{"title":"[修复后复合材料试件抗剪强度检验]。","authors":"H G Schaller, W Götze, M Siedler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The test of the shearstrength of two composite-inlay-materials and two posterior composites exhibited a statistically significant less bond-strength of repaired specimen compaired with unrepaired control-groups, whereas each material showed different results. The indirect-inlay-system proved to have the lowest bondstrength after repairing. The combination of the two posterior composites as well as the two inlay-systems with each other showed that none of these materials was convincing as a repairing material.</p>","PeriodicalId":77521,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)","volume":"41 5","pages":"149-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Examination of shear strength of repaired composite specimen].\",\"authors\":\"H G Schaller, W Götze, M Siedler\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The test of the shearstrength of two composite-inlay-materials and two posterior composites exhibited a statistically significant less bond-strength of repaired specimen compaired with unrepaired control-groups, whereas each material showed different results. The indirect-inlay-system proved to have the lowest bondstrength after repairing. The combination of the two posterior composites as well as the two inlay-systems with each other showed that none of these materials was convincing as a repairing material.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"149-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Examination of shear strength of repaired composite specimen].
The test of the shearstrength of two composite-inlay-materials and two posterior composites exhibited a statistically significant less bond-strength of repaired specimen compaired with unrepaired control-groups, whereas each material showed different results. The indirect-inlay-system proved to have the lowest bondstrength after repairing. The combination of the two posterior composites as well as the two inlay-systems with each other showed that none of these materials was convincing as a repairing material.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
