院在职教师专业发展项目的模式与实施方法","authors":"C. O. Ezeugbor, Ijeoma Joyce Chukwuemeka-Nworu","doi":"10.26762/iajtl.201800001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed the implementation of models and delivery methods of in-service professional development programmes of Federal Government Colleges (FGC). Two research questions guided the study and two hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study adopted descriptive survey research design and the study population comprised 276 teachers (58 males and 218 females within the age brackets of 25-60 years). Data was collected using questionnaire titled, “Implementation of models and delivery methods of in-service development Questionnaire” (IMDIDQ) which was validated. Cronbach Alpha method was used to determine the reliability coefficient of the instrument, the overall reliability coefficient was 0.88. Arithmetic mean and standard deviation were used in analyzing collected data, while z-test was used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The findings of the study showed that the models utilized were implemented on a low extent and there was significant difference in the mean ratings of male and female teachers on the extent of implementation of delivery methods used for in-service teachers’ professional development programmes of FGCs.","PeriodicalId":431013,"journal":{"name":"International Advanced Journal of Teaching and Learning","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models and Delivery Methods of In-service Teacher’s Professional Development Programmes of Federal Government Colleges\",\"authors\":\"C. O. Ezeugbor, Ijeoma Joyce Chukwuemeka-Nworu\",\"doi\":\"10.26762/iajtl.201800001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study assessed the implementation of models and delivery methods of in-service professional development programmes of Federal Government Colleges (FGC). Two research questions guided the study and two hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study adopted descriptive survey research design and the study population comprised 276 teachers (58 males and 218 females within the age brackets of 25-60 years). Data was collected using questionnaire titled, “Implementation of models and delivery methods of in-service development Questionnaire” (IMDIDQ) which was validated. Cronbach Alpha method was used to determine the reliability coefficient of the instrument, the overall reliability coefficient was 0.88. Arithmetic mean and standard deviation were used in analyzing collected data, while z-test was used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The findings of the study showed that the models utilized were implemented on a low extent and there was significant difference in the mean ratings of male and female teachers on the extent of implementation of delivery methods used for in-service teachers’ professional development programmes of FGCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Advanced Journal of Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Advanced Journal of Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26762/iajtl.201800001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Advanced Journal of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26762/iajtl.201800001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究评估了联邦政府学院在职专业发展课程的实施模式和交付方法。两个研究问题指导研究,两个假设在0.05水平上进行显著性检验。本研究采用描述性调查研究设计,研究对象为276名教师,其中男58名,女218名,年龄在25-60岁之间。数据收集使用问卷“在职发展问卷(IMDIDQ)的模型实现和交付方法”进行验证。采用Cronbach Alpha法确定仪器的信度系数,总体信度系数为0.88。收集数据的分析采用算术平均值和标准差,零假设的检验采用z检验,显著性水平为0.05。研究结果显示,所使用的模式实施程度较低,男女教师对FGCs在职教师专业发展计划中使用的交付方法实施程度的平均评分存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Models and Delivery Methods of In-service Teacher’s Professional Development Programmes of Federal Government Colleges
This study assessed the implementation of models and delivery methods of in-service professional development programmes of Federal Government Colleges (FGC). Two research questions guided the study and two hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study adopted descriptive survey research design and the study population comprised 276 teachers (58 males and 218 females within the age brackets of 25-60 years). Data was collected using questionnaire titled, “Implementation of models and delivery methods of in-service development Questionnaire” (IMDIDQ) which was validated. Cronbach Alpha method was used to determine the reliability coefficient of the instrument, the overall reliability coefficient was 0.88. Arithmetic mean and standard deviation were used in analyzing collected data, while z-test was used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The findings of the study showed that the models utilized were implemented on a low extent and there was significant difference in the mean ratings of male and female teachers on the extent of implementation of delivery methods used for in-service teachers’ professional development programmes of FGCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信