影子教师对其工作职责的看法

Anja Gajić, B. Arsić, Kristina Ivanović, Sara Vidojković, A. Bašić, Dragana Maćešić-Petrović
{"title":"影子教师对其工作职责的看法","authors":"Anja Gajić, B. Arsić, Kristina Ivanović, Sara Vidojković, A. Bašić, Dragana Maćešić-Petrović","doi":"10.51558/2744-1555.2021.4.2.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parents of children with disabilities are eligible to apply for additional services to aid their\nchild in the education process. Parents frequently use the service of shadow teachers, but they\noften end up unsatisfied with the service and change shadow teachers repeatedly. The aim of\nthis research is to a) examine shadow teachers' beliefs about their obligations; b) determine\nwhat are their obligations; c) determine what they believe is their level of proficiency in\ndifferent areas of shadow teaching position and d) determine the discrepancy between what\nshadow teachers believe their job should be and what job obligations they were expected to\ndo while shadowing a child.\nThe instrument used was the survey distributed by Manansala & Dizon (2008), it was\ntranslated into Serbian language and modified. The sample consisted of 36 students of\nFaculty for Special education who currently work or have worked in the past as a shadow\nteacher.\nSince the sample consisted of shadow teachers who are also students of special education, it\nis expected that most of the sample believe that they are very proficient in all job areas. There\nwas a huge discrepancy between what they believe is their job obligation and what their job\nresponsibilities are in all five areas. Future research implications and study limitations were\ndiscussed.\nKey words: shadow teachers, inclusion, school, disability.","PeriodicalId":247394,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education and Rehabilitation","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SHADOW TEACHERS OPINIONS ABOUT THEIR JOB RESPONSIBILITIES\",\"authors\":\"Anja Gajić, B. Arsić, Kristina Ivanović, Sara Vidojković, A. Bašić, Dragana Maćešić-Petrović\",\"doi\":\"10.51558/2744-1555.2021.4.2.134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parents of children with disabilities are eligible to apply for additional services to aid their\\nchild in the education process. Parents frequently use the service of shadow teachers, but they\\noften end up unsatisfied with the service and change shadow teachers repeatedly. The aim of\\nthis research is to a) examine shadow teachers' beliefs about their obligations; b) determine\\nwhat are their obligations; c) determine what they believe is their level of proficiency in\\ndifferent areas of shadow teaching position and d) determine the discrepancy between what\\nshadow teachers believe their job should be and what job obligations they were expected to\\ndo while shadowing a child.\\nThe instrument used was the survey distributed by Manansala & Dizon (2008), it was\\ntranslated into Serbian language and modified. The sample consisted of 36 students of\\nFaculty for Special education who currently work or have worked in the past as a shadow\\nteacher.\\nSince the sample consisted of shadow teachers who are also students of special education, it\\nis expected that most of the sample believe that they are very proficient in all job areas. There\\nwas a huge discrepancy between what they believe is their job obligation and what their job\\nresponsibilities are in all five areas. Future research implications and study limitations were\\ndiscussed.\\nKey words: shadow teachers, inclusion, school, disability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Education and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Education and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51558/2744-1555.2021.4.2.134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51558/2744-1555.2021.4.2.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

残疾儿童的家长有资格申请额外的服务,以协助他们的孩子在教育过程中。家长经常使用影子教师的服务,但往往对服务不满意,反复更换影子教师。本研究的目的是a)检验影子教师对其义务的信念;B)确定他们的义务;C)确定他们认为自己在影子教师职位的各个领域的熟练程度;d)确定影子教师认为他们的工作应该是什么与他们在影子教师中被期望做的工作义务之间的差异。使用的工具是Manansala & Dizon(2008)分发的调查,它被翻译成塞尔维亚语并进行了修改。样本包括36名特殊教育学院的学生,他们目前或曾经担任过影子教师。由于样本由影子教师组成,他们也是接受特殊教育的学生,因此预计大多数样本认为他们在所有工作领域都非常精通。在这五个领域中,他们认为自己的工作义务和工作责任之间存在巨大差异。讨论了未来研究的意义和研究的局限性。关键词:影子教师,融合,学校,残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SHADOW TEACHERS OPINIONS ABOUT THEIR JOB RESPONSIBILITIES
Parents of children with disabilities are eligible to apply for additional services to aid their child in the education process. Parents frequently use the service of shadow teachers, but they often end up unsatisfied with the service and change shadow teachers repeatedly. The aim of this research is to a) examine shadow teachers' beliefs about their obligations; b) determine what are their obligations; c) determine what they believe is their level of proficiency in different areas of shadow teaching position and d) determine the discrepancy between what shadow teachers believe their job should be and what job obligations they were expected to do while shadowing a child. The instrument used was the survey distributed by Manansala & Dizon (2008), it was translated into Serbian language and modified. The sample consisted of 36 students of Faculty for Special education who currently work or have worked in the past as a shadow teacher. Since the sample consisted of shadow teachers who are also students of special education, it is expected that most of the sample believe that they are very proficient in all job areas. There was a huge discrepancy between what they believe is their job obligation and what their job responsibilities are in all five areas. Future research implications and study limitations were discussed. Key words: shadow teachers, inclusion, school, disability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信