分析过程的资本化:由于叙述,使再现性,开放性和适应性成为可能

Alexis Lebis, Marie Lefèvre, Vanda Luengo, N. Guin
{"title":"分析过程的资本化:由于叙述,使再现性,开放性和适应性成为可能","authors":"Alexis Lebis, Marie Lefèvre, Vanda Luengo, N. Guin","doi":"10.1145/3170358.3170408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis processes of learning traces, used to gain important pedagogical insights, are yet to be easily shared and reused. They face what is commonly called a reproducibility crisis. From our observations, we identify two important factors that may be the cause of this crisis: technical constraints due to runnable necessities, and context dependencies. Moreover, the meaning of the reproducibility itself is ambiguous and a source of misunderstanding. In this paper, we present an ontological framework dedicated to taking full advantage of already implemented educational analyses. This framework shifts the actual paradigm of analysis processes by representing them from a narrative point of view, instead of a technical one. This enables a formal description of analysis processes with high-level concepts. We show how this description is performed, and how it can help analysts. The goal is to empower both expert and non-expert analysis stakeholders with the possibility to be involved in the elaboration of analysis processes and their reuse in different contexts, by improving both human and machine understanding of these analyses. This possibility is known as the capitalisation of analysis processes of learning traces.","PeriodicalId":437369,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capitalisation of analysis processes: enabling reproducibility, openness and adaptability thanks to narration\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Lebis, Marie Lefèvre, Vanda Luengo, N. Guin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3170358.3170408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analysis processes of learning traces, used to gain important pedagogical insights, are yet to be easily shared and reused. They face what is commonly called a reproducibility crisis. From our observations, we identify two important factors that may be the cause of this crisis: technical constraints due to runnable necessities, and context dependencies. Moreover, the meaning of the reproducibility itself is ambiguous and a source of misunderstanding. In this paper, we present an ontological framework dedicated to taking full advantage of already implemented educational analyses. This framework shifts the actual paradigm of analysis processes by representing them from a narrative point of view, instead of a technical one. This enables a formal description of analysis processes with high-level concepts. We show how this description is performed, and how it can help analysts. The goal is to empower both expert and non-expert analysis stakeholders with the possibility to be involved in the elaboration of analysis processes and their reuse in different contexts, by improving both human and machine understanding of these analyses. This possibility is known as the capitalisation of analysis processes of learning traces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

学习轨迹的分析过程,用于获得重要的教学见解,还没有很容易地共享和重用。它们面临着通常所说的可重复性危机。从我们的观察中,我们确定了两个可能导致这场危机的重要因素:由于不可运行的需求而产生的技术限制,以及上下文依赖。此外,再现性本身的含义是模糊的,是误解的来源。在本文中,我们提出了一个本体论框架,致力于充分利用已经实施的教育分析。这个框架通过从叙述的角度而不是技术的角度来表示分析过程,从而改变了分析过程的实际范例。这使得对具有高级概念的分析过程的正式描述成为可能。我们将展示如何执行此描述,以及它如何帮助分析人员。目标是通过提高人类和机器对这些分析的理解,使专家和非专家分析涉众都有可能参与分析过程的细化及其在不同环境中的重用。这种可能性被称为学习痕迹分析过程的资本化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capitalisation of analysis processes: enabling reproducibility, openness and adaptability thanks to narration
Analysis processes of learning traces, used to gain important pedagogical insights, are yet to be easily shared and reused. They face what is commonly called a reproducibility crisis. From our observations, we identify two important factors that may be the cause of this crisis: technical constraints due to runnable necessities, and context dependencies. Moreover, the meaning of the reproducibility itself is ambiguous and a source of misunderstanding. In this paper, we present an ontological framework dedicated to taking full advantage of already implemented educational analyses. This framework shifts the actual paradigm of analysis processes by representing them from a narrative point of view, instead of a technical one. This enables a formal description of analysis processes with high-level concepts. We show how this description is performed, and how it can help analysts. The goal is to empower both expert and non-expert analysis stakeholders with the possibility to be involved in the elaboration of analysis processes and their reuse in different contexts, by improving both human and machine understanding of these analyses. This possibility is known as the capitalisation of analysis processes of learning traces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信