局部麻醉药的临床比较研究。四种商业制剂的随机双盲研究]。

Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift Pub Date : 1991-12-01
F Khoury, A Hinterthan, J Schürmann, H Arns
{"title":"局部麻醉药的临床比较研究。四种商业制剂的随机双盲研究]。","authors":"F Khoury,&nbsp;A Hinterthan,&nbsp;J Schürmann,&nbsp;H Arns","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a randomized double blind study effects and tolerability of the local anesthetics Prilocaine 3% with Felypressin, Articaine 4% with Epinephrine 1/200,000 and 1/100,000, and Lidocaine 2% with Epinephrine 1/100,000 were tested. There was no significant difference between the four agents as far as effect on blood pressure, pulse, and tissue rehabilitation are concerned. Prilocaine can be used for extractions and surgical tooth removal. It can not be recommended for apicoectomy or implantation. The better results of Articaine 4% compared to Lidocaine 2% were statistically not significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11244,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift","volume":"46 12","pages":"822-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical comparative study of local anesthetics. Random double blind study with four commercial preparations].\",\"authors\":\"F Khoury,&nbsp;A Hinterthan,&nbsp;J Schürmann,&nbsp;H Arns\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a randomized double blind study effects and tolerability of the local anesthetics Prilocaine 3% with Felypressin, Articaine 4% with Epinephrine 1/200,000 and 1/100,000, and Lidocaine 2% with Epinephrine 1/100,000 were tested. There was no significant difference between the four agents as far as effect on blood pressure, pulse, and tissue rehabilitation are concerned. Prilocaine can be used for extractions and surgical tooth removal. It can not be recommended for apicoectomy or implantation. The better results of Articaine 4% compared to Lidocaine 2% were statistically not significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift\",\"volume\":\"46 12\",\"pages\":\"822-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项随机双盲研究中,检测了局麻药3%普拉卡因与Felypressin、4%阿替卡因与1/20万和1/10万肾上腺素、2%利多卡因与1/10万肾上腺素的疗效和耐受性。四种药物对血压、脉搏、组织康复的影响无显著差异。丙胺卡因可用于拔牙和手术拔牙。不推荐用于根尖切除术或植入术。阿替卡因4%优于利多卡因2%,差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Clinical comparative study of local anesthetics. Random double blind study with four commercial preparations].

In a randomized double blind study effects and tolerability of the local anesthetics Prilocaine 3% with Felypressin, Articaine 4% with Epinephrine 1/200,000 and 1/100,000, and Lidocaine 2% with Epinephrine 1/100,000 were tested. There was no significant difference between the four agents as far as effect on blood pressure, pulse, and tissue rehabilitation are concerned. Prilocaine can be used for extractions and surgical tooth removal. It can not be recommended for apicoectomy or implantation. The better results of Articaine 4% compared to Lidocaine 2% were statistically not significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信