过敏性哮喘药物研究中的过敏原激发试验:过去,现在和未来的方向

Christianne M Blais, D. Cockcroft, B. Davis
{"title":"过敏性哮喘药物研究中的过敏原激发试验:过去,现在和未来的方向","authors":"Christianne M Blais, D. Cockcroft, B. Davis","doi":"10.33590/emjrespir/10313205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, various allergen inhalation challenge models have been developed to study the pathophysiology and pharmacology of allergen-induced asthma. Each allergen challenge method possesses unique benefits and disadvantages. The classic allergen challenge model is useful for assessing the efficacy of new treatments but does not reflect real-world repeated exposure and excludes approximately 50% of allergic asthmatics (i.e. those who do not exhibit a late asthmatic response). The early response model, while also artificial, is less time-consuming and allows for the generation of dose-response data but does not assess the late response or related sequelae. The repeated low-dose allergen model was developed with the purpose of mimicking natural exposure for induction of airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. However, this method does not consistently produce airway inflammation and is less practical to perform due to the number of study visits required. The segmental allergen model is the only one to allow direct sampling of airway secretions for airway inflammation studies, but it is highly invasive and requires special training and equipment. Attempts have been made to establish a repeated high-dose allergen model for the assessment of drug effects on symptoms and rescue medication use, but participant safety remains a concern and it is also less practical than the classic method. The most difficult allergen model to perform is the natural exposure method, for which standardisation may not be possible given the number of environmental factors that must be controlled or measured. Modifications to these allergen models could improve their clinical relevance and identify their specific, tailored applications in pharmaceutical research of allergic asthma.","PeriodicalId":300382,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Respiratory","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergen Challenge Testing in Atopic Asthma Pharmaceutical Research: Past, Present, and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"Christianne M Blais, D. Cockcroft, B. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.33590/emjrespir/10313205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the years, various allergen inhalation challenge models have been developed to study the pathophysiology and pharmacology of allergen-induced asthma. Each allergen challenge method possesses unique benefits and disadvantages. The classic allergen challenge model is useful for assessing the efficacy of new treatments but does not reflect real-world repeated exposure and excludes approximately 50% of allergic asthmatics (i.e. those who do not exhibit a late asthmatic response). The early response model, while also artificial, is less time-consuming and allows for the generation of dose-response data but does not assess the late response or related sequelae. The repeated low-dose allergen model was developed with the purpose of mimicking natural exposure for induction of airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. However, this method does not consistently produce airway inflammation and is less practical to perform due to the number of study visits required. The segmental allergen model is the only one to allow direct sampling of airway secretions for airway inflammation studies, but it is highly invasive and requires special training and equipment. Attempts have been made to establish a repeated high-dose allergen model for the assessment of drug effects on symptoms and rescue medication use, but participant safety remains a concern and it is also less practical than the classic method. The most difficult allergen model to perform is the natural exposure method, for which standardisation may not be possible given the number of environmental factors that must be controlled or measured. Modifications to these allergen models could improve their clinical relevance and identify their specific, tailored applications in pharmaceutical research of allergic asthma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EMJ Respiratory\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EMJ Respiratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjrespir/10313205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Respiratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjrespir/10313205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多年来,人们建立了各种过敏原吸入刺激模型来研究过敏原诱发哮喘的病理生理和药理学。每种过敏原挑战方法都有其独特的优点和缺点。经典的过敏原激发模型对评估新疗法的疗效是有用的,但不能反映真实世界的反复暴露,并且排除了大约50%的过敏性哮喘患者(即那些没有表现出晚期哮喘反应的人)。早期反应模型虽然也是人为的,但更节省时间,并允许产生剂量-反应数据,但不评估晚期反应或相关后遗症。重复低剂量过敏原模型旨在模拟自然暴露诱导气道炎症和气道高反应性。然而,这种方法并不总是产生气道炎症,而且由于需要进行多次研究访问,因此不太实用。节段过敏原模型是唯一一种允许直接采样气道分泌物用于气道炎症研究的模型,但它具有高度的侵入性,需要特殊的培训和设备。已经尝试建立一个重复高剂量过敏原模型,以评估药物对症状的影响和抢救用药,但参与者的安全仍然是一个问题,而且它也不如经典方法实用。最难执行的过敏原模型是自然暴露法,考虑到必须控制或测量的环境因素的数量,可能无法对其进行标准化。对这些过敏原模型的修改可以提高它们的临床相关性,并确定它们在过敏性哮喘药物研究中的特定、定制应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Allergen Challenge Testing in Atopic Asthma Pharmaceutical Research: Past, Present, and Future Directions
Over the years, various allergen inhalation challenge models have been developed to study the pathophysiology and pharmacology of allergen-induced asthma. Each allergen challenge method possesses unique benefits and disadvantages. The classic allergen challenge model is useful for assessing the efficacy of new treatments but does not reflect real-world repeated exposure and excludes approximately 50% of allergic asthmatics (i.e. those who do not exhibit a late asthmatic response). The early response model, while also artificial, is less time-consuming and allows for the generation of dose-response data but does not assess the late response or related sequelae. The repeated low-dose allergen model was developed with the purpose of mimicking natural exposure for induction of airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. However, this method does not consistently produce airway inflammation and is less practical to perform due to the number of study visits required. The segmental allergen model is the only one to allow direct sampling of airway secretions for airway inflammation studies, but it is highly invasive and requires special training and equipment. Attempts have been made to establish a repeated high-dose allergen model for the assessment of drug effects on symptoms and rescue medication use, but participant safety remains a concern and it is also less practical than the classic method. The most difficult allergen model to perform is the natural exposure method, for which standardisation may not be possible given the number of environmental factors that must be controlled or measured. Modifications to these allergen models could improve their clinical relevance and identify their specific, tailored applications in pharmaceutical research of allergic asthma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信